Jump to content

An adult conversation about drugs?!


Guest lifelessfool
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It doesn't even matter.

s0ome academic you are, then. :lol:

It matters a lot. Either you're a liar trying to subvert this discussion with bullshit, or there's a massive govt scandal to be exposed.

Given how you won't get into detail about any of the vague things you've said, it doesn't take a genius..;)

Unless you're going to give some *real* specifics?

And if you won't, it again doesn't take a genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, or coffee or tea.

The gateway myth is exactly that. I know plenty of people who use cocaine and ketamine but would never consider smoking a spliff and have never done so. I have smoked a spliff but would never consider taking cocaine or ketamine.

The simple truth is: Every single person is different, every single person is motivated by their own experiences, tolerances, desires and needs. Trying to legislate for this is complex, our solutions in law are over-simplified as we try to apply a "one size fits all" policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 80's I was taught about the link of cannabis as a trigger for some psychoses, and it is only now that the idea is widely accepted.

the thing is, there's no less of a link with alcohol to that. Where's the fuss about alcohol, which is causing hugely more cases?

It's also the case that the total number of instances of psychosis are not really increasing - which is the real evidence in this idea. It gets to show that weed is a trigger, but not a cause; and that if weed isn't smoked the psychosis is very likely to happen anyway, triggered by something else. Weed's place in this idea is being massively overplayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing is, there's no less of a link with alcohol to that. Where's the fuss about alcohol, which is causing hugely more cases?

It's also the case that the total number of instances of psychosis are not really increasing - which is the real evidence in this idea. It gets to show that weed is a trigger, but not a cause; and that if weed isn't smoked the psychosis is very likely to happen anyway, triggered by something else. Weed's place in this idea is being massively overplayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not arguing either way. For me it is just helpful to understand the possible triggers. I think it is positive to understand the dangers with anything. There are people out there who appear to be more susceptible to some mental illnesses and giving them more understanding to possible triggers can only be a good thing. However what you do end up with is an argument of opposites. Every substance has its dangers one side wants to deny them and the other over exaggerate them.

It's a good thing for people to know the dangers of anything, but only when considered proportionally with other similar dangers.

Otherwise you end up with a fucked up society - just as we have - where the fear of crime is far greater than the actuality of crime, and those fears start to further distort society.

A great example is all of the people who wouldn't go to Northern Ireland during the troubles because "I might get blown up", and yet they had no problem at all driving their car which had thousands of times the risk of death as a holiday in NI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good thing for people to know the dangers of anything, but only when considered proportionally with other similar dangers.

Otherwise you end up with a fucked up society - just as we have - where the fear of crime is far greater than the actuality of crime, and those fears start to further distort society.

A great example is all of the people who wouldn't go to Northern Ireland during the troubles because "I might get blown up", and yet they had no problem at all driving their car which had thousands of times the risk of death as a holiday in NI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing is, there's no less of a link with alcohol to that. Where's the fuss about alcohol, which is causing hugely more cases?

It's also the case that the total number of instances of psychosis are not really increasing - which is the real evidence in this idea. It gets to show that weed is a trigger, but not a cause; and that if weed isn't smoked the psychosis is very likely to happen anyway, triggered by something else. Weed's place in this idea is being massively overplayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drugs aren't the problem. Drug use is often a symptom of a problem, whether sociological or psychological.

This gateway bollocks assumes that everyone has the same conditional constraints and the same psychological needs and desires. It's the kind of positivist theory I'm on about. The government and the law bases itself on this type of w*nk.

Models pertaining to social constructivism are by far the best. People turn to certain behaviours, such as taking whatever drug, as an expression of something. Sometimes it's to identify with a criminal out-group culture as an expression of feeling outcast, sometimes it's as an opiate to numb the banal reality of their miserable existence. And so on and so forth. It's really fucking obvious if you just stop to think a little. The government have no way of applying this to law though as it's too complicated and costly. There ya are. Nailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was based around the ex squaddie and the swathing assumptions they made on air about the effect on other military men. I do question his own honesty, but rather than discuss his motivations before hand it was just accepted that soldiers would resist the process. Given that this is supposed to be "scientific" and something the powers that be will point to, I would have thought they would have given more thought to their comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't a couple of the problems the belief that "I'll be able to handle it" and also the view of many young people that they're virtually indestructible? As you get older and start going to a few more funerals you become much more aware of your own mortality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...