Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

NEXT GEN CONSOLES


The Nal

Recommended Posts

It's got a dedicated graphics card, so good enough.

Bear in mind that doesn't have Windows installed.

And tbh, under £450 for a gaming PC won't get you something that will be able to play high end games long-term.

So it will play most games out at the moment but will become redundant when new games come out that are more advanced?

I assume I could upgrade a pc over time, new graphics card etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So it will play most games out at the moment but will become redundant when new games come out that are more advanced?

I assume I could upgrade a pc over time, new graphics card etc?

Anything that advertises itself as a gaming PC should be able to play most games out now. The issue is both in terms of future games and longevity of the machine.

The graphics card will be fine for a while, there's differences between them but ultimately it's a decent brand 1GB dedicated graphics card. My question given it's a prebuilt rig will be whether the motherboard can actually cope with any upgrades, as I expect the saving is made on getting a crappy motherboard that can only just cope with the stuff connected.

I wouldn't order from play anyway, I'd go to somewhere like http://www.overclockers.co.uk/ or http://www.arbico.co.uk/ and speak to them about what you can get that'll suit your needs. I found Arbico incredibly helpful when I bought my last PC, which I've used as a base and just upgrade from. They'll discuss specs on about as technical a level as you'll need, and you can always check here if you feel they're pressuring for something you're not sure you'll need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything that advertises itself as a gaming PC should be able to play most games out now. The issue is both in terms of future games and longevity of the machine.

The graphics card will be fine for a while, there's differences between them but ultimately it's a decent brand 1GB dedicated graphics card. My question given it's a prebuilt rig will be whether the motherboard can actually cope with any upgrades, as I expect the saving is made on getting a crappy motherboard that can only just cope with the stuff connected.

I wouldn't order from play anyway, I'd go to somewhere like http://www.overclockers.co.uk/ or http://www.arbico.co.uk/ and speak to them about what you can get that'll suit your needs. I found Arbico incredibly helpful when I bought my last PC, which I've used as a base and just upgrade from. They'll discuss specs on about as technical a level as you'll need, and you can always check here if you feel they're pressuring for something you're not sure you'll need.

Great stuff. Thanks for the advice :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it will play most games out at the moment but will become redundant when new games come out that are more advanced?

It probably won't even do that. PLAY say it's a super fast gaming computer. This is the overview of PC Pro on your graphics card:

Verdict

No good for gaming but it can handle Blu-ray, and it's cheap and small enough for any media PC

Review Date: 4 Feb 2010

So it's a £35 graphics card that was already underpowered for gaming three years ago.

They benchmarked against Crysis, which is a high-end game, at a medium resolution and in low detail. It got 7 frames per second. Bear in mind 30 frames per second is something of an utter minimum, and 60 frames per second should be your realistic minimum.

So yeah. Their PC might be okay for surfing and watching films, but it's not much of a gaming rig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing as the gaming rig might be a while away yet, I was thinking of trading in my 360 for a PS3. Having PS+ on my Vita seems almost like a waste, as though I'm not getting the full use of it. If I had a PS3 I could get a bunch of games from PS+ AND The Last of Us...

Edited by G-Stud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing as the gaming rig might be a while away yet, I was thinking of trading in my 360 for a PS3. Having PS+ on my Vita seems almost like a waste, as though I'm not getting the full use of it. If I had a PS3 I could get a bunch of games from PS+ AND The Last of Us...

If you're going to do it I'd try and do it by Wednesday before the July update so you can get June and July's games!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go on the Sony website and buy everything for PS3 on plus. Then they'll be waiting for you, cus I doubt your PS3 will be here today.

Yeah looks like, if I'm lucky, I might get it tomorrow... Glad I took your advice and downloaded those games today.

Edited by G-Stud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PSN apocalypse sale starts today, can be found here! With an added 10% discount for PS+ members :)

£25 for Far Cry 3 & Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon... Don't even have my PS3 yet (maybe Friday...?) but I'm so tempted by that!

Reading some more, seems like PSN has their proper big Summer sale coming soon...Might be worth waiting for that.

