Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

  • Admin

The problem is with his team mates now. They've obviously kept it all secret for the last 2 months, in order to stop in breaking up team morale. Rooney's camp have now decided that it's time to stir things up publically to get a move in place. Having come out and effectively said his team mates aren't good enough, then playing him is going to make it very difficult on the pitch. As has already been said, their real problems this season have been at the back.

Must admit to enjoying watching Evra looking so pi$$ed off :D

have they kept it secret for two months? Not according to Rooney.

But anyway, I get all of that - and I'm sure it's not passed fergie by either. All the same, fergie has stated he'll still play him.

Which, rather amusingly, is an agreement of sorts with what Rooney has said about the strength of the squad. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nal's take on this is bang on the money. Wodgeson has just lost the dressing room with this load of cock. At the moment it seems to LFC fans that Woy's only friends seem to be his back slapping blame Rafa merchant mates in the media and Alec Furguson. This "sources close to Ferguson" non-story about Torres to Utd serves only to destabilise us further (if that is even possible) and to embolden MUFC fans. Woy should have said exactly what 'Arry said last night about Bale. "He's not for sale." But no - the dithery aul c*nt put his big foot in it again. Rumours are that Rikjaard takes over on Monday so I won't have to bother even referring to this clown again. The only thing left for him to do is make inflamatory remarks about Hillsborough before he goes.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole Rooney thing is ace, we've been able to laugh at Liverpool for months and now we can do it with Utd too! :lol:

hahahahhahahahhahahhahahhahahahhaha

I would love to see him join City, it would be truly hilarious

Personally, I reckon its fair enough and certainly not surprising in the slightest. He left Everton to win stuff and now he feels like he has do so at Utd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised at your take on the situation SP. Youre usually a little more level headed mate. Dunno if youre hung over or taking the piss though guv. LFC don't sell our best players to Manchester United. Youve no vested interest in our best players though either mate, right? However if we might just sell our goalie to you if youre extra extra nice though. Go on. Throw in a "cheeky" bid with a pwitty pwease Mr. Henry attached. 8 mill should do the trick. We need the finances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I would love to see him join City, it would be truly hilarious

Personally, I reckon its fair enough and certainly not surprising in the slightest. He left Everton to win stuff and now he feels like he has do so at Utd.

Yep, me too.

Utd are going to have happen to them what they've been happy to make others suffer. The outrage being shown flags up the double standards clear as day. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Regarding Torres to United, I agree it wouldn't happen. What I could see though is him possibly going back to Spain, and then Higuain for example going to United.

While Spain seems a very obvious option, when you start to consider 'what club?' it gets harder to see him going there.

He won't go to Real, that's for sure. And other than Barca, I don't think any other Spanish club could afford him or his wages.

So that really only leaves Inter overseas, tho I'm not sure he's a big enough Rafa fan to want to do that.

So it's back to the UK. I agree, and don't think he'd accept Utd even if they made a good offer. So that means Shitty or Chelsea really, doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nor does ralph. Fergie thinks different, as he made clear last night.

It's no surprise to me, cos amongst everything else around Rooney, Utd need to perform on the pitch else Rooney's take on where Utd are going certainly becomes the reality.

If fergie's words are true, then Fergie's been happy to play him for the last two months, and no one has been doubting Rooney's commitment and effort over that time, only his form. And form is temporary.

Nothing has changed with any of that with things becoming public, the only thing that has changed is the perception of Rooney from the likes of you and me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

yeah form is temporary. like i said yesterday when it would make the title race interesting if man city signed a happy rooney.

unhappy players don't make for good players though as this has shown. don't see why his form is going to improve in 2 and a bit months. along with a niggling ankle injury.

I agree that unhappy players don't normally play well. But all the same, fergie has come out and stated that he's prepared to keep playing him, just as he kept playing Tevez when it was clear that Tevez was going to leave.

And the simple fact is that both of those things point towards Rooney having a reasonable point when he says he's lost confidence in Utd being able to have a strong enough squad to win things.

As I've said, I'm not surprised that fergie is still prepared to play him. Utd's form so far this season has been below what people expect of them, and the only realistic hope of a big improvement in the short term is Rooney on form - and he'll only get that form if he's played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that unhappy players don't normally play well. But all the same, fergie has come out and stated that he's prepared to keep playing him, just as he kept playing Tevez when it was clear that Tevez was going to leave.

And the simple fact is that both of those things point towards Rooney having a reasonable point when he says he's lost confidence in Utd being able to have a strong enough squad to win things.

As I've said, I'm not surprised that fergie is still prepared to play him. Utd's form so far this season has been below what people expect of them, and the only realistic hope of a big improvement in the short term is Rooney on form - and he'll only get that form if he's played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that unhappy players don't normally play well. But all the same, fergie has come out and stated that he's prepared to keep playing him, just as he kept playing Tevez when it was clear that Tevez was going to leave.

And the simple fact is that both of those things point towards Rooney having a reasonable point when he says he's lost confidence in Utd being able to have a strong enough squad to win things.

As I've said, I'm not surprised that fergie is still prepared to play him. Utd's form so far this season has been below what people expect of them, and the only realistic hope of a big improvement in the short term is Rooney on form - and he'll only get that form if he's played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

i suppose that's a point, but do you really see it happening?

I think looking at things the other way around says more: that it can't and won't happen is he's not played.

plus, what if someone tears into him and has him injured for 7 or 8 months. that's a windfall for man utd out the window as all the teams will just wait for next again window, or worse still, the following january.

Well, i'd guess that if Utd have the ambition that they'd like people to be thinking and have the money to do it, and if they're serious about not wanting to lose Rooney, that would work to their advantage - he's be out of the picture while they prove to him their ambition via some signings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Untied allways start slowly though and come good about now but I think they are going to struggle to break into the top 4 this year. As for Rooney I think he is a gone come Jan as its been clear even during the world cup that something wasent right.

Just Hope they dont come good till after Sunday please :ph34r:

yep, they do normally start slowly, and without this Rooney saga I'd fully expect them to improve. But of course a part of that improvement would have come from Rooney getting back to nearer his best.

So I can see the dilemma for Utd with all of this. Don't play him and have a big risk of sliding, or play him and still perhaps slide.

Of those two options, I can see why fergie thinks that playing him is the better way to go - tho of course it's quite possible that the decision they'll take today will be to not play him.

I agree about him going in January if Rooney doesn't have a change of heart. I can't see what other option they really have .... tho of course getting a decent offer in January is far harder.

But if they sell him, they need to sign one or more too, because they certainly need to demonstrate that Rooney's take on things isn't correct, otherwise it'll become true by default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...