Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Brexit Schmexit


LJS

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, eFestivals said:

People are starting to wise up. This is a good thing. :)

It's the only hope to stop us throwing ourselves off a cliff.

He was the sort of person that held the belief that no matter the result it was never going to impact him directly - which must have then allowed his non-economic political beliefs to really take hold of his thinking. 

Now that it is resulting in some of his colleagues being made redundant (one of them at a higher level than he is), that way of thinking must definitely be taking a massive hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
22 hours ago, zahidf said:

 

To criticise May for having red lines only really makes sense if the alternative negotiators would have full flexibility to agree to anything and everything.

If Starmer were negotiating for a Labour govt, would he have red lines? Yup.

And funnily enough all those red lines would be for the same things, too. Free movement, ECJ, etc.

I'll take a guess and say this geezer is only speaking out because he personally disagrees with what the red lines are or where exactly one or more of those lines is set.

Don't forget, Jez is for a hard tory brexit no different to May - while his supporters are currently doing fantastic mental gymnastics in now backing brexit and saying we need it in order to implement the Jez manifesto, or (more laughably) claim that Jez doesn't really mean it, and it's merely his ploy for creating a fuss before he becomes PM and cancels brexit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

To criticise May for having red lines only really makes sense if the alternative negotiators would have full flexibility to agree to anything and everything.

If Starmer were negotiating for a Labour govt, would he have red lines? Yup.

And funnily enough all those red lines would be for the same things, too. Free movement, ECJ, etc.

I'll take a guess and say this geezer is only speaking out because he personally disagrees with what the red lines are or where exactly one or more of those lines is set.

Don't forget, Jez is for a hard tory brexit no different to May - while his supporters are currently doing fantastic mental gymnastics in now backing brexit and saying we need it in order to implement the Jez manifesto, or (more laughably) claim that Jez doesn't really mean it, and it's merely his ploy for creating a fuss before he becomes PM and cancels brexit.

 

The ECJ is a bizzare red line, because we want the same sort of arbitration court anyway with a different name. so it just seems pointless

Having a red line on freedom of movement which means no access to the customs union or single market is stupid as well.

I dont think anyone is saying not to have red lines. Its just the UK side doesnt seem to be in unity over those, compared to the EU (Who have openly stated them)

Im not a fan of Labours current Brexit policy. The only major party whose Brexit policy i agree with is the Lib dem one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 minutes ago, zahidf said:

The ECJ is a bizzare red line, because we want the same sort of arbitration court anyway with a different name. so it just seems pointless

Is CETA governed by the ECJ (alone)? Nope. Nor the South Korea deal.

It's a political choice, not a necessity.

 

8 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Having a red line on freedom of movement which means no access to the customs union or single market is stupid as well.

I don't disagree on a personal basis ... but that's the firm Labour Party position.

It's written in a way that says that in the manifesto (tho it doesn't say it as explicitly as it could have). It was stated by Starmer before the election (but passed most people by). It's been stated clearly by both of corbyn & McD since the election, too. And the Corbyn amendment the other day makes it clear, as does the sacking of those who think it stupid enough to propose their own amendment.

Labour is for a hard tory brexit, but with the same stupid Boris "have your cake and eat it" idea the tories, at least, has wised up to being a laughable crock of the impossible. 

Labour is for a hard tory brexit.

Get used to it.

 

8 minutes ago, zahidf said:

I dont think anyone is saying not to have red lines. Its just the UK side doesnt seem to be in unity over those, compared to the EU (Who have openly stated them)

the whole premise of that tweet is that any red line is stupid.

And the UK side is in unity, as far as May has instructed DD with red lines. The only deal the EU can do with anyone is with the person put forwards to them to deal with.

The EU has no interest in the internal UK position, aside from whether the position that might be agreed between them can be delivered by the UK.

 

8 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Im not a fan of Labours current Brexit policy. The only major party whose Brexit policy i agree with is the Lib dem one

Me, I don't even agree with that one. Brexit is fucking stupid. We should stop, now.

Tho it does (IMO) need a democratic mandate to stop it, and now is probably still a bit early to get that. I do think, tho, that there's a high likelihood that public opinion is going to swing and swing fairly big.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

This is rather odd...

UK to 'take back control' of waters after exiting fishing convention

Put simply, this appears to be a revokeable-by-the-UK agreement that predates the UK's EU membership, that's with a handful of countries (that happen to be in the EU). So the UK has decided to revoke it.

So, why? And why now?

The only thing that seems to make sense is to remind the EU that there's stuff we can take away from them which gives them problems to deal with, just as the UK would have problems to deal with via a big brexit change.

