Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Barry Fish said:

The fact you fund the whole sh*t show with a sky subscription in the first place makes the fans part of the problem.

not me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's turning into an odd fight for the places behind the top 5 as everyone just looks flawed. Newcastle, Man Utd and Brighton are all missing players and all in pretty indifferent form, yet there is still a gap to Chelsea (and Bournemouth who are now level on points with them).

I'm not going to pretend losing to Luton away is a surprise either. It's exactly the kind of faceplant we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching Liverpool - Arsenal... it seems that in the EPL, even if you're not a goalie, you're allowed to dribble the ball in your own box as basketball players do because you won't concede a penalty.

Edited by #1SzigetFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2023 at 8:22 PM, thetime said:

So the premier league is full of non English players, non English managers, non English owners, non English fans. But fans are up in arms over a European league.

Crazy really 

I think its the structure rather than it being a European league. First suggestion was obviously founder teams who are there every year which everyone kicked off over. This suggestion well if you start off in the star league its going to be very difficult to ever miss out on euro footy, you'd never get a situation where an Arsenal or Liverpool didnt get it as we have had in recent years.

I also didnt see any numbers for the teams that get promoted / relegated into the 3rd tier so say a team like Fc Copenhagen could build a semi-decent team like this year and miss out entirely.

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, lost said:

I think its the structure rather than it being a European league. First suggestion was obviously founder teams who are there every year which everyone kicked off over. This suggestion well if you start off in the star league its going to be very difficult to ever miss out on euro footy, you'd never get a situation where an Arsenal or Liverpool didnt get it as we have had in recent years.

I also didnt see any numbers for the teams that get promoted / relegated into the 3rd tier so say a team like Fc Copenhagen could build a semi-decent team like this year and miss out entirely.

The whole situation is about control. It's one thing that Barcelona sees this as the solution to their financial problems, though I'm not sure what if anything actually is, but Real Madrid now seem to be taking this as a point of pride that they can shove UEFA out of the Champions League and see this as a way to entrench them ahead of Premier League clubs as the big name in European football.

Indeed, it's the money in the PL which is why this has become acceptable to think about this idea in some corners of Europe. Though I don't think they have enough for now - the ruling itself did not say "UEFA must disband for the good of football", German and French clubs all said no, Premier League clubs are now banned from trying to join it, plus the association that represents Europe's big clubs has now begun working more with UEFA whereas in 2021 there was tension between them, and some journalists have read an interpretation of the rules is that any breakaway competition would need UEFA or FIFA to say yes, which is a turkeys voting for Christmas scenario.

It is a "who do you want to lose more" scenario imo, but I feel like the challenge of trying to make the ESL happen is, right now, a very difficult one.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/23/2023 at 12:11 PM, thetime said:

United down to 5th and 6th choice centre backs. 🤨

Never happened to any top flight club ever before, certainly not a few seasons ago.

Anyway, with today’s news they can overspend on more rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2023 at 6:16 PM, Skip997 said:

Never happened to any top flight club ever before, certainly not a few seasons ago.

Anyway, with today’s news they can overspend on more rubbish.

Just the way it is, we are in the same position we were in the 70s and 80s. The cycle will come again, it the way it is. Only 2 managers have won titles at united in over 110 years, so could be a while. 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, thetime said:

Pressure on Howe?

Next 4 games liverpool, Sunderland, City and villa. 

surely he's got a spending spree lined up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

impressed with solanke, looked like his career was taking a dive after being the hot kid at Chelsea getting the big move to Liverpool at a time when other players were hot which didn't give him much opportunity, then shipped out to Bournemouth, where it didn't go well, but he's now turned that around and is now hot as hell. Got to love a try-er.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, thetime said:

With the current FFP restrictions, I don't think they can. 

Can probably sell a few players for silly money to Saudi to get funds in to buy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thetime said:

With the current FFP restrictions, I don't think they can. 

FFP, what’s that?

That imaginary spending control thing?

Easy, just invent some imaginary companies to sponsor them, have they learned nothing from Man City?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, thetime said:

Pressure on Howe?

Next 4 games liverpool, Sunderland, City and villa. 

Comes with the territory. December has been a bit of a chore with a disappointment pile-up and I suspect losing to Sunderland in the FA Cup, which is a very real prospect, really won't help.

Most Newcastle fans I know or see are still pro-Howe and I think there's both an understanding it was going to be very difficult to match last season's top 4 finish and that having 10+ players injured/banned in all of November and the first half of December was going to be painful. Losing to Luton and Forest painful, maybe not quite that bad. Giving ex-Mag Chris Wood the scope to grab a hat-trick, including a goal of the month contender for his second, was perhaps less expected.

Just everywhere yesterday are players off it. Almiron looks spent, Gordon has been carrying an injury for a few weeks, Longstaff hasn't been good since coming back from injury, Burn & Botman have come back too soon, Dubravka has drowned as Pope's stand-in, Trippier is well known as out of form and that's for starters.

I also think we made mistakes in summer recruitment. We weren't to know Tonali was getting that gambling ban, but imo he's too similar to Bruno & Willock and was hit-and-miss before then, we needed a new right-winger more than a left in the form of Barnes (who's been injured since September anyway) and Howe doesn't seem to rate Lewis Hall enough to play him. But equally we need new players in Jan, despite us being FFP-marginal - imo a new keeper, CDM and RW are priorities. Maybe also a specialist left-back and somebody up front less injury prone than Wilson or Isak, but I think that's a summer revamp job.

