Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2025


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, djym12 said:

0% chance Twenty One Pilots are coming (even though I said the same thing for Rocky, but still..)

funfact, their support act is coming, Balu Brigada. if you like Twenty One Pilots you'll might like this one too, bit more poppy, bit more boring, but the same genre, could be an alright set to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kristofm said:

funfact, their support act is coming, Balu Brigada. if you like Twenty One Pilots you'll might like this one too, bit more poppy, bit more boring, but the same genre, could be an alright set to watch.


In 2019, 21P were all over the place. I think they came to Europe in 3 separate occasions. Currently they have no summer dates. And even though they come to Europe in the spring, based on 2019 it’s not impossible.

 

Also their support band is here.

 

Also Sziget liked a comment about wanting to see 21P.

 

Also we are still severly lacking sreious undercards. 
 

I would say this could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Akujin said:


In 2019, 21P were all over the place. I think they came to Europe in 3 separate occasions. Currently they have no summer dates. And even though they come to Europe in the spring, based on 2019 it’s not impossible.

 

Also their support band is here.

 

Also Sziget liked a comment about wanting to see 21P.

 

Also we are still severly lacking sreious undercards. 
 

I would say this could happen.

But they said that's the complete list of headliners. 😞 They definitely won't be subs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kristofm said:

But they said that's the complete list of headliners. 😞 They definitely won't be subs.


Wdym they were subs in 2019. (Don’t come at me about co-headlining because it’s basically the sme as subbing) Armin van Buuren is sub…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Akujin said:


Wdym they were subs in 2019. (Don’t come at me about co-headlining because it’s basically the sme as subbing) Armin van Buuren is sub…


What do you think is more likely from Sziget, having them as a sub, or at the same spot but as a co-headliner? I think they would put them into a co-headliner spot, which is why they are not coming, there will be no more headliners. They're at least as big as ASAP Rocky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Akujin said:


Wdym they were subs in 2019. (Don’t come at me about co-headlining because it’s basically the sme as subbing) Armin van Buuren is sub…

 

There at the level of a mid sized headliner. They headline festivals, but if a festivals have a big head liner they will sub. 

 

Examples from sziget 2019 backs that up. More so there summer festival tour of 2022 where they subbed werchter, mad cool and headlined opener. 

 

Is there anyone they would sub at Sziget? Don't see it myself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kristofm said:


What do you think is more likely from Sziget, having them as a sub, or at the same spot but as a co-headliner? I think they would put them into a co-headliner spot, which is why they are not coming, there will be no more headliners. They're at least as big as ASAP Rocky.

 

They would headline, Sziget post covid doesn't have depth of lineup to have them as sub in 2025. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you look at the number of acts announced on each day so far compared to last years completed lineup, we have about half of the undercard to come. The issue is I don’t see why they’d wait to announce a significant number of well known acts. I suspect it’ll be mostly small names going forward but hope I’m proven wrong

IMG_0152.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thetime said:

 

They would headline, Sziget post covid doesn't have depth of lineup to have them as sub in 2025. 


We don’t know yet. It’s not the same owners this time around. KKR could invest significantly. I’m not saying they will or have but it was a massive aquisition so they could pump some money to get attraction.
 

Look at the “subs” so far. If we even have two per day at a level of where Boris, Justice, Armin, Papa Roach and Nelly are, we are missing so many relatively big names still.

 

Not saying 21P defo one of them but I’m hopeful regardless. This line up can be massive if we get the level of the 7th in terms of star power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CS2110 said:

When you look at the number of acts announced on each day so far compared to last years completed lineup, we have about half of the undercard to come. The issue is I don’t see why they’d wait to announce a significant number of well known acts. I suspect it’ll be mostly small names going forward but hope I’m proven wrong

IMG_0152.jpeg

I think we will probably get three or four mid-sized names and then lots more smaller names.

 

Who the mid-sized names will be is anyone's guess. 

 

Judging by the line-up so far (with the exception of Papa Roach) I'd say it unlikely we are going to get 'adult' acts like Snow Patrol and Vampire Weekend etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CS2110 said:

When you look at the number of acts announced on each day so far compared to last years completed lineup, we have about half of the undercard to come. The issue is I don’t see why they’d wait to announce a significant number of well known acts. I suspect it’ll be mostly small names going forward but hope I’m proven wrong

IMG_0152.jpeg


I’m thinking they might actually have a bigger second stage, and some of these names are headlining that. And so we might have a stage announcement with many of those strong names coming to that stage. 
 

