Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Almost certainly Pointless...


bamber

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

was my first thought, too.

So probably not pointless. :P 

I suspect an admin of a Glastonbury site for the last 20 years and someone who has been posting on said site for the last 10 years has more obscure knowledge than the average Pointless audience member.

If we lot were the audience, then there probably wouldn't be any pointless answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bamber said:

In really quite marked contrast...

 

Oh to be led by donkeys rather than Tories! Donkeys are lovely creatures and would do a far better job than the incumbents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Keithy said:

No. The 100 people are asked to name a Glastonbury headliner so obviously they'll go for the obvious names as they're not trying to give a pointless answer. The contestants are challenged to find an answer the 100 people didn't say....so Shakespeare's Sister is quite an obscure, old headliner....ergo, an obvious pointless answer. 

Errrrrrr... yeah. I was kind of over thinking it. We here all know that SS are the most obscure headliner so we wouldn't go for that one. We certainly aren't a representative sample. 

Still ..... Ash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fishman said:

Errrrrrr... yeah. I was kind of over thinking it. We here all know that SS are the most obscure headliner so we wouldn't go for that one. We certainly aren't a representative sample. 

Still ..... Ash.

They're not. They were on that documentary about the row with Anne Goode. Ash is a better answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, eFestivals said:

i reckon it would be much higher if it had had the opportunity. It kept going offline yesterday.

But the 'weird' thing is that on Wednesday night the numbers were going up far far quicker per-minute than they were going up yesterday at the times it was working. It looks suspiciously like some deliberate interference.

BBC article seemed to reason there was no interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...