Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

Watched bits of No Surrender when it was on, will hand it to TNA they have improved over the last year, starting to utilize talent better (though I would have prefered any of the other BFG finalists over Hardy).

I'm hoping they keep the title on Punk for another few months, the longer he has the title the more he can heel it up to a better effect, I'd go as far to say he shouldn't drop it till The Rock Royal Rumble match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Punk will drop the Title to Rock at Rumble, and Rock will hold onto it until Mania.

The whole Lawler situation is shocking and Ive spoken about it on twitter and I echo opinions that if he hadn't have had it in the arena he probably wouldn't be with us now, hope he makes a full recovery but I think his WWE days could be over.

Regarding No Surrender, it was a decent PPV, with some solid matches, didn't think Hardy v Ray was very good however. Wonder who Ray is going to face at Bound For Glory?

Looking forward to Roode and Storm going at it one more time, but they need to maintain the intensity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would actually like to see Lesnar/Punk vs Cena/HHH at Survivor Series.

I wouldn't be suprised if it ends up being Lesnar/Punk v Cena/Rock.

As much I would like to see Punk hold on to the title as long as possible, it all points to Rock vs Cena 2 for the title at WM at this point imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much I would like to see Punk hold on to the title as long as possible, it all points to Rock vs Cena 2 for the title at WM at this point imo

Either Rock v Cena or Lesnar v Triple H will happen at Mania,current planning is for Lesnar v Triple H with Cena v Rock at the Rumble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either Rock v Cena or Lesnar v Triple H will happen at Mania,current planning is for Lesnar v Triple H with Cena v Rock at the Rumble.

and the undertaker ?

I tought their were plans to make Brock vs Taker at WM.

I certainly would not like to see a rematch at WM between Brock vs HHH, there match at Summerslam was awful

Edited by A-Rob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I can piece together from various things I've read so far this summer the initial idea was for a Taker v Brock Mania match but that seems to have fizzled out.

My personal feeling is thinking about it in practicality I don't think a Brock Taker match would be all that good.Despite Brock's wrestling finesse he's not a great worker and the state Taker's body is in I doubt he could carry an entire match anymore,not for the length of time his Mania matches should last.

I quite like the idea of a Taker Ziggler Mania match but I have no idea for any conceivable fued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched Night of Champions. Decent. But SO predictable.

I guessed every single match result.

Heard about Orton getting in a heated arguement with fans at ringside where he stuck his fingers up and said I'll get you outside. What a tool.

JBL was brilliant on commentary, Cole and JBL worked superb together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent show but Punk/Cena should have continued. Same ending as Aries/Roode from Hardcore Justice.

Was a good match overall and look forward to their next match at HIAC.

Loved Ziggler/Orton but Ziggler needs to start winning some matches on PPV to look credible. Orton is leaving shortly to film 12 rounds 2 so I think it would have right to put Ziggler over. I guess it's the same as Bryan, He rarely won when he had the MITB briefcase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Raw tonight, was pretty decent. Thought Foley - Punk promo was ok, but didn't really make a whole lot of sense. Ryback over the Miz was interesting but why make it non title then hint Ryback to face Punk? I marked out at that by the way, Punk was EXCELLENT on raw, the best he's been for AGES, AJ was stale as fuck, Heyman was awful, the guy is boring the hell out of me which is crazy cus I used to love him but he's just dull and he has been for a long time.

Prime Time Players are getting over great, loving the tag division heating up, also loving they're giving teams names! Kane & Bryan are now Hell No, Sandow & Cody have teamed up and are call Rhode Schollers.

Barrett v Kidd was good, but Barrett is lacking something, before he got injured I thought he was awesome but now he's back something isn't right.

Looking forward to Impact tomorrow, new TV champ being crowned, looking like it will be between Joe & Magnus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...