Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

I'd say you're being a little unfair to Carra, if not also to Gerrard.

Carra puts his idea of Gerrard being one of the best within the context of him not having played in a great team with great players for any of his career - which is true, and means that he doesn't have the medals to match the normal tally of a player of his calibre.

Off the top of my head (soz if this is wrong TGT) I don't think that Bobby Moore has a league winner's medal (and perhaps no other domestic medals either), but he's got to rate as one of the best players this country has produced (even if as a defender he's not the sort of glamour player which come instantly to anyone's lips).

He's of course looked on fondly by the English in almost all directions as the man who lifted the world cup so people give him the credit of being one of the best despite the lack of domestic medals, while Gerrard doesn't get such wide admiration because his own glory is related to 'just' his club so fan tribalism kicks in. And yet, because of the impact he had in that CL final he's certainly a player of huge impact (even if you don't think he won it by himself ass some do) - because his impact for Liverpool has been that huge very often over the years.

Perhaps Gerrard isn't as good as Carra says, but he's got a more than decent reasoning behind him reaching that conclusion, I'd say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

  • Admin

so what happened to winning fergie a trophy that he hasn't won yet? :P

People go on about how Rooney's a great player. Drogba was a monster for Chelsea the other night while Rooney was a mouse last night, yet Drogba doesn't get half the praise that Rooney does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Drogba is capable of disappearing in games as much as anyone and his antics are a disgrace.

true, and he was up to his 'tricks' again the other night. But he's a monster player at his best, and I don't reckon Rooney ever gets close to that.

Rooney didn't give a shit last night. either did Fergie. Can you imagine Utd losing 2 nil in the league and Fergie taking off Rio, Carrick and Giggs? I've never seen that before.

yeah, Fergie didn't give a shit but played his no.1 striker. :lol:

C'mon, take your blinkers off. If he didn't give a shit he'd have played other players. He clearly hoped it could be won, even if he didn't put out the strongest team he might have (I'm not sure if he did or didn't, I only watched snatches)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me even though drogba isnt the same player he was a couple of years ago, I would rank him at the best big game players of recent premiership years. Rooney can sometimes be a bit hit and miss for me in the big games. Look at the 3 championship leagues final and despite a goal his performances havent been up to the level of what i would expect from one of the world top players. However look at the premiership and he seems to find a goal when man utd need a goal in a game when they are looking short of ideas he often seems to find one, man u certainly would be nowhere near city without him this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • There is a chance that Norton's reaction was very much like our reaction, because people in this country tend to think 'big = Glastonbury'.   Having said that, though, I'm fairly sure they've gone for her again this time, and it's broken down. Whether it's only just broken down or not, I'm not sure, but I'd air on the side of - they thought they had her, up to a certain point.
    • Yeah, I did wonder if they might be getting too big for Piece Hall now. Wet Leg did Castlefield this year and were subbing them at Tramlines. Wishful thinking! I'd happily see them do another outdoor headline in the north of England, wherever it might be (except R+L, which I'm def too old for now 😂)
    • You've certainly got a bunch of American acts who absolutely adore the festival and are willing to bring peanuts for it. You can never discount The Killers on that basis.
    • Law unto herself, Madge. But I think, for a certain generation, Hyde Park still has a touch of mystery and magic - that and Wembley Stadium.
    • I personally think Glasto big slots mean more to British artists that American ones don't (except Rodrigo, Killers, Foo Fighters) - in recent years anyway. The chance to pay (for a lot more money) to more of her own fans for 3 nights at BST must be more appealing to Madonna.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...