-----

I happened to catch up on QT over the weekend, and saw Liam Fox boasting the trade talks start with the USA on (I think it was) the 24th July.

Which I suspect he wasn't supposed to mention - but couldn't help boasting when in a spot - because it's illegal under EU law for a member to partake in national trade talks, and with possible trade sanctions onto the country they talk with.

I really hope someone from the EU was watching. :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the comments under this article:

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/brexit-uk-may-not-actually-exit-the-eu-warn-political-sources/ar-BBDPwXb?li=AAmiR2Z&ocid=spartanntp

10354686_10150004552801856_2203675011061
 
Paco Jones
Gill you were stupid enough to read it . get a hobby ( or a toyboy ) love ...
Like · Reply · 7 · 6 hrs
10354686_10150004552801856_2203675011061
 
Paul Hill ·
Paco Jones, If your going to make a contribution, then make one. Gill hide is more than correct with her post. You are just a typo.
Like · Reply · 41 · 6 hrs
10645251_10150004552801937_4553731092814
 
Jim Johnson
Paco Jones - are you offering your services then? Or do you prefer being your own right hand man !
Like · Reply · 24 · 6 hrs
 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
10 hours ago, feral chile said:

Some of the comments under this article:

why was it only the comments about Corbyn that interested you, when the first talked of civil unrest? :blink:

And why was it only true comments about Corbyn offended you, where it was pointed out his has zero power to influence the process?

And why, under an article that's suggesting we won't Brexit - which is what you always said you supported - are you upset about comments about the hard-brexiteer that is Corbyn (just like Fox and Davis, while Boris has shown more brain than them all [which only shows how little brain is at work])?

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

why was it only the comments about Corbyn that interested you, when the first talked of civil unrest? :blink:

And why was it only true comments about Corbyn offended you, where it was pointed out his has zero power to influence the process?

And why, under an article that's suggesting we won't Brexit - which is what you always said you supported - are you upset about comments about the hard-brexiteer that is Corbyn (just like Fox and Davis, while Boris has shown more brain than them all [which only shows how little brain is at work])?

Sorry should have added a smilie smile. Thought they were witty troll put downs. Never read such a witty way to call someone a w*nker before.

My new grandson was born yesterday so I might have read them with a great deal of good humour. I know this isn't 'general news' or 'feral news' but I was a little exuberant last night.

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, feral chile said:

Sorry should have added a smilie smile. Thought they were witty troll put downs. Never read such a witty way to call someone a w*nker before.

My new grandson was born yesterday so I might have read them with a great deal of good humour. I know this isn't 'general news' or 'feral news' but I was a little exuberant last night.

Congrats  feral granny :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LJS said:

Congrats  feral granny :)

 

thanks LJS. c section yesterday and home today. Hope that's a sign of improved healthcare since 1980 when his mum was also born, though via emergency c section rather than planned. 10 bloody days. 

Anyway, I digress. I believe c sections are a European import

(keeping it relevant B) )

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

only on the basis that all of humanity to this island is. :P

But anyway, nowadays they're for the laydees who are too posh to push. Are you farming tories...? :P

Well it's her 4th. She had it on the NHS so they must have thought it necessary.

Mind, this was in England. I don't know whether they'd have agreed here. (it is a Tory seat where she lives.........)

They're still considering names - Corbyn didn't go down well :D

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

only on the basis that all of humanity to this island is. :P

But anyway, nowadays they're for the laydees who are too posh to push. Are you farming tories...? :P

I believe some c sections are for medical reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its gone by LEAVE from 'We have to do Brexit, it will be great' to 'We have to do Brexit or poor stupid people will riot'.

Also Where? All the cities voted remain. Is it all gonna go off in Lincoln or Hartleppol? Fuck them. Get the water cannons out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been rioting already about their poorly cladded tower blocks. Pain in the arse these poor stupid people they expect democracy and decent housing!!

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I can't remember who said it, but someone said something about how it would take 18 months for opinion to swing against brexit - and it looks like it's coming true.

I'm not sure torykip or labourkip are going to come out of this well.

Hope so! 

 

LabourUkip are keeping on the fence on the moment. See if they can stay on it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 hour ago, zahidf said:

LabourUkip are keeping on the fence on the moment. 

How do you get to that? :blink::lol:

The manifesto makes no commitment to the single market or customs union, and neither did Labour's 'official' amendment last week - tho they can be read as the opposite (a fudge of words that say we're leaving).

And all of Corbyn, McD, and Starmer have said we're leaving the SM & CU.

Added to the official hostility to the 'chuka' amendment last week, and the number of Corbyn disciples who are going round saying "we can't have JC's economic programme if we're in the EU" I've got no doubts whatsoever that Labour are not sat on the fence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...