Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Bruce Springsteen


The Nal

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 478
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So, after a few weeks of listening to Bruce without the ESB, I'm really hoping for a solo tour of some sort. Been 10 years since the last one. He usually does a solo album/tour every 10 decade or so. 2005 Devils and Dust, 95 Tom Joad, 82 Nebraska and he was signed in 72 as a solo artist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see him do what he started to do with the 'other' group (Lucky Town/Human Touch), when he was going to have a much smaller band. But he bottled it. Apparently.

He could something like Jeff Tweedy's done. Do parts of a show on his own, then have a bit with a totally different band. I thought Zachary Alford was amazing on those shows... much looser.

He bottled it because he said the public weren't buying the tunes he was writing. Hence the next album being Joad. Much darker.

He must have a huge collection of tunes in the back pocket that wouldn't work with the ESB? I'd love a stripped back solo tour. The Devils and Dust tour was so dark and yet so intimate. I love that deadly serious side to him. A lot more interesting now that we know he has battled depression. Devils and Dust, Reno, Philadelphia, most of Nebraska, Ghost of Tom Joad etc. About as far away from "Shout" or any of that stadium panto as you'll get.

Also heres a pic of him around the "Other Band" era, before he got the hair and teeth done. Looks a bit David Brent!

120618050125-bruce-springsteen-12-horizo

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As regards next tour id be happier with more ESB. Proviso: as long as he doesn't fall back onto whole album shows again.

He been doing pretty much the exact same thing now since Magic. Whats that? 7 years? Good fun and all but hes becoming a parody of himself. He needs to mix it up for his own sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He been doing pretty much the exact same thing now since Magic. Whats that? 7 years? Good fun and all but hes becoming a parody of himself. He needs to mix it up for his own sake.

He's played longer and more varied shows in 2012/13 than any time previous. The summer 2012 shows in particular were a career high point chief. A parody??? Disagree with you fully there. I'm not a fan of album shows but a solo show would be a bit "meh". When the ESB rolls into town there's a real buzz. Solo Bruce is a bit sit tight with arms folded nodding away at his latest interpretation of "Reno" with the pseuds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's played longer and more varied shows in 2012/13 than any time previous. The summer 2012 shows in particular were a career high point chief. A parody??? Disagree with you fully there. I'm not a fan of album shows but a solo show would be a bit "meh". When the ESB rolls into town there's a real buzz. Solo Bruce is a bit sit tight with arms folded nodding away at his latest interpretation of "Reno" with the pseuds.

220 odd songs played. Incredible really. But I just don't think another tour of Bruce rolling out the old hits is good for anyone. He'll be doing a residency in Vegas next. Setlists aside, on a create level, hes becoming less interesting which each tour.

Half of the songs on the setlist are "quick piss?" songs now where as before nearly everything was unmissable.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I didn't feel the last tour was even close to a parody. Rome was the best show I've seen in decades. A whole show on his own isn't the celebration of life that ESB shows are.

But you saw him do side 2 of Wild, Innocent with a fucking orchestra! :lol:Course thats a cracker of a show!

I saw him do Darkness in Stockholm in a very loud venue. Proper teeth shaking guitar parts and ringing ears afterwards. Which was superb. Great, great gig. As good as I've seen from him.

really? why, because you've seen him do them so many times? Waitin' On A Sunny Day was the closest to a quick piss song for me. Even then, he managed to carry it off.

Yeah partly as Ive seen him so many times but Sunny Day, Promised Land, Out on the Street etc and the standards like BTR, Dancing in the Dark and even Tenth Ave, Thunder Road, Badlands etc are losing potency. For me.

Im not saying hes a parody of himself but another tour with the same format and maybe just a new tune or two littered in? Its possible. Maybe parody is the wrong word. "Panto" would be more accurate. "Panto Bruce". He may get bored of it all himself who knows? Anyone that creative must gets bored easily.

I just think he has a shitload of songs in the can that I would love to see presented a bit differently. Doesn't have to be a huge tour or anything. He can record them on the 4 track again! And tour a couple of months doing 90 minute gigs.

