Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2025


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

I just watched some concert footage from Charli's "BRAT" tour, I might be wrong, but looks to me like she does not use a live band. So even though she is a huge booking and a big deal, might still be cheaper than a live band with full kit. I'm sure that factors into the booking decisions, big name for less than a big band. Makes sense.

 

If the new Sziget Main Stage has a bigger video display (which I assume will happen because of the Anyma booking) then booking Charli is right in line with the new direction.

 

For my part, Anyma looks like a guy working an office job in front of an IMAX screen. Clearly I am not the target audience anymore, and that's fine, they should go after what twentysomethings want, and they must want Charli performing solo in front of video screens, using collabs for a big pop. 

 

At this point, I wonder if Papa Roach is even playing the main stage, or headlining some new smaller "Rock" stage....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, gunghoglen said:

I just watched some concert footage from Charli's "BRAT" tour, I might be wrong, but looks to me like she does not use a live band. So even though she is a huge booking and a big deal, might still be cheaper than a live band with full kit. I'm sure that factors into the booking decisions, big name for less than a big band. Makes sense.

 

If the new Sziget Main Stage has a bigger video display (which I assume will happen because of the Anyma booking) then booking Charli is right in line with the new direction.

 

For my part, Anyma looks like a guy working an office job in front of an IMAX screen. Clearly I am not the target audience anymore, and that's fine, they should go after what twentysomethings want, and they must want Charli performing solo in front of video screens, using collabs for a big pop. 

 

At this point, I wonder if Papa Roach is even playing the main stage, or headlining some new smaller "Rock" stage....

well, dj's don't have a band and they are expensive 😄 so probably they paid a lot for an autotune karaoke show with occasional dancing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gunghoglen said:

I just watched some concert footage from Charli's "BRAT" tour, I might be wrong, but looks to me like she does not use a live band. So even though she is a huge booking and a big deal, might still be cheaper than a live band with full kit. I'm sure that factors into the booking decisions, big name for less than a big band. Makes sense.

 

If the new Sziget Main Stage has a bigger video display (which I assume will happen because of the Anyma booking) then booking Charli is right in line with the new direction.

 

For my part, Anyma looks like a guy working an office job in front of an IMAX screen. Clearly I am not the target audience anymore, and that's fine, they should go after what twentysomethings want, and they must want Charli performing solo in front of video screens, using collabs for a big pop. 

 

At this point, I wonder if Papa Roach is even playing the main stage, or headlining some new smaller "Rock" stage....

 

She's supposed to be one of the greats performers live. A lot of amazing reviews from the media, music stars and your general punters. 

 

Totally understandable she's headlining. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ReljaGajić said:

I checked the numbers on instagram, the lineup announcement has 260K views, Anyma 132K, Charli 172K and Chappell 468K. It looks like that Chappell is a good booking after all 🤷‍♂️ 


I mean I’m sure she is a good booking coz apparently she is doing well on Festivals. But I wouldn’t read too much into like Instagram views. This depends on many factors. Also if you look at Facebook, she has abojt a 100 likes, Anyma has 270. On Instagram it’s the reverse. Not necessarily indicative of crowd size either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ReljaGajić said:

I checked the numbers on instagram, the lineup announcement has 260K views, Anyma 132K, Charli 172K and Chappell 468K. It looks like that Chappell is a good booking after all 🤷‍♂️ 

i checked her stuff out and now i can't get that sh*t out of my head

 

h o t t o g ooooo you can take me hoooot to gooo

 

heard it twice and there was no coming back. it's like baby shark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, kristofm said:

i checked her stuff out and now i can't get that sh*t out of my head

 

h o t t o g ooooo you can take me hoooot to gooo

 

heard it twice and there was no coming back. it's like baby shark

The next step is to learn the dance haha

h-o-t t-o g-o 💃🏻 you can take me hot to go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thetime said:

 

She's supposed to be one of the greats performers live. A lot of amazing reviews from the media, music stars and your general punters. 

 

Totally understandable she's headlining. 

I've actually seen Charli live, she opened for Taylor Swift on the Reputation tour. She did a good job, I thought she would go on to bigger things. Clearly she has, she deserves the headlining spot, just wish there was more of a "live music" vibe rather than "club music". 

 

Looks like Chappell has a live band, so the main stage they are building must be able to accommodate bands, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gunghoglen said:

I've actually seen Charli live, she opened for Taylor Swift on the Reputation tour. She did a good job, I thought she would go on to bigger things. Clearly she has, she deserves the headlining spot, just wish there was more of a "live music" vibe rather than "club music". 

 

Looks like Chappell has a live band, so the main stage they are building must be able to accommodate bands, too.

