Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Rugby World Cup 2011


Guest JC-Mo'Fucka

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As a Wales fan very happy with our start, I thought today was a potential banana skin and certainly not complacent but we have put ourselves in a position to qualify.

The Ireland result has also opened the draw up. Look like the knockout could split one half with the best of the six nations and one with the best of the rest. If at the start if the tournament you had offered me a win against Ireland then England/France to get to the final, I would have bitten your hand off and an sure the other 3 would say the same. Since the last world cup there hasn't been a dominant European team and all 4 have shown they can beat each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really liking the minor games, the last two days with Italy vs Russia and Japn vs Tonga have provided some quality entertainment. Good to see Italy able to put some set pieces in to action, shows how much they've improved since they first played in the 6 nations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_union/15041494.stm

I have to admit that I find the maths for this tournament a bit complicated. However isnt there another scenario where scotland beat england by 8 points and argentina win with a bonus point which would put scotland through and england out. I dont expect it to see scotland in the qf but if they did manage it, wouldnt this be the most likely scenario?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://news.bbc.co.u...on/15041494.stm

I have to admit that I find the maths for this tournament a bit complicated. However isnt there another scenario where scotland beat england by 8 points and argentina win with a bonus point which would put scotland through and england out. I dont expect it to see scotland in the qf but if they did manage it, wouldnt this be the most likely scenario?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bit about the world cup thats really fucking me off is the simple fact that my club (Leicester) has 12 players out (first teamers for the most part, and one bench player) and yet we still have to play the second best club in the league (saracens, they finished SECOND in the actual league afterall..) who have 2-3 out...

how is that in anyway a level playing field? how does that benefit me and the other 13000 leicester season ticket holders by watching my 2nd and a half team (what with the 7-8 players out long term injured too) get stuffed by sarries first team? indeed how does it benefit the league when the whole thing is skewed towards teams (like sarries) who're just full of mercenary south african thugs instead of producing talent to the home nations... (ok, so we have 2 argentinians, an italian and a samoan out too)

apparently Leicester wanted to play the LV cup during the world cup period (a sensible suggestion i'd say) but were shot down by the other 9 premiership clubs.

it aint just leicester either, saints are really struggling due to actually generating good home nations prospects as opposed to buying in...

ok, rant over, but its a situation thats going to rear its head again come 6 nations time, the clubs like leicester and saints that produce good home nations talent are penalised for producing good home nations talent whereas the likes of the soulless saracens succeed by buying success!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bit about the world cup thats really fucking me off is the simple fact that my club (Leicester) has 12 players out (first teamers for the most part, and one bench player) and yet we still have to play the second best club in the league (saracens, they finished SECOND in the actual league afterall..) who have 2-3 out...

how is that in anyway a level playing field? how does that benefit me and the other 13000 leicester season ticket holders by watching my 2nd and a half team (what with the 7-8 players out long term injured too) get stuffed by sarries first team? indeed how does it benefit the league when the whole thing is skewed towards teams (like sarries) who're just full of mercenary south african thugs instead of producing talent to the home nations... (ok, so we have 2 argentinians, an italian and a samoan out too)

apparently Leicester wanted to play the LV cup during the world cup period (a sensible suggestion i'd say) but were shot down by the other 9 premiership clubs.

it aint just leicester either, saints are really struggling due to actually generating good home nations prospects as opposed to buying in...

ok, rant over, but its a situation thats going to rear its head again come 6 nations time, the clubs like leicester and saints that produce good home nations talent are penalised for producing good home nations talent whereas the likes of the soulless saracens succeed by buying success!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its also very unfair that the final games of each group are on different days. Its a big advantage for wales going into the last game against fiji knowing the exact score they need because samoa will already have played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know of any other major tournaments that don't play the final group games simultaneously. As you said, its to maxkimise tv revenue, but to the detriment of the tournament as its possible to now get final group games that could be dead rubbers while having meant something if played at the same time as the other games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why they don't just play the rugby world cup in the summer. Though I suppose whenever you play it, there will be scheduling clashes depending on what hemisphere you are in. The one clear advantage that playing the tournament in the summer has is that it broadens the number of countries that can host the thing - football stadiums can be used in the summer, which might be of use if the IRB wants to bring the World Cup to other countries to broaden rugby's appeal.

