Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

The people encouraging players to dive in this instance are the referees. The large majority of the time, even if a player has lost possession, he'd need to go down in the box to get a penalty. Advantage lost? Pfft. Who cares? Certainly not the referee.

FIFA, UEFA and respective associations need to stamp this sort of horrendous refereeing out. But they haven't cared before, so why would they now?

I have no problem with the player taking it into his own hands in these instances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well I got that totally wrong. (Most probably did TBF)

Thought City would destroy Sunderland and rack up a much improved goal difference.

It will be interesting to see if Sunderland can put in a performance on the back of that against Chelsea

Tis very much squeaky bum time now and no result is a foregone conclusion. Tonight very much proved that. Liverpool and Chelsea could easily drop points. If Liverpool loose one and Chelsea draw one City can still win it if they win out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Well I got that totally wrong. (Most probably did TBF)

Thought City would destroy Sunderland and rack up a much improved goal difference.

It will be interesting to see if Sunderland can put in a performance on the back of that against Chelsea

Tis very much squeaky bum time now and no result is a foregone conclusion. Tonight very much proved that. Liverpool and Chelsea could easily drop points. If Liverpool loose one and Chelsea draw one City can still win it if they win out.

I didn't even realise there were games last night until I saw the results this morning. Blimey, they were a surprise too. :lol:

I still don't think Liverpool will win the league - tho I don't see it as impossible that they'll lose to Chelsea and still win the league. The averages say that Chelsea will drop points somewhere in their remaining games and if it's not Liverpool it should be somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I read an inteeresting article last night about whether it would be "romantic" if liverpool won the league, and whether there's anything sane in the idea that they'll have won by "cheating" because they didn't have to play in Europe.

It's certainly easier to not have those extra games, but 'cheating'? Nah. They tried to be in Europe, and they failed. You don't cheat by failing.

I'm not sure I buy the 'romance' thing; a game is a game. And yet while the Europe thing makes winning easier, if Liverpool won, how impressive that would be can be summed up in the following...

1. winning from 7th. Accepted wisdom is that it's impossible to win without first being in the top 4 to get yourself the players good enough to win.

2. having the highest ever goal-scorer in the Prem from open play (Suarez).

3. having the player with the most assists (Suarez).

4. Suarez having done that when being banned for 5 matches.

5. having (if it happens) the longest winning run of any Prem team.

6. that not a soul thought they'd win it when they were top on xmas day.

7. scoring the most Prem goals ever.

8. and this one I just love ... conceding the most goals of any team this season.

:)

They've been fabulous to watch too. I read a comment last night which said "the best team since the "invincibles", and i find it hard to disagree, at least from the angle of a spectacle to be watching.

And all done without having a complete arse as a manger - something that's not happened much at all in the last 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to laugh at the interview with Yaya Toure on Sky prior to the game at the weekend talking about "the huge advantage" LFC had in not being in the Champions League.

Sure if it was that easy Yaya!!!!!!

:D

As Neil has stated above, the notion that it is now easier to win the league by not being in Europe is hiliarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an inteeresting article last night about whether it would be "romantic" if liverpool won the league, and whether there's anything sane in the idea that they'll have won by "cheating" because they didn't have to play in Europe.

It's certainly easier to not have those extra games, but 'cheating'? Nah. They tried to be in Europe, and they failed. You don't cheat by failing.

I'm not sure I buy the 'romance' thing; a game is a game. And yet while the Europe thing makes winning easier, if Liverpool won, how impressive that would be can be summed up in the following...

1. winning from 7th. Accepted wisdom is that it's impossible to win without first being in the top 4 to get yourself the players good enough to win.

2. having the highest ever goal-scorer in the Prem from open play (Suarez).

3. having the player with the most assists (Suarez).

4. Suarez having done that when being banned for 5 matches.

5. having (if it happens) the longest winning run of any Prem team.

6. that not a soul thought they'd win it when they were top on xmas day.

7. scoring the most Prem goals ever.

8. and this one I just love ... conceding the most goals of any team this season.

:)

They've been fabulous to watch too. I read a comment last night which said "the best team since the "invincibles", and i find it hard to disagree, at least from the angle of a spectacle to be watching.

And all done without having a complete arse as a manger - something that's not happened much at all in the last 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

You think? Arsenal would need to win more games than Everton to stay fourth.

Nope. They've played the same number of games, and Arsenal are 4th.

Including the last ones... Relegation is very tight: Fulham could pull off a great escape! I think Sunderland and Cardiff are gone, and between Norwich and Fulham for the third drop.

there's more chance of a change here than for 4th, but I don't think it's changing.

Norwich ... either they'll get something from Liverpool, or it's party-time for Suarez again with another hat-trick or more, and more added to the recent-games 18-3 aggregate. :lol:

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Not really.

Yes it is.

It's around the average, I'd say.

They've had plenty of injuries to important players, but nothing for too long (and most importantly for their success, nothing that's turned out to be devastating for them).

Compared to Arsenal (yet again this season), that's easy life.

Compared to Man Utd, it's probably around the same.

(I can't say I've noticed enough of other teams to comment).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think relegation has a long way to go, can see Cardiff and Fulham picking up points in the next few games to drag WBA, Villa and Swansea properly into it. A few sides in there who really don't look like they can get a win at the moment.

Really not sure how many points Fulham need to be safe... could be as low as 3 but probably somewhere around 7-9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
    • One problem could be that many of the hospitality packages are already sold out. Unless you’ve a media contact, media organisations normally get a hospitality allocation.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...