Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:


Man City have been averaging 89 points a season under Pep . If there were a team averaging that in the Fergie years there is no way they would have won so many titles.

 

Fergie would of raised it again and took the challenge. Like he did with abramovic and city's money.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

 

On a completely unrelated note how is Stephen Fletcher considered in Scotland. After years Wrexham have finally had a decent Scottish player. I don’t think I would keep him due to age, but his contributions and personality won’t be forgotten.


Decent player Fletcher. Scored a couple of hat tricks for Scotland. We could do with him in the summer as our 2 likely strikers for Germany don’t score goals. We’ll play with one up front and hope for goals to come from midfield. 

Glad he’s been a success as he’s a fair age to be playing that kinda role. Believe it or not my team in the Scottish championship tried to get him last summer so I’d imagine he was surprised to end up where he did. Great last move for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thetime said:

 

Extra marks for klopp for not winning the league. 🤣

 

You could argue on the quality of the league also. End of the day klopp has 1 league title at Liverpool in 9 years, which is pretty below average for people to claim he's one of the best ever. 

 

The argument about city doesn't hold up either, last 4 seasons and 1 of those he finishes above 3rd.

One league title one European cup three Euro finals other cups too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

 

Fergie would of raised it again and took the challenge. Like he did with abramovic and city's money.

 

 


I have no doubt they would have raised their game to some extent. When Wrexham won beat the points record in the national league last season I think it was largely due to being pushed all season. Chesterfield this season we’re on course for a similar total but faded when winning the league with games to spare.

 

So I agree they would also have upped their points, but if a team as good as City had been around then, there is no way Man Utd win as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Comfy Bean said:


Decent player Fletcher. Scored a couple of hat tricks for Scotland. We could do with him in the summer as our 2 likely strikers for Germany don’t score goals. We’ll play with one up front and hope for goals to come from midfield. 

Glad he’s been a success as he’s a fair age to be playing that kinda role. Believe it or not my team in the Scottish championship tried to get him last summer so I’d imagine he was surprised to end up where he did. Great last move for him.


 

It was a bit of a fluke of circumstances. We tried to sign another player on transfer deadline day which fell apart due to an administration error. This left us only able to sign free agents and that’s a pretty small pool when the window has shut.

 

8 goals in 33 games is decent return for someone who plays 15 minutes most games. We tried to start him (you can see he is a class above) but he doesn’t really have the legs and despite scoring a hat trick one game generally worked better as a substitute. Great character in the dressing room as well and will be missed if he moves on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all relative, isn't it? 

 

Screenshot_20240429_094020_Facebook.thumb.jpg.f804ea7044a1035564362751d8e1203e.jpg

 

Maybe a better comparison would be to the many Man Utd managers that have been and gone during Klopp's stint. First 300 games:

Edited by Gnomicide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Gnomicide said:

It's all relative, isn't it? 

 

Screenshot_20240429_094020_Facebook.thumb.jpg.f804ea7044a1035564362751d8e1203e.jpg

 

Maybe a better comparison would be to the many Man Utd managers that have been and gone during Klopp's stint. First 300 games:

 

Difference is pep, jose, fergie and even wenger are multiple premier league winners.

 

Klopp isn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, thetime said:

 

Difference is pep, jose, fergie and even wenger are multiple premier league winners.

 

Klopp isn't. 

I think Klopp not being may be linked to the manager and team at the top of that list. Klopps stats win multiple premiership titles in any era other than the one he managed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I think Klopp not being may be linked to the manager and team at the top of that list. Klopps stats win multiple premiership titles in any era other than the one he managed.

You can't say that, who knows if those stats would be the same in another era. 

 

Basically he hasn't been good enough to win titles. No one is going to remember points tally in 20 years. They will remember him only winning 1 title. His return has been poor, especially with spending a billion euros.

 

Although I'm sure people will spout net and wages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO in the age of FFP, 5 subs and 5 - 10 minutes of injury time your going to get larger points totals for which ever of the sky 6 are competing for the league. That trend is only going to get worse with axing FA cup replays etc..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

You can't say that, who knows if those stats would be the same in another era. 

 

Basically he hasn't been good enough to win titles. No one is going to remember points tally in 20 years. They will remember him only winning 1 title. His return has been poor, especially with spending a billion euros.

 

You can’t say how many titles a manager wins is purely down to “how good he is”. It’s a factor, but other factors are financial power and the standard of opposition. You are correct record books don’t reflect that, but any sensible analysis should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thetime said:

 

Difference is pep, jose, fergie and even wenger are multiple premier league winners.

 

Klopp isn't. 

i'd say wenger and fergie are the stand-outs in that list, because they very clearly developed and improved players. for pep & moaniho it was clearly about the big spending. klopp spent a lot (but  often in some less obvious places [ i think that was the backroom stats guys identifying targets], but who else would have made a big plays for virgil or diogo + robertson, who's performances at previous clubs didn't suggest they could be that good.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neil said:

i'd say wenger and fergie are the stand-outs in that list, because they very clearly developed and improved players. for pep & moaniho it was clearly about the big spending. klopp spent a lot (but  often in some less obvious places [ i think that was the backroom stats guys identifying targets], but who else would have made a big plays for virgil or diogo + robertson, who's performances at previous clubs didn't suggest they could be that good.

Good point.

 

Likes of Robertson, Salah and Jota were great signings. In fact very like fergie signings and the way he did. Fergie wasn't always about signing the best players. Likes of Cantona for £1 million, Irwin from Oldham for under a million, Schmeichel for under a million and that list is quite endless. 

 

I suppose Jota from Wolves is very like Yorke from Villa.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

You can’t say how many titles a manager wins is purely down to “how good he is”. It’s a factor, but other factors are financial power and the standard of opposition. You are correct record books don’t reflect that, but any sensible analysis should.

 

It's a great misconception that fergie spent the most, of course there were years when they were.

 

He saw off Daglish and Blackburn millions.

He saw of Keegan and Newcastle millions.

He saw of Jose and Chelsea's billions.

He also raised it again against City, when utd had a very average midfield to say the least and the team ageing. 

 

Let's not forget his Aberdeen days as well. 

 

Fergie's endless desire to move forward is perhaps his greatest strength. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

I suppose Jota from Wolves is very like Yorke from Villa.

i'd say they're not the same (or perhaps my memories are wrong?) Yorke was an established goal scorer, jota wasn't he's a different player at Liverpool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

 

It's a great misconception that fergie spent the most, of course there were years when they were.

 

He saw off Daglish and Blackburn millions.

He saw of Keegan and Newcastle millions.

He saw of Jose and Chelsea's billions.

He also raised it again against City, when utd had a very average midfield to say the least and the team ageing. 

 

Let's not forget his Aberdeen days as well. 

 

Fergie's endless desire to move forward is perhaps his greatest strength. 

there was no Newcastle millions, just a circular money trail, where hall sucked money from the club and then gave it back to the club and said "look at the money I've given!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LukeCage said:

He could still be!

not if he's leaving, cant win it this year even if city and the arse implode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LukeCage said:

It's still possible this year.

arsenal have 80 points Liverpool cant get 80 points can only get 78.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LukeCage said:

Liverpool have 75 points with 3 games left so can get 84

Only one game left for Liverpool innit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...