Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

R.E.M. 1999


CardiffWanderer

Recommended Posts

Curious -

 

Would a full REM reunion and world tour be considered bigger than Oasis?

 

British centric forum, live in a bubble etc etc.

 

I’m biased but would say yes, globally. They wouldn’t do 20 stadium sized performances or whatever it is Oasis is doing in the UK, but across the US/SA/EU/Asia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamm said:

Curious -

 

Would a full REM reunion and world tour be considered bigger than Oasis?

 

British centric forum, live in a bubble etc etc.

 

I’m biased but would say yes, globally. They wouldn’t do 20 stadium sized performances or whatever it is Oasis is doing in the UK, but across the US/SA/EU/Asia

Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i got tickets for Michael Shannon's london show purely off the back of that.

 

not because i expect the band to turn up, but because i love REM and i'm always up for a good cover band and i had absolutely no idea about Shannon's band until this news popped up.

 

i've only ever seen them twice - once in hammersmith as part of some charity thing that i can barely remember, and then at Glastonbury 2003 which was one of the best nights i EVER had at the festival.

 

REM popping up with Michael Shannon... vague wisperings of them appearing at a New Jersey festival... could it possibly happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone else here go to the South Africa Freedom Day concert at Trafalgar Square in 2001? Tickets were free (via ballot). Bit of a hodgepodge line up as I recall - the likes of Hugh Masekela, Labi Siffre, Ladysmith Mambazo and also The Corrs, Atomic Kitten and Mel B. PM Tony Blair was booed, Nelson Mandela got a huge ovation, REM headlined but didn’t play for long, and as it was April it was wet and fairly cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2025 at 12:12 PM, henry bear said:

I saw them 6 times, Hammersmith Palais ‘85 and Newport Centre ‘89 probably my favourites but Glasto ‘99 was very special

I saw that Hammersmith Palais set, and the Liverpool gig a few days earlier. I miss those days, when they’d gather in the middle of the stage to decide what to play next. Best live band ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JonnyG said:

I saw that Hammersmith Palais set, and the Liverpool gig a few days earlier. I miss those days, when they’d gather in the middle of the stage to decide what to play next. Best live band ever.

They did two nights at the Palais. On the night I saw them they did covers of Have You Ever Seen the Rain, Radar Love, What’s New Pussycat? and Aerosmith’s Toys in the Attic. Place was full of Paisley Underground types. Great night 👍🏼

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was there, and I wasn't there too. I was physically in the crowd, but I wasn't there mentally speaking. Mentally speaking I talked to my mate (Shaun) all the way through the whole performance.*
 
* - I didn't have much of an appreciation of music then, and certainly didn't know that talking shite for the whole of their performance would annoy others around me. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/03/2025 at 15:17, henry bear said:

Did anyone else here go to the South Africa Freedom Day concert at Trafalgar Square in 2001? Tickets were free (via ballot). Bit of a hodgepodge line up as I recall - the likes of Hugh Masekela, Labi Siffre, Ladysmith Mambazo and also The Corrs, Atomic Kitten and Mel B. PM Tony Blair was booed, Nelson Mandela got a huge ovation, REM headlined but didn’t play for long, and as it was April it was wet and fairly cold.

Yes, I went to this. If I remember there was a long delay as a bit of the stage gave way or something, so REM had their time cut due to sound curfews. They played maybe Losing My Religion, Imitation of Life and a couple of others I think? We were stood in the sort of front put bit and the stage was built with the Lions at the front of it. I think it's all on Youtube. 

 

Love REM so much. I would have thought they'd do stadiums if they came back, if they wanted to. I know they've been spotted together alot recently etc, but I still can't see it ever fully happening, for a tour. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/03/2025 at 21:51, irnkrtn said:

1999 REM was one of the best gigs still of my life. I got there during Bush and stayed on the front row from then on. Michael Stipe touched my hand. I think that gig is why I am still there every year.

 

magic stuff. 

Touched by Michael Stipe!

 

I met him once, well, I went to a book signing, and acted like a teenager with a brief Hello exchange (I was about 30!). 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/03/2025 at 14:53, -TLR- said:

i got tickets for Michael Shannon's london show purely off the back of that.

 

not because i expect the band to turn up, but because i love REM and i'm always up for a good cover band and i had absolutely no idea about Shannon's band until this news popped up.

 

i've only ever seen them twice - once in hammersmith as part of some charity thing that i can barely remember, and then at Glastonbury 2003 which was one of the best nights i EVER had at the festival.

 

REM popping up with Michael Shannon... vague wisperings of them appearing at a New Jersey festival... could it possibly happen?

Ooh, had no idea this was coming to the UK. Bristol! Am gonna book that. 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...