Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

Most Utd fans I know, including myself, can't stand the way sky fuck about with the fixtures, the season started nearly two months ago and the match against Norwich on Saturday was our first home game at 3pm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

You’re right, it doesn’t make any sense – because that’s not what I said.

What I said was that you don’t hear the fans complaining about it when the TV money contributes heavily to them buying quality players and facilities. Do you think if push came to shove, Utd fans would prefer to go to a match on Saturday evening, or whatever time is considered inconvenient, to see a load of old shit, in a shithole stadium or to see quality players in a quality stadium?

Its a chicken and egg thing.

I completely appreciate the impact this has on smaller clubs by the way but Wigan proved it can be done. By pulling the carpet from under the clubs, you're ensuring what Wigan did can't be done again, with respect to TV revenue anyway.

300 million fans worldwide have to be catered for. Its business suicide to ignore them.

Would you rather watch Wayne Rooney, Phil Jones and Nani on Sunday at 4pm or watch Russell Beardsmore, Remi Moses and Ashley Grimes play at 3pm on Saturday? Because thats the choice, so to speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. "Competition" its called. Its a good thing and its the reason we watch the game.

Take QPR. They want to get Beckham in, mainly for business reasons in Asia. QPR would obviously have to be on the telly there to make it work and start to build a fan base. Thats good business. Makes perfect sense. Shows ambition. I've no problem with that. More exposure for them, more TV money.

Are people saying that we should now pull the ladder away from ambitious clubs like QPR looking to grow their fan bases after 20 years of Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool etc creaming off the top? How is that fair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Do you think if push came to shove, Utd fans would prefer to go to a match on Saturday evening, or whatever time is considered inconvenient, to see a load of old shit, in a shithole stadium or to see quality players in a quality stadium?

The stadium could have been upgraded long before, but instead the people who ran the club you think you love decided they'd prefer to fleece you. Hate them for it, and no one else.

The quality of the play hasn't improved despite the money having increased hugely. The proof is within the fact that English teams do no better against teams from elsewhere in the world than they did 30 years ago.

;)

300 million fans worldwide have to be catered for. Its business suicide to ignore them.

no it's not. They were ignored for 100-ish years, and the football businesses were no more stable or unstable than they are now.

Would you rather watch Wayne Rooney, Phil Jones and Nani on Sunday at 4pm or watch Russell Beardsmore, Remi Moses and Ashley Grimes play at 3pm on Saturday? Because thats the choice, so to speak.

No it's not. It's only the choice when there's money in one country but not others.

So ultimately, what you think is awful is what your choice about things is inflicting on others while you're allowed to enjoy the cream. ;)

Some people love the game the football. Others only love their club and themselves. ;)

Only one side of this has a footballing future - and it's not the selfish side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

They do no worse either.

agreed. So we're now agreed that all of the extra money has made no difference on the pitch - and so that can cease to be any part of your defensive of money over football.

The rest of your post was your standard ABU stance which I wont respond to as the conversation isn't relevant to Utd alone.

PMSL :lol:

I've not mentioned Utd. I've said "the club you love", but that's just as applicable to any supporter of any club who's stadium was almost falling down because the owners would rather pocket the money than upgrade.

If I'd meant Utd and specifically Utd I'd have said Utd. :rolleyes:

The driver for the upgrades wasn't actually the Prem anyway, but the Taylor report - so that's no part of the argument either.

Oh, apart from suggesting I'm only a Utd fan and don't love the game. Couldn't be further from the truth but I don't feel the need to qualify myself. :)

If you loved the game above your club then you wouldn't have a narrow "I'm alright Jack" view based on the fact that you club seems to be fine while others are dragged thru the shit - and dragged thru the shit specifically on what your club (and a handful of others) demanded was done for their own enrichment but not for the good of the game. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd argue that football standards have improved over the last 20-odd years. Not because of money and globalisation of talent, but because of fitness and training regimes. Messi's not jinxing round defenders who crawled back from the pub via a chippy at 3am that morning, he's jinxing around much healthier, fitter players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I was getting to a hell of a lot more games years ago before sky started fucking around with the fixtures and I'd love it to go back to them times, now Utd get a sat 3pm home kick off once every couple of months I can only get to a handful of games, in the past we'd go maybe every other week

You’re right, it doesn’t make any sense – because that’s not what I said.