Edited by G-Stud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am tempted by Borderlands 2. Thanks!

Same, already have Max Payne 3 and Far Cry 3 which are also on sale. (Would reccommend anyone to get Far Cry 3 best game I've played on 360)

Borderlands look decent, but the weird cartoony graphics put me off a bit.

AC3 reviews look meh.

Edited by Jackmypie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decided to buy Borderlands 2, will give me something to play over summer.

Also anyone else annoyed at the lack of games coming out this summer? In Autumn there's a shit loads that I want to buy e.g GTA, FIFA, Battlefield 4 and maybe Cod & AC.. don't get why all the good games get released at once in Autumn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to buy Borderlands 2 last night and the price has gone up to a staggering £49.99 :O

Seriously, who pays these ridiculous prices?!

I bought Crysis for £4.50 in the end. Not played it yet though as it took about 2 hours to download.

Also, if you don't already own it, the Orange Box is now £4.50. That is an absolute bargain for 4 quality games (and a multiplayer game that no-one plays). And XCOM is £15 today as well. Best game of last year,

Edited by windy_miller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Ive seen a lot about the Wii U the past couple of days again and I just have to come in here again and say just how much Nintendo have fucked up.

I see Nintendo have spoken to investors and tried to ease the situation, but I see it getting worse not better.

Firstly they're saying they can't afford to sell the Wii U at a cheaper price.

Then Miyamoto confirms that they completely underestimated the time scale envolved in developing HD software and are only just now getting used to it

Thats what happens when you're a whole generation behind the other two, I mean, you see how PS3 and 360 games got better over time that means you're gunna be getting low end titles for a long time and Ninty usually only release one version of their franchise per generation so Smash Bros, Mario Kart etc are all gunna be below par what could be achieved, I mean I looked at Smash Bros around e3 time and it looked like it offered NOTHING the wii version doesn't do. It looked the same.

But this is the reason why Pikmin 3 is nearly a year late, and Smash Bros and Mario Kart etc aren't going to be released until AFTER PS4 and Xbox One are on the market, I mean these are Nintendos big games and the console released in 2012 and these only have a vague 2014 release date. No F Zero, Animal Crossing, Zelda, Metroid or any other big licenses look on the horizon either.

Then Itawa Nintys president just talks a load of bollocks, 3rd party developers are pessimistic about Wii U because they don't believe their software will sell, but when we release our big hitters then they will come back.

No. No they won't Itawa, 3rd party software sold very badly on wii, with a much higher installed user base than Wii U will EVER have, Ubisoft were your main supporter with exclusive licenses like Red Steel which did ok, but they tried to support Motion Plus with Red Steel 2 and the game bombed, and then they withdrew.

AND it appears history is repeating itself Ubisoft have just confirmed there will be no ZombieU 2 because the first game didn't make a profit ''Not even close''

EA have withdrew, Activision are releasing Call of Duty Ghosts but I bet its the last Call of Duty game to get released for it. Ubisoft will only end up releasing just dance games and maybe a Rayman game if they can be bothered, they already withdrew it as an exclusive and made it multiformat, the next thing the multiformat games won't include wii u.

Why does Itawa say 3rd party games didn't sell well on wii u? because they were ports and avalible on other consoles. Im sorry but thats not gunna change, NO company will make a exclusive to wii U because it won't make them money, like they say they didn't release how much time and effort and money goes into making HD games, 3rd party developers do, because they've been doing it for years on other formats, they won't put their resources into your soon to be dead product. Nintendo have no-one to blame but themselves, they treated their hardcore fanbase like shit and just re-release old titles at full price and shovelware. Poor online support, shocking shop service, treated indie software companies like shit during the wii. Now they need to rely on 3rd party and its too late.

Nail in the coffin for me, im just shocked Nintendo are admiting just how dumb they have been in regards to the wii U. But Itawa still states they have the upper hand because of remote play, sorry but PS4 every game will do this. And the software support will be MUCH greater.

When Sega died it was because they tried pushing the envelope too soon, internet play, huge developement costs on games like Shen Mue, Ninty its completely the opposite, behind the times, but one thing that killed/will kill both, lack of 3rd party, and when Activision join EA in not supporting the machine, Ninty. You're done.

