Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Download 2024


FeverDream

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Spiral_Low said:

Same. But would need to know that at least Dogtooth would be cashing with main headliners to have an alternative. 

2008 actually had a fair bit for me.

43 minutes ago, gabrielomachado said:

don't see why Green Day are ruled out. They are clearly doing late summer dates in US because of Smashing Pumpkins who are touring in june 

 

also think that they are bringing SP to support in headline dates around Europe, that's why they are doing UK with Weezer

 

if anything this announcement made it clear to me that Green Day are doing a UK festival next summer instead of another stadium run

Green Day are doing a UK stadium tour ruling them completely out of Download.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s have a go… 


APEX: Fall Out Boy / Enter Shikari / While She Sleeps / Bad Omens / Creeper / Wargasm / Static Dress  

 

OPUS: Pantera / Bruce Dickinson 

AVALANCHE: The Menzingers 

DOGTOOTH: Sick Of It All 

 

APEX: Queens Of The Stone Age / Limp Bizkit / Alice In Chains / The Pretty Reckless / The Interrupters / Feeder / Cassyette  

OPUS: Five Finger Death Punch / Arch Enemy 

AVALANCHE: Bury Tomorrow  

DOGTOOTH: Thy Art Is Murder 

 

APEX: Avenged Sevenfold / Machine Head / Killswitch Engage / Spiritbox / Babymetal / Bleed From Within / Employed To Serve 

OPUS: Sabaton / The Darkness

AVALANCHE: Yellowcard 

DOGTOOTH: Periphery 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, northernangel said:

2008 actually had a fair bit for me.

Green Day are doing a UK stadium tour ruling them completely out of Download.

That's not been confirmed anywhere. The poster said EU/UK you're next, which could mean "your dates are coming next."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, I get that gigs are expensive these days but £150 for Cardiff Castle for The Smashing Pumpkins and Weezer is just insane. Other venues are way cheaper (though still like £85 which is alot) I don't get why the dramatic increase just cuz of the venue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when the next announcement is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spiral_Low said:

On a side note, I get that gigs are expensive these days but £150 for Cardiff Castle for The Smashing Pumpkins and Weezer is just insane. Other venues are way cheaper (though still like £85 which is alot) I don't get why the dramatic increase just cuz of the venue. 

The tickets for Cardiff Castle were £82.50 similar to the other venues but it seems to have pretty much sold out and so the increased prices you’re seeing are dynamic pricing or resellers at work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, nicolaspepsi said:

Fall out boy is a headliner possibility????? Come on.... That is a third o fourth level band.

Hope: Pearl jam, Qotsa, the strokes, foo fighters, the cure. Please god, something good

This is a ridiculous take. They're a solid arena level band.

 

3 hours ago, northernangel said:

I said 2025. I think they'll get them and foos

It hasn't but the sun are saying uk stadium tour.

The sun said "stadium sized." Download is stadium sized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nicolaspepsi said:

Fall out boy is a headliner possibility????? Come on.... That is a third o fourth level band.

Hope: Pearl jam, Qotsa, the strokes, foo fighters, the cure. Please god, something good

Given they were sub headlining last time they played they're a headliner. No chance of the Foo Fighters as they have a stadium tour with a date directly on Download weekend 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, northernangel said:

No they didn't, they said stadium tour of the UK. Don't try and make it into your own words in the hope they are playing a festival they do not need to ever play.

Direct quote from the article...

“A string of stadium level gigs have been lined up over the summer - it’s going to be huge.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, mikeh said:

Direct quote from the article...

“A string of stadium level gigs have been lined up over the summer - it’s going to be huge.”

 

36 minutes ago, Marka23 said:

They actually said stadium sized not stadiums 

To put it a bit more blunt for you guys to understand. A string or stadium or stadium levels gigs rules them out of download! 

Screenshot_20231020_233222_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231020_233231_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...