 

I think the changes have been over played to be honest. I don't see that much, certainly not as much as people think.

 

Are they going to invest the money? Are they going to get stuck in between the rocks? 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thetime said:

 

I think the changes have been over played to be honest. I don't see that much, certainly not as much as people think.

 

Are they going to invest the money? Are they going to get stuck in between the rocks? 

Agree. It’s gone from 60/40 split of live music to EDM, to 40/60. They’ve changed the focus towards more EDM, but it’s not exactly become Tomorrowland overnight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RookieJur said:

maybe stupid question but isnt it logical that more DJ's are on the line up as they are expanding the night life?

You're probably right but, as I've stated earlier in this thread, it's not right that we should be second-guessing the organiser's intentions. They should be laid out as part of a marketing strategy when creating such a shift.

 

We have some semblance of an idea because of Leaks but your average punter might well be very pissed off if they've bought tickets and are now wondering if this is the right festival for them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, gunghoglen said:

I just watched some concert footage from Charli's "BRAT" tour, I might be wrong, but looks to me like she does not use a live band. So even though she is a huge booking and a big deal, might still be cheaper than a live band with full kit. I'm sure that factors into the booking decisions, big name for less than a big band. Makes sense.

 

If the new Sziget Main Stage has a bigger video display (which I assume will happen because of the Anyma booking) then booking Charli is right in line with the new direction.

 

For my part, Anyma looks like a guy working an office job in front of an IMAX screen. Clearly I am not the target audience anymore, and that's fine, they should go after what twentysomethings want, and they must want Charli performing solo in front of video screens, using collabs for a big pop. 

 

At this point, I wonder if Papa Roach is even playing the main stage, or headlining some new smaller "Rock" stage....

Re: giant screens, Taylor Swift has finished her Eras Tour this week - those screens have got to go somewhere!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I am the only one, but i kinda enjoy that sziget lineup always surprise me (in a good way) with some not so known gems, thats the real purpuse of this festival, to explore new artists, bands and genres, at least for me..  im happy with lineup so far, i am already very excited about chappell, nelly furtado, boris brejcha, (anyma?), blossoms and i would check up the rest artists as well…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Akujin said:

What are you guesses for the last three headliners then?

 

my hopium guesses are as follows

 

BMTH or QotSA

ASAP Rocky or Prodigy

Post Malone or Fatboy Slim

 

Do BMTH have a decent following in Europe? I always underestimate how popular they are in the UK because I don't see the appeal. Would much rather we got QoTSA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, So Sad Simon said:

Do BMTH have a decent following in Europe? I always underestimate how popular they are in the UK because I don't see the appeal. Would much rather we got QoTSA.

Forget BMTH, RaR/RiP and Reading+Leeds are their only shows in Europe this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, So Sad Simon said:

Do BMTH have a decent following in Europe? I always underestimate how popular they are in the UK because I don't see the appeal. Would much rather we got QoTSA.

 

Yeah they headline in Europe also. 

 

QOTSA will probably fulfill there obligations from last year, they cancelled OYA/WOW and have been confirmed for solen. All run through Sziget, so I'd say no. 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably going to sound like a stupid question... is the main stage finish time down to organisers or noise restrictions past a certain time?

 

Was thinking of the possibility of a main stage DJ on after the headline act each night to "expand the nightlife". Obviously that's probably impossible (a. due to budget, and b. contract agreements), but in an ideal world it would appeal to all parties (except maybe the locals🤣).

 

Wishful thinking? Yeah that's never going to happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aokdub said:

This is probably going to sound like a stupid question... is the main stage finish time down to organisers or noise restrictions past a certain time?

 

Was thinking of the possibility of a main stage DJ on after the headline act each night to "expand the nightlife". Obviously that's probably impossible (a. due to budget, and b. contract agreements), but in an ideal world it would appeal to all parties (except maybe the locals🤣).

 

Wishful thinking? Yeah that's never going to happen

 

Noise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So last year we had nine headliners

 

Wednesday - Kylie

Thursday - Halsey

Friday - Stormzy/Liam Gallagher

Saturday - Martin Garrix

Sunday - Janelle Monae/Sam Smith

Monday - Skrillex/Fred Again

 

So that’s roughly split into 3 dance acts, 3 commercial pop, 2 RNB/Hip hop and 1 indie/rock

 

My guess is:

 

Wednesday - Charli XCX

Thursday - Central Cee/Tiësto

Friday - Post Malone

Saturday - Hozier/Anyma

Sunday - Queens of the Stone Age/Fatboy Slim

Monday - Chappell Roan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...