What I said was that you don’t hear the fans complaining about it when the TV money contributes heavily to them buying quality players and facilities. Do you think if push came to shove, Utd fans would prefer to go to a match on Saturday evening, or whatever time is considered inconvenient, to see a load of old shit, in a shithole stadium or to see quality players in a quality stadium?

Its a chicken and egg thing.

I completely appreciate the impact this has on smaller clubs by the way but Wigan proved it can be done. By pulling the carpet from under the clubs, you're ensuring what Wigan did can't be done again, with respect to TV revenue anyway.

300 million fans worldwide have to be catered for. Its business suicide to ignore them.

Would you rather watch Wayne Rooney, Phil Jones and Nani on Sunday at 4pm or watch Russell Beardsmore, Remi Moses and Ashley Grimes play at 3pm on Saturday? Because thats the choice, so to speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I'd argue that football standards have improved over the last 20-odd years. Not because of money and globalisation of talent, but because of fitness and training regimes. Messi's not jinxing round defenders who crawled back from the pub via a chippy at 3am that morning, he's jinxing around much healthier, fitter players.

true - but the money side of things hasn't much changed the differential between the different leagues. That was what I was getting at with what I said (I of course can't speak for others).

And those words need a further caveat to avoid a further comeback. Some leagues have risen and some have fallen, but that's to be expected over time - they've never all stayed at the exact same level thru the years, there's always some natural variance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea how much money Shamrock Rovers are getting from TV in the Europa League? Or how much they got for the match last week? For a club the size of Rovers, its a massive amount. Massive. Do you want to deny them that opportunity? I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't want people watching the game outside of the UK? Have you any idea how much money televised football brings into the economy? How many pubs are open purely because of televised football?

Do you want to throw that away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

You don't want people watching the game outside of the UK? Have you any idea how much money televised football brings into the economy? How many pubs are open purely because of televised football?

Do you want to throw that away?

I thought I'd already made perfectly clear my views on people outside the UK watching? I don't mind by default, but don't believe that a desire to watch English footie should be to the detriment of the game within their own countries - which it always is.

Televised footie brings less into the economy than it would if people went to games instead.

It's defo true that more pubs would shut without footie. But that's not really anything to do with footie, it's to do with a move away from going to pubs to going to other places instead (or nowhere instead).

You don't think the quality of football has improved over the last 30 years?

not relative to a generalisation of all leagues, it hasn't.

I haven't narrowed it down to "I'm alright Jack". Quite the opposite. I've clearly stated that by removing TV money from football it would cut out any other clubs, like QPR or Wigan, from climbing the ladder that the big clubs have already done. It removes opportunity.

and yet the movements of clubs up and down the leagues in the past gets to show it was easier in the past than it is now.

Any idea how much money Shamrock Rovers are getting from TV in the Europa League? Or how much they got for the match last week? For a club the size of Rovers, its a massive amount. Massive. Do you want to deny them that opportunity? I don't.

It's not that I want to deny them that opportunity, I want to give them the greater opportunity of having a sustainable league of quality football - which is what they don't have now, and never will do thru the few crumbs getting thrown their way if they get a lucky draw while all the fan interest is overseas.

They'd stand a greater chance of earning more proprtionally against other clubs in all countries via what I'm saying, and give them a better chance of actually competing rather than being there to make up the numbers.

They might have less actual money by my method, but they'd have a greater spending power because of the reduced spending power of Prem clubs. The amount of money a club has isn't the be all and end all - there's more to it than just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

true - but the money side of things hasn't much changed the differential between the different leagues. That was what I was getting at with what I said (I of course can't speak for others).

And those words need a further caveat to avoid a further comeback. Some leagues have risen and some have fallen, but that's to be expected over time - they've never all stayed at the exact same level thru the years, there's always some natural variance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you not understand that if Shamrock hadn't have received a fortune from TV from the Tottenham game, they would still have made a relative fortune anyway. For if they didn't get TV money, because there was no TV deal and therefore nor did any other club, the money they received from the ticket revenue would have been a fortune too when compared to others' income.

