Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Hargreaves was a solid player in his position, but far from being a fantastic player. He is one of those players that initially is underrated which results in him then becoming overrated.

Very true, also being the only half-decent player during a World Cup campaign will make you look better than you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

6 hours ago, eFestivals said:

eh? he barely kicked a ball at Utd, you can't count him. :lol:

 

The season they won the champs league he played pretty much all the time. I did not even mention Ryan Giggs as he started from the bench in the final I think. He would have walked into that Milan team.

6 hours ago, The Nal said:

Van Basten and Papin played together briefly too. That would've been unbelievable if it lasted. Van Basten was one of the first to average a goal a game over his entire career, when he was fit obviously. He played injured a lot.

Also, that Milan defence being slow is a myth. Baresi was lightning quick, as was Maldini.

None of them were as quick as Ronaldo though. Football in general was not as quick when that Milan team was in its prime. Italian football from my memory have never been quick.

Van Basten was shit hot though and Gullit was the complete footballer. Yet I still reckon that United team from 2008 would have beaten the 80's early 90's Milan team. I have not even mentioned Gary Neville or Evra yet either. As much as I hate United, that was a quality team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, eFestivals said:

Spurs to go top tonight?

West Ham do us a favour hopefully, Saying that the Scousers will be well fired up tonight so we need to look after ourselves as favours mean nothing if we don't do our own job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, eastynh said:

As much as I hate United, that was a quality team.

As much as I love Utd, it was a quality team but I disagree. They weren't as good as that Milan team. That Milan team went 58 games unbeaten, won 5 leagues in 8 years, 3 Champions Leagues in the same period, lost another two. They were in 5 CL finals out of 7.

Although if it weren't for Barca Utd probably would've done similar.

Anyway, apples and oranges. 

And yes Spurs to go top later. 

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Nal said:

As much as I love Utd, it was a quality team but I disagree. They weren't as good as that Milan team. That Milan team went 58 games unbeaten, won 5 leagues in 8 years, 3 Champions Leagues in the same period, lost another two. They were in 5 CL finals out of 7.

Although if it weren't for Barca Utd probably would've done similar.

Anyway, apples and oranges. 

And yes Spurs to go top later. 

You a United fan then mate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Nal said:

Indeed. And AC MIlan! Well, I used to be.

Why used to be??

Good stuff, should be fun anyway with the derby coming up :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Why used to be??

Sort of lost interest in Italian footie. Much like the Italians! Still have a soft spot for them. So still a fan I suppose.

Good stuff, should be fun anyway with the derby coming up :-)

Err yeah. Really feeling confident about it.......

For all the LVG love ins last week, next 8 games - Watford, West Brom, Liverpool, West Ham, Liverpool, City, Everton, Tottenham. Could be out of two cups and the Champo places in 2 1/2 weeks!

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Nal said:

Sort of lost interest in Italian footie. Much like the Italians! Still have a soft spot for them. So still a fan I suppose.

I have a soft spot for the italians but it is more to do with their plinky plonk paino house music :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Nal said:

Sort of lost interest in Italian footie. Much like the Italians! Still have a soft spot for them. So still a fan I suppose.

Think the Italian interest is still there it's more a lack of funds. 

Given the average wage, the economy in Italy, and the quality on offer, the ticket prices are ridiculously high for Serie A games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Think the Italian interest is still there it's more a lack of funds. 

Given the average wage, the economy in Italy, and the quality on offer, the ticket prices are ridiculously high for Serie A games. 

The violence outside the grounds became a huge issue in Italy. Fans getting shot before cup finals, stabbed before the Rome derby, policemen getting stabbed etc. Not something to bring to kids to! 

But yeah agree with you.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
6 minutes ago, zahidf said:

found guilty on the other charge. so no guilty on one, guilty on the other

plus the two he's already pleaded guilty to, of course.

My comment was more about the use of the words 'got off' than anything else, cos they suggest something a bit more shady than due process .... but they're also words I might use too because it's hardly unusual terminology, so I'm making a mental note to not use them unless I'm suggesting something shady.

Anyway, yep, he's guilty as charged, tho there's nothing to really suggest the word you chucked in early of 'paedo', and much more to suggest just another case of a stupid man using his dick for his brains - which plenty of us might have done to some extent i'm sure, tho not perhaps in the same manner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

I know - just fishing (says the Liverpool fan from Yorkshire (no need to reply about last week)).

I am not interested in where people come from in regards to which team they support. You pick your team for whatever reason and you stick with them through thick and thin.

I have more respect for the likes of Nal and yourself than I do for all the idiots from Manchester who spat their dummy out and fucked off to form FC United.

By rights I should probably be a rag. I come from and still live in a place called Newton Heath which is where United come from (hence eastynh), all my mates support United and my dad is also a rag. Luckily I must have been blessed with great foresight to choose City as a 6 year old. You can not imagine the shit I had to take for 25 years while City were crap and United swept everything before hand. Now the tables have turned it is utterly fantastic :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

yeah, but I think it's the law in Ireland that you have to support a team from the north east that plays in red, and he doesn't fancy the other option. :P

I thought they all supported Liverpool or United over there??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

I know - just fishing (says the Liverpool fan from Yorkshire (no need to reply about last week)).

What do you think tonight? We need to win more tonight than at the weekend. I am just waiting for the traffic to die down on the M62 and going to drive over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

I disagree with you about the FC united lot. Far more respect for them than the rest of them who just bought Norwich scarves instead. Got a lot of time for AFC wimbledon and FC united in an idealistic kind way

Mate the AFC Wimbledon and FC United situation is totally different. Wimbledon had their team stolen. FC United are a bunch of thuggish mard arses. First sign of any bother and they fucked off to set up their own team. All they do is cause trouble everywhere they go and sing anti City songs. I would not piss on them if they were on fire. The point of having a team is you stick by them through thick and thin. City have gone through far more thin than thick over the years. You did not see City fans fucking off. 

No time for FC United fans and I will raise a glass when they go bump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

I wasn't meaning to compare the situations. I meant the stand against Glazers taking the money etc. I had no idea they were supposed to be the hooligan type of fan. If that is true then fair enough. 

 

Just google FC United violence or hooliganism. The list is endless. Horrible bastards. They have a new ground which is about 2 miles away from my house. The council subsidised it while shutting down local gyms, swimming baths and god knows what other services have been cut. I do not know one person round here who goes or who has the time of day for them. They tried to build the new ground in Newton Heath, thankfully City put a stop to that as the Etihad is 2 miles away from my house the other way. 

Some idiot thought it would be good to put a new stadium full of bitter ex rags a mile away from the Etihad. Thankfully City said no chance.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, eastynh said:

I thought they all supported Liverpool or United over there??

Pretty much about right. A few Gooners too and a couple of poor bastards who support Everton.

Don't mind Neil, he gets lost once he goes north of the M4!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...