My guess is Armin and Justice headlining that stage but we are missing the other 4. 
 

This makes sense to me because I can’t picture Armin either as a sub or party arena, and I also can’t see Justice fitting in the Revolute tent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Akujin said:


I’m thinking they might actually have a bigger second stage, and some of these names are headlining that. And so we might have a stage announcement with many of those strong names coming to that stage. 
 

My guess is Armin and Justice headlining that stage but we are missing the other 4. 
 

This makes sense to me because I can’t picture Armin either as a sub or party arena, and I also can’t see Justice fitting in the Revolute tent.

Exactly. I think the Party Arena part will change, maybe they get a bigger tent, or some kind of a bigger spot. Like a mini Balaton Sound within the festival itself. Maybe they will also have a separate stage for rock/"live music" artists that's going to be headlined by Papa Roach etc, because having them before Charli would be weird (although Billy Talent supported Pink so nothing's impossible)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Akujin said:


I’m thinking they might actually have a bigger second stage, and some of these names are headlining that. And so we might have a stage announcement with many of those strong names coming to that stage. 
 

My guess is Armin and Justice headlining that stage but we are missing the other 4. 
 

 

Bigger stage? Certainly not an open air one, with the stipulations on finishing times. 

 

Whilst your angle of thought would be fantastic, I just don't see it personally. I think people are perhaps getting a bit side tracked by the changes angle. 

 

They could/should be picking up acts that are doing Oya/WOW. Especially as Sziget runs on dates, that are not traditional for festivals(fri-sun).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CS2110 said:

They’ve just posted on instagram that Co Lee is playing the revolut stage on the 7th August. Guess we still don’t know if the revolut stage will continue in its current format though 

So far it looks like the current format (Main Stage, Revolut, Party Arena, Colosseum...) stays and they just got rid of Global Village.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thetime said:

 

Bigger stage? Certainly not an open air one, with the stipulations on finishing times. 

 

Whilst your angle of thought would be fantastic, I just don't see it personally. I think people are perhaps getting a bit side tracked by the changes angle. 

 

They could/should be picking up acts that are doing Oya/WOW. Especially as Sziget runs on dates, that are not traditional for festivals(fri-sun).

 


It would exactly make sense because of the curfew.

 

Because there are DJs that are too big for party arena but too small for headliner spot for the main stage. So it makes sense to have these dj-s closing out another stage at the same time. So they can also have a proper headlining slot.

 

Imagine while Shawn Mendes is putting people to sleep at the main stage Justice is ripping up the balaton sound stage where party arena used to be.

 

Probably won’t happen but it would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Nikky said:

Headliners are much stronger than last 2 years. Anyway, anyone saw I hate models lately? I have a chance to see them next week still not decided. 

 

Saw I Hate Models twice in Copenhagen (once in a club and then on Distortion) and it was absolute f*cking madness both times. One of the best hard techno acts I experienced. The energy was next level, can't wait to see him again on Sziget!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in my opinion the quality of a festival should be measured also by the quality of the names rather than just how many hits they have on Spotify. For example: last year Louis Tomlinson and Halsey were really disappointing as live acts, and the crowd was kinda bored imo. And Halsey has got a huge number of listenings on Spotify. She was also at her First headline spot, as She stated. On the contrary smaller acts like Fontaines DC smashed It. I think that this year the quality of live acts Is better. I'd rather have Wet Leg than Kings Of Leon for example ahaha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Emotin said:

in my opinion the quality of a festival should be measured also by the quality of the names rather than just how many hits they have on Spotify. For example: last year Louis Tomlinson and Halsey were really disappointing as live acts, and the crowd was kinda bored imo. And Halsey has got a huge number of listenings on Spotify. She was also at her First headline spot, as She stated. On the contrary smaller acts like Fontaines DC smashed It. I think that this year the quality of live acts Is better. I'd rather have Wet Leg than Kings Of Leon for example ahaha.

Fair point, and I agree.

 

Problem is, we haven't got Wet Leg OR King's of Leon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, @Sziget2025_Leaks has just revisited as he liked my comment about his visit being fleeting a few pages back. Is there anything you can tell us @Sziget2025_Leaks?

 

For example:

 

- are we going to get a Wet Leg, Vampire Weekend, Prodigy etc type announcement or is that it now for known names?

 

- are there subs missing or are you not working that way this year?

 

- when are announcements re: staging coming? Same question related to night-time changes?

 

- how are ticket sales going?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...