Nothing has changed bar the number of zeroes.

£100,000 from one game when your turnover in a season is £600,000 is a big prize.

However, £10,000 from one game when your turnover in a season is £60,000 is still a big prize.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Well it's driven La Liga to a pure duopoly. Obviously there's always been an element of that, but it's driven it up.

yup - and while we're not in danger of the exact same thing happening just yet (only 'just yet', it'll happen sooner or later :() because of our TV rights being sold collectively, a similar almost-fixed dominance by a set of particular clubs is happening and spoiling the game as a competitive sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing has changed in Rovers ascent in the last five years, no. Apart from the new stadium they have to pay for, the jobs, spending, feelgood factor and pride they've created in Tallaght in Dublin (not a privileged area of the city), the extra staff they've taken on, the knock on jobs that have been effected/created, the people in the pubs in Dublin watching the big games that they couldn't afford to go to, the tax the TV companies pay to the Irish government, the jobs Sky and the TV companies create around the country, the jersey sales, the shop in the stadium that sells the merch, employs people and pays tax, the extra public transport laid on in Tallaght now which stimulates the local economy through increased footfall, more shoppers, people staying in hotels, a new nightclub opening up, house prices sustaining rates on par or in excess of similar areas and people buying newer and better TVs to watch the games on as opposed to not watching or going to the games.

Thats off the top of my head.

Apart from that though, no, nothing has changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yup - and while we're not in danger of the exact same thing happening just yet (only 'just yet', it'll happen sooner or later :() because of our TV rights being sold collectively, a similar almost-fixed dominance by a set of particular clubs is happening and spoiling the game as a competitive sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=soccer/11/10/05/manual_083434.html&TEAMHD=soccer&BID=165

'Arry and Van Der Vaart exchanging complaints in the media.

