Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Mercury Music Prize 2016


dentalplan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

14 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

:rolleyes: I should have seen that coming.

It really doesn't tho. There's no decent riffs, it's got no balls and goes nowhere. :)

 

I like my rock to actually have something interesting going on ;)

I agree Royal Blood and Biffy are rock though, not that I'm a Biffy fan. 

 

Still, 2 bands in the last 20 years? 

 

I think we do actually have some common ground, British rock/metal hasn't been the strongest in recent years, but there's still a dearth of rock/metal being nominated when some of the obscure shit that has been nommed exists!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, thegremlin_1999 said:

It really doesn't tho. There's no decent riffs, it's got no balls and goes nowhere. :)

 

I like my rock to actually have something interesting going on ;)

I agree Royal Blood and Biffy are rock though, not that I'm a Biffy fan. 

 

Still, 2 bands in the last 20 years? 

 

I think we do actually have some common ground, British rock/metal hasn't been the strongest in recent years, but there's still a dearth of rock/metal being nominated when some of the obscure shit that has been nommed exists!

 

 

 

Savages has no balls and nothing interesting going on yet Royal Blood and Only Revolutions do?

I'm glad they're not nominating albums that you're suggesting in that case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Savages is the only thing I like on this year's list.  The rest is just a bit meh (yes including Bowie, I just didn't get on with that albun).  Must be getting old.

I hope Bowie doesn't win... it would look too much like a token gesture.  If he was still alive I don't doubt that he would have been nominated, but I don't think he would have won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/3/2016 at 7:47 PM, Will-2609 said:

Yeah I'm really shit at keeping on top of new music and often use the Mercury shortlist to catch up. 

Our survey says....  Yes! Top points, the number one most likely thing to be said by middle class dinner party hosts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I am, I've taken an unusual amount of interest in it this year.  I think Kano should win it, myself, but there are some great records in the running.  Bowie taking a posthumous nod or Radiohead finally breaking their duck can't be ruled out, but the award is more often about the merit of the record in question rather than the career or respect of the artists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the guardian live blog: " 

  • It remains a disgrace that metal is completely ignored by the Mercury prize. A thriving, commercially successful scene that simply never gets a look-in. I asked Mercury chief judge Simon Frith about this once and his response – I paraphrase, but barely – was that he didn’t care about metal because it’s not really proper music."

Oh dear :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
    • One problem could be that many of the hospitality packages are already sold out. Unless you’ve a media contact, media organisations normally get a hospitality allocation.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...