I just hope they're planning beyond the wii U already. Because they need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Nintendo had to do was line up a dozen franchises, and make fucking new ones. I can't believe they still had no compelling exclusive system seller at launch. Every Nintendo console has launched with something fascinating and interesting at launch.

They are sitting on a ridiculous gold mine of IP: Metroid. Pilot wings. Mario. Zelda. Mario Kart. Excite bike. Pokemon. Wave Race. Wii Fit. Smash Brothers. Have any three of those as launch titles and that's it - it's a smash hit. Sod third party support - people buy Nintendo systems for Nintendo games.

It really wasn't hard! Even a Wii U Sports thing would have done. A shitty new Duck Hunt would have been SOMETHING.

Even a Mario Galaxy 3 would have been better than Mario World U or whatever that is. Is Mario Galaxy going to be the last proper Mario that felt like proper progression was taking place? I get the feeling it might be.

What are they doing? What the hell?

Even just re-releasing all of the Wii's best content in HD would have been enough for some extra sales.

Where's all the virtual console stuff? Why the hell can't you get all of the old Game Boy games for the screen already? They are so slooooooow with this shit it's unreal. Missed a massive trick with the emulator there - even if the Wii U was nothing more than a Nintendo museum so people could indulge in nostalgia at a decent price people would buy it for that. Every gamer on the planet would probably love a proper Nintendo museum and not have to always rely on cracked consoles running ROMs. But instead they chose a slow trickle of too few classic titles and it's hard to tell what's coming out and when. It's all too much hassle to keep track of. It should have been packaged meticulously but it seems like they're a bit arrogant and a bit scatterbrained at the moment.

Edited by Purple Monkey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the museum concept is spot on, surely there could be an official emulator that ships for free via download, and games "sensibly" priced via download and you would sell a shitload of software with no dev costs at all, you could have good online multiplayer where it suited the game. nes snes gamecube and wii games for the console, and gba and ds games for the tablet. some of the games could be sold at ios prices - 99p to £9.99 for example

but they really missed the boat at launch, i said it a few pages ago - I dont believe a game like ssbb would take that long to knock out, or even a mario kart. and 2 or 3 big name launch titles would have made a massive difference. the wii-u has surely been under development for a couple of years - dont tell me they couldnt have had devs working on those titles 2 years ago.

Edited by t8yman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Wii U and I like it. But at the moment it's used for Zelda Skyward Sword and a few virtual console games. They desperately need to show that some big Nintendo heavy hitters are coming. Promote the new Mario and Mario Kart, tell us a new Zelda's coming, bang a new Donkey Kong out!

Sadly my Wii U is waiting for Nintendo games that seem a long way away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with Ninty is they have limited resources, the team working on Wii U Mario Kart had to finish the 3DS Mario Kart first and they needed help from Retro to do it and the same goes with Smash Bros that team had to finish Kid Icarus first and are grabbing help from Namco to finish the new ones. Keep in mind 2-3 years ago the 3DS looked like a flop so they had to turn around and knock out some big hits for that as losing ground in the home console market is the norm for them now but the handheld market with they dominate would of been a serious fuck up.

I'm always tempted by a Nintendo console but as been said there's no killer games for it yet tho Zombie U looks good, if Bayonetta 2 and the new Zelda, Mario & Mario Kart games turn out to be must haves then I may get one but if not I'm happy not to get a home console. TBH the 3DS currently has everything I want in both home and handheld consoles, there's 8 very different games that coming out in the next 12 months that look like must haves along side the huge back catalogue. The only thing I wish they do is to not charge £5-7 for original Gameboy games on the eshop and to make full releases of games like Yoshis Island which they have already ported to the 3DS but gave away free to the early adopters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Wasn't just me who thought it was either oversold or inadequately setup for the event then? For Pride, over the weekend, where there's also acts in the large blue marquee that was to the right of the "arena" (for want of a better term), it's probably much better as people are dispersed more. Thought the band were great, as was Nick, though he was clearly struggling with his voice at times.
    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...