Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

U.S. Presidential Election


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Is there a likelihood for a surprise bigger than what's already been seen this year? The Republican candidate is someone who looked finished after being blamed for their underperformance in the 2022 mid-terms and who this year has been both convicted and shot, while the Democrat candidate is their Plan B.

it wouldn't be a surprise if I told you.

 

 

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he has endorsed Trump, something one political site claimed his wife (who is a Curb Your Enthusiasm regular) was not happy about, but one trawl of Facebook of his supporters aggregated and published by The Guardian suggests a lot of his supporters aren't happy and are considering not bothering at all.

 

Still, there's 2 1/2 months of this sh*t still to play out. Guess we'll see before then what the feedback loop is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nobody Interesting said:

One bat sh*t crazy candidate pulls out of some states and backs another bat sh*t crazy candidate.

US style Politics - coming to a country near you soon unless we all wake up.

Think US politics jumped the shark when Ford forgave Nixon, which in a way kinda paved the way for the US right to go nuts as quite a few people on the American right think Nixon did nothing wrong. Certainly I'm informed that's part of what lead to the Supreme Court ruling that basically backs up Nixon going "When the President does it, it's not illegal" as he said to David Frost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, steviewevie said:

 

So funny just how obviously unserious he is about all the Christian/God stuff. Like he clearly doesn’t give a f**k about any of it and just uses it purely as a means to get the religious vote, but a bunch of idiots have convinced themselves that he’s Jesus incarnate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steviewevie said:

US manufacturing doing badly. Helps Trump 

Whether the Trump campaign is focused enough to press home any perceived polling advantage on the economy is another question, given they seem to start focused but tail off into all kinds of weird sh*t very quickly.

 

Having an argument with the US Army over talk Trump staffers had a fight during a potentially illegal political event at Arlington Cemetery has been a dominant story in the last week, and one that hasn't exactly helped.

 

This is what's making it look strange imo. I think a lot of signs are against an incumbent (or sort-of incumbent in the case of Harris), much like we're seeing in France or Germany where the parties of the leader took a kicking in recent elections, but I still am of the opinion a Republican President would've still been likelier than the effective 50/50 polls are turning up if they hadn't chosen the candidate they have.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The words below were taken verbatim  from a campaign speech former President Donald Trump delivered in Potterville, Michigan, Thursday when he was attempting, at least initially, to criticize Kamala Harris’ record in San Francisco, presumably referring to her tenure as district attorney there:

"She destroyed the city of San Francisco, it’s — and I own a big building there — it’s no — I shouldn’t talk about this but that’s OK I don’t give a damn because this is what I’m doing. I should say it’s the finest city in the world — sell and get the hell out of there, right? But I can’t do that. I don’t care, you know? I lost billions of dollars, billions of dollars. You know, somebody said, ‘What do you think you lost?’ I said, ‘Probably two, three billion. That’s OK, I don’t care.’ They say, ‘You think you’d do it again?’ And that’s the least of it. Nobody. They always say, I don’t know if you know. Lincoln was horribly treated. Uh, Jefferson was pretty horribly. Andrew Jackson they say was the worst of all, that he was treated worse than any other president. I said, ‘Do that study again, because I think there’s nobody close to Trump.’ I even got shot! And who the hell knows where that came from, right?"

 

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-age-harris-ramble-rcna168979

He is completely mad. ... & Still they vote for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, clarkete said:

The things about election interference and how he'll be a dictator are just...mad

I'm not sure how much of a surprise it is at this point tbf. He wanted more control than he had in his first term and he essentially started that January 6th riot with the purpose of keeping himself in power in spite of an election that had a different result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I'm not sure how much of a surprise it is at this point tbf. He wanted more control than he had in his first term and he essentially started that January 6th riot with the purpose of keeping himself in power in spite of an election that had a different result.

Indeed, but that one particularly seems pretty helpful to those collecting evidence for his trial

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

Oh ffs.

 

I guess there's the debates still to come...

he could be wrong. It's a projection.

Other forecasters are more optimistic...like five thirty eight.

I think it will be close, Harris has to do more, more interviews and debates...and she needs to win arguments on the economy and immigration...they can't just rely on isn't Trump a misogynist weirdo to get them through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure that 'Trump forecast to win' makes any motivational difference anymore. People know who he is, what he's done, what he's likely to do. He's an entirely known quantity. It's got to be a positive vision thing from Harris, capture a new zeitgeist blah blah.

 

With USA politics being so overwhelmingly partisan these days I can imagine there's a lot of disinterested plague on both your houses going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

Not sure that 'Trump forecast to win' makes any motivational difference anymore. People know who he is, what he's done, what he's likely to do. He's an entirely known quantity. It's got to be a positive vision thing from Harris, capture a new zeitgeist blah blah.

 

With USA politics being so overwhelmingly partisan these days I can imagine there's a lot of disinterested plague on both your houses going on.

If Harris looks like a shoe in then anti Trump people less likely to bother voting? (see Starmer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steviewevie said:

 

 

That's clearly quoting old data and as I'm sure you've seen many of his graphs confused a lot of folks on twitter during the last week, to the degree he put an explainer in the link below, as folks were using the increase in Trump's chance as representing his actual chance
https://www.natesilver.net/p/theres-no-normal-in-this-election

Latest data here
https://www.natesilver.net/p/nate-silver-2024-president-election-polls-model

 

More recent data about the electoral college here
https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-electoral-college-bias-has-returned
 

The very interesting thing will be what happens in a couple of days with the debate and how they each come across.




 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Judging by last night at Wembley, Luke Combs should be in the conversation of headliner. The UK is having a moment with country music so I don't think it would be particularly left field either. 
    • Just listed on Twickets  
    • It feels really busy this year, loads of big groups of youngsters too. Slightly different vibe to previous years I've been. As with Tramlines, they're very chatty during sets and there's a constant stream of them in and out of the crowd... definitely feeling my age 😂   The Quarry stage I think is a lot smaller than previous years - seems similar size to Squid/Leadmill. Some sets have been difficult to get in.   I think I've reached my limit with mid-tier indie guitar bands. There's been quite a few this weekend where I've gone over to see them then walked away after 20 mins. Surprisingly, enjoyed the Fratellis set the most in this genre. Probably getting on for 20 years since I last saw them. Wasn't expecting them to do Yes Sir, I Can Boogie, which was fab!   Hugely enjoyed the Happy Mondays yesterday, and same but different with Radio Free Alice who I saw again on Friday, following Tramlines last weekend. A big run of pop acts today - Scissor Sisters will be fantastic!    
    • I have a spare campervan pass to get rid of.  unable to use Kaboodle as it is only entry that they re-sell
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...