Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Peter Dow


Guest Uncle Liam

Recommended Posts

Wasn't Reagan an actor before coming president and Schwarzenegger a drug user & actor before becoming a republican?

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 865
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

I was just making the point that cretins, drunks and junkies and those with irresponsible politics - racist, neo-Nazi etc would be barred from office and not eligible to stand and the standards need to be quite strictly enforced for executive or ministerial office.

Not saying your MP can't have a drink now and then and still get on the ballot box because a member of parliament is more a representative job rather than an executive job and if the MP's voters are mostly drunks maybe a drunk is an appropriate representative?

If an MP's voters are mostly drunks maybe a drunk is an appropriate representative, but if an MP's voters are mostly racists a racist isn't an appropriate representative?

I think you're a bit muddled about what democracy is. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what a brilliant idea. Let's replace the people who know something about their jobs with people who know nothing about those jobs, that'll sort the problems out. :lol::lol:

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I said "replaced by elected persons".

Why would you elect someone who you think knows nothing about the job?

I presume you would vote for the candidate who you thought did know something about the job?

I would.

But as well voting for someone who knew something about the job, voters would vote for someone who they thought would treat them fairly and not abuse his or her power in office to treat the people like slaves or as animals.

When the problem is judges and police officers knowing something about the job and nevertheless using their power to abuse citizens, deny them their freedom when they were not doing anything wrong then that problem can be successfully addressed by allowing the voters to pick who is in charge.

votes around the world show this idea does not work. Votes around the world shows that this idea leads to greater corruption.

None of the people elected president of the USA were cretins and none as stupid as Queen Elizabeth.

PMSL :lol:

Rubbish. There are plenty of IQ tests that have nothing to do with quack psychiatry. None of the psychiatrists' drugs or ECT or brain operations will get the "patient" (victim) a higher score on an IQ test. All their so-called "treatments" impose brain damage, lower intelligence and make the victim less healthy as a result. Psychiatry is an industry of death.

The whole idea of intelligence being measurable by an IQ test is one that's been cooked up by the mind quacks. Either you approve of the mind quacks or you don't.

I didn't say "teetotal". I said "drunk". If you habitually drink to the point of impaired judgement - as in you could not legally drive - then you are not someone who can be relied on to be on call for emergency service.

yeah, cos it's important that the president is on call ready to put your house out when it's on fire. :lol:

Most presidents can manage to stay sober I would imagine. If not, impeach them.

The guy who's considered by many as the UK's best ever leader spent that leadership pissed as a fart.

What a stupid thing to write.

As a democrat, I oppose dictatorship. I support people having their say. The president's main job is to make sure that people are allowed to have their say. That's what presiding is all about. That's practically a job description.

The stupidity is yours alone - I was repeating back to you a précis of what you've said, and which fatally conflicts (yet again) with what you've said just here.

You say that everyone can have their say in your "democracy" - except racists, monarchists, and whatever groups you add to your exclusion list in the future (I'm guessing that "people who ask awkward questions on the internet" will be in the running :lol:)

I am not a cretin and no doubt I could pass many a test to prove it.

you're failing this test dismally.

Well Condi says he was a lot smarter than many took him for.

which just goes to show how thick she is herself. :lol:

Sure cretins get a vote and a say, just not the opportunity to do a lot of harm in charge.

Oh, so some are more equal than others in your 'democracy'. Nice.

Yes President George W Bush was not a cretin. Well done. You have been paying attention I see.

PMSL :lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil's right about IQ tests - even psychologists accept they only measure a range of skills - mainly the aptitude for completing IQ tests. It's dangerous to assume there's an objective test to measure a subjective and value-ridden trait like intelligence. The most you can do is measure aptitude for a particular skill set that's culturally associated with intelligence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you ever stop to think you bring this on yourself? Do those kids go and knock on other peoples houses, or by chance is it just yours? I'd wager its just yours. And that because you've got a big blaring siren that goes off, and those kids see it as an achievement that they've done it. You are the local nut job, the idiot who walks around town making a complete show of himself. Deep down, you actually enjoy the attention you get, because otherwise why would you have a sign that says "NO BANGING" (or the equivalent) and a big siren that goes off. I bet nobody else does, and I bet nobody elses doors and windows get banged. Watch that video, look at the way those kids target YOUR flat. And nobody elses. This kind of thing is your own doing. YOUR actions have led to this.

Personally, I think you are an absolute lunatic. You've got no knowledge of politics, and instead you are just a a pathetic attention seeker who will blame anyone but yourself for your own failings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Uncle Liam could have phrased himself more tactfully, I agree that the local kids might be targetting you because they know they can wind you up, and giving them an alarm to set off is a mistake.

You have to treat kids with respect,and try not to be confrontational.

Our local kids used to open my gate and let our dog loose, so i went up to them one day, and said, 'have you seen my dog? I'm really worried about her, she keeps getting out and she's too old to look after herself. Will you keep an eye out, and if you see her trying to get out, will you shut the gate for me?'

They looked shamefaced and never let her out again.

What do you think they'd have done if I'd gone in there ranting at them?

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pe

ter can I just say your photoshop skills are remarkable. That photo of the queen as the grim reaper a few pages back was truly wondrous.

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once posted a video of a london double decker bus a couple of minutes after it had driven into a low bridge. That currently has 144,000 views.

i.e. people find a bus crash is about 15 times more interesting and inspiring than you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I've just posted Condi as Pharaoh, so remark on my photoshop of "Condi as Moses" if you like.

condimoses.jpg

and this is my photoshopped vision of a 200 metre high statue we might build of Condi in Washington, showing the recently unveiled statue to Martin Luther King in the foreground.

Condoleezza Rice - the true wonder of the worldcondiwashingtonmonument.jpg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I've just posted Condi as Pharaoh, so remark on my photoshop of "Condi as Moses" if you like.

condimoses.jpg

and this is my photoshopped vision of a 200 metre high statue we might build of Condi in Washington, showing the recently unveiled statue to Martin Luther King in the foreground.

condiwashingtonmonument.jpg

Condoleezza Rice - the true wonder of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...