You can take two sides imo. It's one thing that, two years ago today, we were 19th in the Premier League and a squad with 10 players involved against Man U exactly two years ago today is now disappointed to only be 8th seven points off the top four (least until Spurs play tonight) and narrowly falling short in a comically tough Champions League group, but equally, the last few weeks haven't been fun. It's natural some will ask questions, but I think that we just didn't have a squad big or talented enough to manage 10 games in 30 days at this time.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, charlierc said:

Comes with the territory. December has been a bit of a chore with a disappointment pile-up and I suspect losing to Sunderland in the FA Cup, which is a very real prospect, really won't help.

Most Newcastle fans I know or see are still pro-Howe and I think there's both an understanding it was going to be very difficult to match last season's top 4 finish and that having 10+ players injured/banned in all of November and the first half of December was going to be painful. Losing to Luton and Forest painful, maybe not quite that bad. Giving ex-Mag Chris Wood the scope to grab a hat-trick, including a goal of the month contender for his second, was perhaps less expected.

Just everywhere yesterday are players off it. Almiron looks spent, Gordon has been carrying an injury for a few weeks, Longstaff hasn't been good since coming back from injury, Burn & Botman have come back too soon, Dubravka has drowned as Pope's stand-in, Trippier is well known as out of form and that's for starters.

I also think we made mistakes in summer recruitment. We weren't to know Tonali was getting that gambling ban, but imo he's too similar to Bruno & Willock and was hit-and-miss before then, we needed a new right-winger more than a left in the form of Barnes (who's been injured since September anyway) and Howe doesn't seem to rate Lewis Hall enough to play him. But equally we need new players in Jan, despite us being FFP-marginal - imo a new keeper, CDM and RW are priorities. Maybe also a specialist left-back and somebody up front less injury prone than Wilson or Isak, but I think that's a summer revamp job.

You can take two sides imo. It's one thing that, two years ago today, we were 19th in the Premier League and a squad with 10 players involved against Man U exactly two years ago today is now disappointed to only be 8th seven points off the top four (least until Spurs play tonight) and narrowly falling short in a comically tough Champions League group, but equally, the last few weeks haven't been fun. It's natural some will ask questions, but I think that we just didn't have a squad big or talented enough to manage 10 games in 30 days at this time.

Yeah you got to take everything in perspective, as I have said before its going to take a lot longer than the chelsea and city models imo. Due to more stringent FFP, for me City will be the last to get away with so much with FFP. So on that score Newcastle have missed the boat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thetime said:

Yeah you got to take everything in perspective, as I have said before its going to take a lot longer than the chelsea and city models imo. Due to more stringent FFP, for me City will be the last to get away with so much with FFP. So on that score Newcastle have missed the boat.

 

everton too. 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, charlierc said:

So, Netflix is doing a 2022 World Cup documentary coming out on Saturday, presumably hoping it'll have success like their F1, golf and tennis docu-series. Be interesting to see if this becomes a recurring bit for future tournaments.

so the EPL on netflix then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thetime said:

Yeah you got to take everything in perspective, as I have said before its going to take a lot longer than the chelsea and city models imo. Due to more stringent FFP, for me City will be the last to get away with so much with FFP. So on that score Newcastle have missed the boat.

 

I suspect as well that every PL season going forward is going to be super competitive for the European places if there's going to be a rich 7 plus one or two teams more than capable of breaking into the top 6 if any of those are off colour a la Leicester's top 5 finishes in 19/20 & 20/21, Brighton last season or Aston Villa currently being in a Champions League place.

Much as Chelsea are trying to spend their way to the Championship, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2023 at 1:52 PM, charlierc said:

Comes with the territory. December has been a bit of a chore with a disappointment pile-up and I suspect losing to Sunderland in the FA Cup, which is a very real prospect, really won't help.

Most Newcastle fans I know or see are still pro-Howe and I think there's both an understanding it was going to be very difficult to match last season's top 4 finish and that having 10+ players injured/banned in all of November and the first half of December was going to be painful. Losing to Luton and Forest painful, maybe not quite that bad. Giving ex-Mag Chris Wood the scope to grab a hat-trick, including a goal of the month contender for his second, was perhaps less expected.

Just everywhere yesterday are players off it. Almiron looks spent, Gordon has been carrying an injury for a few weeks, Longstaff hasn't been good since coming back from injury, Burn & Botman have come back too soon, Dubravka has drowned as Pope's stand-in, Trippier is well known as out of form and that's for starters.

I also think we made mistakes in summer recruitment. We weren't to know Tonali was getting that gambling ban, but imo he's too similar to Bruno & Willock and was hit-and-miss before then, we needed a new right-winger more than a left in the form of Barnes (who's been injured since September anyway) and Howe doesn't seem to rate Lewis Hall enough to play him. But equally we need new players in Jan, despite us being FFP-marginal - imo a new keeper, CDM and RW are priorities. Maybe also a specialist left-back and somebody up front less injury prone than Wilson or Isak, but I think that's a summer revamp job.

You can take two sides imo. It's one thing that, two years ago today, we were 19th in the Premier League and a squad with 10 players involved against Man U exactly two years ago today is now disappointed to only be 8th seven points off the top four (least until Spurs play tonight) and narrowly falling short in a comically tough Champions League group, but equally, the last few weeks haven't been fun. It's natural some will ask questions, but I think that we just didn't have a squad big or talented enough to manage 10 games in 30 days at this time.

I agree with most of this, but isn't there a thing about a bonus payment to Chelsea if Hall plays too many games? Am I imagining that? Though you'd have thought that now is the time to play him if ever.

I think it's hard to say we needed a right-winger more than left-winger in the summer. Gordon's form was sketchy Jan-June and Almiron was just utterly brilliant in that period. Given that Barnes can play right wing as well as left, it felt like a reasonable choice at the time. 

Up front, surely there's a case to recall that Aussie striker we've got out on loan somewhere? There's been a few 17-21 year olds we've signed and loaned out and maybe the FFP solution is to play some of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...