Also fully agree that a solo show has none of the celebration of life feeling that an ESB show has but thats the point. But don't discount how important his solo albums are to his career, his credibility, his fans and his catalogue in general. When Bruce digs deep into the well and bangs out a "solo" song it really means something to him. Some of them, dare say, more than his big hits. They're so personal.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

220 odd songs played. Incredible really. But I just don't think another tour of Bruce rolling out the old hits is good for anyone. He'll be doing a residency in Vegas next. Setlists aside, on a create level, hes becoming less interesting which each tour.

Half of the songs on the setlist are "quick piss?" songs now where as before nearly everything was unmissable.

You could make a case that everything he's done since Nebraska has diluted his legacy just a little. The stadium jump with BITUSA is the line in the sand.

If he'd stopped at Nebraska - what a legacy that would have been. Six albums and three legendary tours. I listened to that one for the first time in ages tonight - it sound fresher and more focussed than anything he's done since to me. He's had the odd moment (one or two on the Rising and much of Magic) but its never hit the consistent heights he's been to before.

Much as I still enjoy seeing him more than anybody else - it gets harder and harder not to see him as a pastiche of himself. Yet more E Street Band? Another round of Waitin' on a Sunny Day? Not for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could make a case that everything he's done since Nebraska has diluted his legacy just a little. The stadium jump with BITUSA is the line in the sand.

If he'd stopped at Nebraska - what a legacy that would have been. Six albums and three legendary tours. I listened to that one for the first time in ages tonight - it sound fresher and more focussed than anything he's done since to me. He's had the odd moment (one or two on the Rising and much of Magic) but its never hit the consistent heights he's been to before.

Much as I still enjoy seeing him more than anybody else - it gets harder and harder not to see him as a pastiche of himself. Yet more E Street Band? Another round of Waitin' on a Sunny Day? Not for me.

Doesn't look like were getting a tour of any sort. Rumours hes getting his back finally sorted and he did look a little "off season" playing with U2 the other week.

Well deserved rest in fairness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with a lot of the comments here, I'm a pretty big Springsteen fan, but I was slightly bored when I saw him in Cardiff last year. It's all very well playing 3 hours + , but it's got to be consistent. I'd rather 2 solid hours than a messy 3.

Also that segregation system is ridiculous, plenty of space at the front but we were stuck at the back of the pitch because of all of the bruce nutters who take a day off work to sit in the queue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a relatively small area (the circle) that is seperated from the rest. I imagine it's at least partly there for safety reasons. You can buy reserved seats (usually).

I appreciate that, but they should at least open it on the sides so it acts like the Glastonbury crush barrier. I wouldn't want to sit down for a gig either so that's not on option, They should let the wristband holders in first then everyone else.

In any case it epitomized everything that's crap about stadium gigs, shite view and mediocre sound.

Edited by zero000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a relatively small area (the circle) that is seperated from the rest. I imagine it's at least partly there for safety reasons. You can buy reserved seats (usually).

Not at Cardiff mate. Zero is right. The barrier area was half the floor area at least - they'd put the roof on the Millenium and put the stage half way down dividing it in two. As one of the (Zero's words) Bruce nutters who took a day off to queue - we were in the area in front of the barrier and had almost too much room. IT was completely rammed behind the barrier. There were reserved seats - but because of the division they were off at one side. Stadium gigs - meh

Disagree with Zeros assessment of the gig though - I thought it was the best show of the ones I saw on that leg.

Edited by Ted Dansons Wig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at Cardiff mate. Zero is right. The barrier area was half the floor area at least - they'd put the roof on the Millenium and put the stage half way down dividing it in two. As one of the (Zero's words) Bruce nutters who took a day off to queue - we were in the area in front of the barrier and had almost too much room. IT was completely rammed behind the barrier. There were reserved seats - but because of the division they were off at one side. Stadium gigs - meh

Disagree with Zeros assessment of the gig though - I thought it was the best show of the ones I saw on that leg.

That's fair enough mate. I think my view of the gig was soured by being stuck a million miles away from the stage. The best thing to come out of the gig was hearing Cynthia, what a tune!

Edited by zero000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...