Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The XX


Talcroft

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Johndenis said:

(they're obviously crap and it was pretty baffling that the Lumineers esque hey-ho acoustic shtick got such big traction - shame on the public). 

This. It’s like putting some mid Devon pub jam night regulars on the Pyramid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I always assumed with Mumford that they blasted a daft amount of money on The Stones that year, so Mumford would have agreed to take a 'lesser' fee.

 

Complete guess, based on nothing, mind.

Edited by mufcok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mufcok said:

I always assumed with Mumford that they blasted a daft amount of money on The Stones that year, so Mumford would have agreed to take a 'lesser' fee.

 

Complete guess, based on nothing, mind.

I suspect it was a ME booking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mufcok said:

I always assumed with Mumford that they blasted a daft amount of money on The Stones that year, so Mumford would have agreed to take a 'lesser' fee.

 

Complete guess, based on nothing, mind.

 

Thing is even the "standard" fee for headliners being reported at the time (£250k) was far less than what pretty much any of those acts could get elsewhere.

 

They allegedly paid the Stones 750k as an exceptional case, and it was suggested they were the first act to get more than standard. But I doubt it affect what the other headliners got, just because an act like Mumfords would already have been cutting their fee massively even to get to 250k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Mumfords were f**king massive when they headlined. Their songs had crazy amounts of radioplay and interest from the general public.

 

I don't like them but it's revision-history to think they were selected as an underplay cheaper option like XX would be.

Edited by FrogLobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, FrogLobster said:

Mumfords were f**king massive when they headlined. Their songs had crazy amounts of radioplay and interest from the general public.

 

I don't like them but it's revision-history to think they were selected as an underplay cheaper option like XX would be.

 

Yeah this! Mumfords were in a different league of size to what The XX were, are and will be. I didnt think it sat right though and I really liked them then. But even as someone who finds The XX boring and thinks they make the top of any major festival look weaker, they would still sub Pyramid or headline other. One of those you've cheated out getting, one you haven't. 

Edited by northernangel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...