Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

I can understand why Liverpool don't want to play their semi on the Sunday. However I'm not sure its fair forcing chelsea to play Sunday with a champions league match possibly on the Tuesday. Is it right that chelsea should be disadvantaged to accommodate Liverpools desire not to play on the date of hillsborough? I feel that chelsea should take priority for the Saturday game and move the Liverpool one to another date if they don't want the Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

Bit of a daft argument about liverpool fans travelling down to wembley, they have as many glory hunter fans around the country as united. Im sure everton fans would love a day out at wembley.

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand why Liverpool don't want to play their semi on the Sunday. However I'm not sure its fair forcing chelsea to play Sunday with a champions league match possibly on the Tuesday. Is it right that chelsea should be disadvantaged to accommodate Liverpools desire not to play on the date of hillsborough? I feel that chelsea should take priority for the Saturday game and move the Liverpool one to another date if they don't want the Sunday.

Edited by strummer77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

It hasn't been created solely by money. No clubs success ever has. But that's not the point

OK, I was perhaps just a little off with that.

But there's no difference on the money front with City's attempt to buy success. Any difference between the two club's success at this point is down to the manager's - there's no difference on the money front apart from City having had a recent injection and trying to do it quickly. Where both teams are in the league is more to do with money than it is any other factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TICKET DAY FIASCO!!!!

anyone a season ticket holder to Everton? I'm a customer got my registration but not the requisite home game tix this season! Can send you my 3 numbers (for family)

This morning was a nightmare!

Multiple open windows and the time out due to high demand - meant multiple purcheses on differenet regs - and a slow system trying desperately to cancel ordered tickets to get down to three - 50 minutes later got down to just 3 - one on my, my wife and daughter's registration numbers - only to find I don't have the required home ticket stubs! gutted!

forget buying glasto tix that was way more stressful - I'm sweating cobs!

Anyone a STH with the required stubs - in the coming days - able to buy me 3 on my numbers? Pm me if so!

Edited by 5co77ie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a nightmare Scottie. You get sorted?

See Stephen Ireland says hes open to coming back and playing for Ireland. A detestable twat of a man but much better than anything we currently have in midfield. Andrews and Whelan.

Duff, Ireland, Keane and Doyle going forward might not be that bad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

So whats this mystery foot injury Aguero has picked up? Mancini wouldn't comment on how he got it but he may miss the Arsenal match.

I've just read the beeb's report of it, and it sounds like it's something caused by another player in training - which happens of course.

It's defo looking like the title is Utd's to lose now.

I've just had a look at the Arse's fixures, and only the City and Chjelsea games look like real toughies for them, tho they're at home for both of those. They've got a few away ties that might prove tricky for various reasons, but with them on form they're looking good for 3rd.

Looking at Chelsea's fixtures, Spurs should be good for 4th .... then again, their form has fallen off a cliff, so who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Tommy Smith miss a European Cup final because he dropped a sledgehammer on his foot?

Is it definitely a foot one? When I heard Mancini wouldn't disclose it I wondered if it was something embarrassing, like when that French player missed a game in the WC through piles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I was perhaps just a little off with that.

But there's no difference on the money front with City's attempt to buy success. Any difference between the two club's success at this point is down to the manager's - there's no difference on the money front apart from City having had a recent injection and trying to do it quickly. Where both teams are in the league is more to do with money than it is any other factor.

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

if money is the major factor how come liverpool are in 7th?

because, as The Nal pointed out, and had me correct myself, it's not the only factor.

Who was the last 'un-moneyed' club to win the league? The Prem has never been won by an un-moneyed club, and off the top of my head I'd guess at it being Forest in the late 70s (tho perhaps my memories are wrong).

So, we have moneyed clubs, and we have 'top managers'. The facts get to prove that top managers don't always win the league but that moneyed clubs always win the league.

So money is the most important factor. As City gets to prove and others proved before them, money is a guarantee of nothing - but it's very definitely a pre-requisite in today's game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because, as The Nal pointed out, and had me correct myself, it's not the only factor.

Who was the last 'un-moneyed' club to win the league? The Prem has never been won by an un-moneyed club, and off the top of my head I'd guess at it being Forest in the late 70s (tho perhaps my memories are wrong).

So, we have moneyed clubs, and we have 'top managers'. The facts get to prove that top managers don't always win the league but that moneyed clubs always win the league.

So money is the most important factor. As City gets to prove and others proved before them, money is a guarantee of nothing - but it's very definitely a pre-requisite in today's game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yeah, I think it's important to differentiate between a stage that's just a platform for the artist to walk on (which can be assembled fairly quickly and without too much difficulty), and the custom staging that you get in big productions where there's a whole world underneath.   Using the Eras tour as an example the stage extending out into the stadium field has all sorts - lifts that go up or down - down most importantly as this allows performers to enter or to leave the stage as needed. There's passageways to get from one part of the stage to another. There's what are effectively dressing rooms set aside for costume changes. There's spare instruments (and techs to look after them) so if something goes wrong above they can be swapped out in the space of seconds. There's even a track and dolly system running the full length of the stage so that Taylor can be moved from one end to the other faster than she'd be able to walk.   I don't know the specifics of the Madonna tour to the same degree but my understanding is that a lot of the same techniques are used.
    • Wow just got myself some Megadeth tickets and not sure I can afford another set of tickets for another gig so soon but we'll see. Fingers crossed
    • Can't speak for Dua Lipa's, but Coldplay's was vastly scaled down compared to their stadium production staging though, and tracks were adapted to reflect that. MOTS tour had a full walkway 30m out to the B-Stage in the middle of the crowd, and two C-Stages. Glastonbury didn't accommodate that at all and just had a very small walkway in front of the Pyramid stage, and (IIRC) a disconnected B-Stage.   Which re-enforces my point. Acts can adapt their stage shows if they really want. Most do, some don't want to. Glastonbury might miss out on the odd act that doesn't want to slightly adapt, but so will most festivals.   
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...