Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

International Politics


kalifire

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Crazyfool01 said:

whats Trump up to ? are we going to wake up to another war ? or is he going to bomb Iran again 😞 

looks like a peace deal is close. Kind of genius, bombs Iran and triggers a crisis in the region, spends a sh*t load of dollars, pushes up oil prices and screws the global economy, and looks like will end up with a deal worse than Obama's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

looks like a peace deal is close. Kind of genius, bombs Iran and triggers a crisis in the region, spends a sh*t load of dollars, pushes up oil prices and screws the global economy, and looks like will end up with a deal worse than Obama's.

will have to see like everything with trump .... it has the potential to manipulate markets and not go anywhere 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Crazyfool01 said:

whats Trump up to ? are we going to wake up to another war ? or is he going to bomb Iran again 😞 

What he’s doing to Cuba seems to be going under the radar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

Think Iran are saying no to the nuclear bit of the deal...and basically the hardliners are in control now and they're not likely to give in easily. An absolute f**kup.

But but but, the art of the deal and all that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

 

Think Iran are saying no to the nuclear bit of the deal...a

 

And so they should. There is no logical reason why certain countries can have nuclear and others can’t

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

And so they should. There is no logical reason why certain countries can have nuclear and others can’t

obviously only stable democracies should be allowed to have them...like US, Israel, Russia, China etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

Looks like Israel are destroying any chance of a peace deal, which was maybe the plan.

There’s a shock . Netanyahu has to continue his reign of terror to justify his job to the voters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Israel and Lebanon agree to a ceasefire...problem is Hezbollah, and problem with Hezbollah is Israel. Israel should withdraw, put onus solely on Hezbollah...who are already weakened, which would then strengthen credibility of the Lebanese govt. But with Netanyahu in charge that is unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, steviewevie said:

Israel and Lebanon agree to a ceasefire...problem is Hezbollah, and problem with Hezbollah is Israel. Israel should withdraw, put onus solely on Hezbollah...who are already weakened, which would then strengthen credibility of the Lebanese govt. But with Netanyahu in charge that is unlikely.

Hezbollah rejected it.

Really Israel should get the f**k out, and US and others should support the Lebanese govt in defeating Hezbollah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...