Amuses me when a player thinks he's too good to do defensive work, and then has a go when the manager brings on a player who will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Very nice to read your review.  Here's mine.  I enjoyed it all so much that I bought a pre-sale ticket for 2027!   ____   WOMAD FESTIVAL 23-26 July 2026  Neston Park, Corsham, Wiltshere   Womad is back! The festival took a year off last year to recalibrate. They were moving to a new location, and no doubt the fact that so many festivals have ceased to exist as a result of financial problems in the current climate made it important for Womad to get things right going forward. And did they! The festival was a resounding success. Sold out, with brilliant music and smiling faces all around.    From 2007 until 2024 the festival was held at Charlton Park in Wiltshere. I went there six times.  Sometimes the festival clashed wth Cambridge Folk Festival, but since the pandemic I have found myself preferring Womad. It offers greater diversity. There are acts from all over the world and I feel I can trust the organisers to come up with stuff I will enjoy.    The new site is a beauty. Neston Park is an estate near Corsham.  Melksham is the nearest train station; Bath the nearest bigger town. The Real World studios are nearby in the village of Box. The weather was again very warm and the site thankfully has many shaded areas with trees. The camping fields offer enough space that people do not need to camp on top of each other. There are four main stages and best of all, programming is such that there was never any sound overspill. Toilets were mostly of the compost variety. The food I sampled was delicious, albeit expensive, and they had very nice Clear Head alcohol-free beer on tap, which predictably ran out on Saturday.    I went as an Oxfam volunteer, which benefits a good cause and was enjoyable as ever, but I have to admit that it was killing me how much I was missing that I wanted to be at, due to having to work. I was not able to participate in the many interesting workshops and presentations on offer. I am planning to go as a punter next year, and volunteer elsewhere where the lineup is less crucial. My shifts were in the camping fields. This was relatively easy due to the Womad festival goers being very well behaved (“You can’t go that way“; “Oh, I see”). I enjoyed spending time up on the fire tower, from where the view was great.   Peter Gabriel made an appearance at the World of Words stage. Lopa Kothari was on compere duty on the World Stage (the main stage), and for me a most welcome addition was Justin Adams compering the second stage - the Big Top. Justin is a fantastic guitarist who has collaborated with and produced many world music greats (Robert Plant, Tinariwen, Souad Massi, Sharon Shannon). Justin is so knowledgeable and enthusiastic, it was a real joy to have him in the Big Top all weekend, and I liked his unshouty style of presenting.   These were my musical highlights:   1. GANAVYA (India) - Big Top   Singer Ganavya is from New York, of Indian heritage, and she spent many years living in Tamil Nadu. The first striking thing when she walks onstage is how pregnant she is. She explains she is eight months. At times it looked like there might be a Womad baby. Ganavya is accompanied by a harpist and a cellist. Stunning music and great storytelling too. She is a graduate from Berklee College of Music and has worked as a teacher as well, which is evident from her engaging talk. She reminded me of Arooj Aftab, mostly because of her dry and self-deprecating sense of humour. Her show ended with a wonderful singalong traditional, the high point of the entire festival for me. I will certainly seek her music out further.   2. SEPPUKU PISTOLS (Japan) - World Stage   The Seppuku Pistols are an anarchist punk group with traditional instruments. There’s thirteen of them, different ages. They started in the middle of the crowd and then made their way over to the stage. Many of the members play percussion. The leader is an older guy, who spoke at length and with great conviction in Japanese, before yelling “translate!” to a band member. There was so much going on, sometimes you didn’t know where to look. I was near the front, but band members frequently went with instruments and all into the moshpit. At the same time someone could come crowdsurfing overhead. Apparently one of them broke his ankle, didn’t realise and finished the gig. “I think you all need to go and decompress”, Lopa Kothari said to the audience once it was over. Everybody left the main stage with big smiles, shaking their heads.   3. GANNA (Ukraine) - Sunflower Tent   Ganna is a Ukrainian singer, based in Berlin. She performs solo, standing behind a table with equipment. This is never my favourite set-up, however her voice, songs, stage presence and stories were so remarkable that I can get over the lack of a proper band. My shift partner saw her at the ‘Taste the World’ stage and told me she is equally good without the box of tricks. Her singing is not unlike Sámi joiking. Ganna’s singing was so impressive that everyone (finally!) stopped talking. Her music is an intriguing mix of traditional songs over very contemporary electronics. She spoke about the situation in Ukraine, including some very personal stories. I would have loved for this show to have been longer.   4. OUMOU SANGARÉ (Mali) - World Stage   The only artist on the lineup that I had seen before. The “Songbird of Wassoulou” has continued to release quality albums and I knew this was guaranteed to be good. Oumou was the final act on the main stage on Sunday; a fitting end to the festival. Her band are a mix of Mali-based and French musicians; the keyboardist stood out in particular. Oumou looks positively regal to begin with, but loosens up once she takes off her high heels. She addresses the crowd mostly in French. Sound was exceptionally good for this gig, though it has to be said it was good on the whole, with the exception of the Sunflower stage, which was a bit muddled at times.   