Edited by Istari
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By summer you will be meaning the northern hemisphere summer? Therefore that will clash directly with the Super 15 competion and more importantly the Tri-Nations tournament. If it is the southern hempisphere summer then it would likely clash with the Six Nations. By playing the WC in Sept/Oct it is more of a compromise, coming at the end of the southern hemisphere season and the start of ours.

The use of football stadiums is not an issue in South Africa, Australia na New Zealand, where they have a lot of large, dedicated rugby stadia. Whereas in the UK and France (less so) the club stadia are not large with usually only the national stadiums being of great size. So in 2015 the matches may be palyed in football stadiums or given to other countries like the 1999 RWC that was officially held in Wales but had games in England, Ireland, Scotland and France.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't it be played during super 15? What's the difference to devaluing their domestic competition to ours?

Best thing in my eyes is to do what has been suggested more than once by people and play the season in blocks, this season for instance play LV cup during world cup. Then play first half of prem games the euro groups back to back, then the rest of the prem games and the euro knockouts. Finish in march with the euro final. Scrap the godawful play offs. Then play the 6 nations on back to back weekends April to mid may...

Would that be so difficult? And it will solve all the club vs country arguments and mean teams like Leicester and saints don't get punished for NOT buying foreigners instead of generating young home nations talent...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Super 15 is their version of the Heineken Cup rather than the Premiership. I do agree with the idea of playing in blocks and getting the LV Cup played at the start of the season. None of the teams take it overly serious and if they removed the qualification for the Heineken Cup if an English club wins as an incentive then it will be worthless.

However, its unlikely to change as it largely down to the TV scheduling why the season is so unstructured

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The result today in south africa v samoa confirmed my feeling regarding the unfairness of playing the final group games at different times. If wales had played today they would have had to go for the win knowing that the other game was competitive. Now they can play a second string side and take a loss if necesary. It seems a bitt against the spirit of the tournament. Still cant see us beating ireland though, I cant remember us ever winning a knockout in the rugby world cup. If only they had played the tournament in the 70s!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking forward to the european side of the draw. There has been very little between the 4 teams since the last world cup with each winning one six nations title each, I checked the tables and in terms of match wins in those 4 tournamnets its france 14, ireland 13, wales 13, england 12, it couldnt be much closer.

As a wales fan Im happy with our form and happy to play ireland, I dont think either team expected to get further than the qf at the start so the pressure is off and if wales lose next weekend then I will throw my support to ireland and hope they win the tournament. As alway Im very worried about England they seem to be able to get results in world cups without playing amazing which is very dangerous. In fact I looked at the last 2 world cups and england have managed to get a 1st and a 2nd scoring only 3 tries in total in knockout games, only 1 more try than wales and we have only played 1 knockout game to englands 6! I dont mean that as a criticism, englands style of play may not always have been to my taste but in terms of winning matches in clearly works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carter out of the World Cup and McCaw injured. Will the wheels fall of the All Blacks as they get closer to the final?

England really need to pull their finger out and sort out some sort of tactical ideas as we were bereft of much in the Scotland game and were lucky at the end. Going into the game against France it is impossible to tell who will win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank fuck that Johnson has dropped Tindall and gone with Flood at 12 (even if it was injury forced or not). Tindall has done more off the field than on it.. This will give us more options in the backs. Not too sure about Easter in for Haskell and would have probably dropped Stevens for Corbisiero. Interesting going with 5/2 split in the replacements, might end up with Croft playing in the backs if we suffer to many injuries to the backline!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an excellent start to the day (as a Welsh supporter). My niece is married to a former South African player and I once asked him who he cheered for when South Africa weren't playing and he replied "Whoever is playing England." But following that approach I'll have now to change alliegances. After cheering France, who deserved their win, I'll have to wish them a bit less luck in their next match. I think Wales will have a tough time against them in the semis, particularly with injury problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

england were piss poor in the 1st half, deserved to lose tbh - especially with the amount of times flood chucked the ball in the air and france gained possession from it.

hope wales beat france though, would be nice to see a home nation in the final

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...