5. FRESHLYGROUND (South Africa) - Village Stage   Freshlyground are an Afropop band from Capetown, who have been around since 2002. After seeing several performers with laptops on stage, it was a relief to see such a seasoned band with real instruments (I love the flute). The band’s long-time singer went solo in 2019, and they are now fronted by 20-year-old Mali Makhoba, an very charismatic singer who describes herself as “just a girl from the township”. This is a very uplifting gig that draws a huge crowd to the relatively small Village Stage. They finish with their hit ‘Waka Waka (This Time For Africa)’, which they recorded with Shakira on vocals for the World Cup in 2010.   6. MÁDÉ KUTI (Nigeria) - Big Top   Son of Femi Kuti, grandson of Fela Kuti. 30-year-old Mádé Kuti is a multi-instrumentalist, singer and bandleader. He has a stellar band with him, including two energetic dancers, and together they put on a fabulous show. I saw Femi Kuti on the Womad main stage a few years ago, but I have to admit I enjoyed Mádé more. He pays tribute to his father and grandfather (he covers ‘Trouble Sleep Yanga Wake Am’), takes his place amongst the brass section so that other band members can solo, and brings his reluctant wife on stage for a dance (“She hates it when I do that!”).   7. SABINE MCCALLA (USA) - Village Stage   Sabine McCalla is from New Orleans, of Haitian descent, and the sister of Leyla McCalla, who played a great set at Womad 2024. Sabine is accompanied by a guitar player and her laid-back songs are perfect for an early afternoon set in near tropical weather. “Aligators are circling round Lake Pontchartrain”… I love that line from her song ‘Baby please don’t go’.   8. ANNIE AND THE CALDWELLS (USA) - World Stage   More music from the South, this time from Mississippi. Annie Caldwell played Womad a few years ago with the Staples Junior Singers. This time she has brought her family band, with three of her daughters singing. It is a slightly slicker affair and I have to admit I thought the gospel from the older group was even better.   9. MOHAMMED REZA MORTAZAVI (Iran) - Big Top   Mohammed is a percussionist extraordinaire. He plays an entire one hour set on a Persian drum that looks not unlike a bodhrán. It is incredible how many different sounds he gets out of this single instrument, just by using his two hands. His was a late show and by that time I had been up since 5 a.m. so I was struggling against sleep a little.   10. RUST (Lebanon / Syria ) - Sunflower Tent   Rust are Petra from Lebanon and Hany from Syria. They are based in Prague and they call their music electro tarab. I like Petra’s vocals very much, but would have loved to know a bit more about the songs. Hany stands behind a deck with equipment. Many of the songs build and build and end in banging techno, which goes down well at the midnight slot they occupy. Do check out their EP ‘Masaf’.   Disappointment:   Tian Qiyi (UK).  A band of two brothers, sons of Jah Wobble. Their mother is Chinese and there is a strong Chinese influence in their music. I had listened to their album ‘Red Mist’ and had high expectations, but found them disappointing live. The guys were playing and singing live, but everything else was recorded.    Would liked to have seen: Yegor Zabelov, accordion (Belarus) Bitoi, Scandi-folk with electronica (Sweden) Lemoncello (Ireland) Stafford Campbell (UK) Yasmine Hamdan (singer from Soapkills, Lebanon)   Heard good reports from fellow volunteers about: Barrington Levy (reggae/dancehall veteran, Jamaica) Wild Wild Women (hip hop girls from Mumbai, India) Ta Dhom Project (hip hop with percussion, India)   Womad 2027 will be from 23-26 July. www.womad.co.uk for tickets.   Helen.
    • Yeah I've seen the news he's off to Arsenal and do have a lot of musings. As said, it really feels like if tapping up was something people cared about that this could have potential to be seen as such at least, but I also agree that this summer, the board have been too feeble in resisting interest in our best players and need someone better able to tell the big fish to do one like others have. It's particularly galling as it feels that Arsenal showed a lot of disrespect with the use of intermediaries to do dirty work and the first offer that was pretty much what we paid to sign Bruno from Lyon 4 1/2 years ago.   It's definitely grating as well that Bruno seemed to go all in on making out he wanted to be a hero then pretty much used some of Isak's tactics to force an exit. Which means he's probably earned boos when Arsenal come to Tyneside in November. I'm not saying that for grandstanding - players come and go and I have no doubt Arsenal are offering more money and more chances of trophies in the next 2/3 years. But the player hasn't helped himself imo.    But it is what it is. This is a pretty extreme reset and means that every decision as far as incomings goes has to be flawless. Whether I'm expecting it to be so after last year's debacle is of course another matter. At the very least the belated new manager will have a lot to do. In a way I think it's a good thing it won't be Howe trying to replace Bruno though given our record without him was so bad and the tactical choices feel like they may end up leaning into a style that worked with him had Howe stuck around. 
    • Weezer just announced a May tour so that's them ruled out.
    • Blimey, I thought it wasn’t going as well due to the pricing and as it didn’t fly out ticket sale day.    Incredible that people are paying it, not had a good album in about 20 years now. Quite disappointing at those prices as it’ll keep climbing if people keep paying unfortunately. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...