Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

If I were a footie manager I'm sure I'd be able to give you a list of players. But I'm not so I can't.

But as an example, Maynard at Bristol City outscored Carroll two seasons ago when Newc were in the Champs, and Maynard is still at City (tho rumoured to go this window). He's got to be worth a punt by some club, tho he's perhaps of too low standard for what Liverpool are looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The prosecution's case against 'Arry seems fairly damning. Interested to see what his lawyers come up with to counteract it. To me it looks as though he's totally screwed. Him and Mandaric's stories to the police not adding up, claiming he didn't know it had any money in it and that he wasn't in charge of the account when they have evidence he personally ordered a £100000 transfer to his Miami account.

Oh dear 'Arry. Oh dear,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

The prosecution's case against 'Arry seems fairly damning. Interested to see what his lawyers come up with to counteract it. To me it looks as though he's totally screwed. Him and Mandaric's stories to the police not adding up, claiming he didn't know it had any money in it and that he wasn't in charge of the account when they have evidence he personally ordered a £100000 transfer to his Miami account.

Oh dear 'Arry. Oh dear,

Yup, much as I've said.

From what i've just read on the Guardian website, part of 'Arry's defence is that he believed that the club had paid tax on the money. That's a defence that shouldn't work, because tax paid or not he should have still declared it as income at the time of receipt (he didn't), declared it's existence to his accountant (he didn't), and fessed it up to the tax investigators when they got on the case (he didn't).

And then about the most damning of all is, after the account has been discovered, the attempt by Mandaric to try and claim it as a loan he'd made to 'Arry. The jury would have to be right suckers to fall for that.

What gets me most about this case tho is how relatively small the sum involved is. It only makes me think that for such a highly paid manager to be doing dodgy dealings over avoiding tax on £200k then it's got to be habitual and there's a hell of a lot more that's not yet been discovered.

I really really hope that the jury don't get sucked by the glamous nature of the case. It's them that 'Arry and Mandaric have been robbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Regarding the whole 'Arry thing, does anyone else suspect his constant 'tinkering' is actually because of bungs

when a man has a contract like he did at pompey which encourages that man to sell his best players, then very definitely.

In fact, 'best players' isn't of any relevance. Buy any player, and if you can make the club a profit on that player that's money to you - and no penalty for any duds you buy.

With a contract like that it's no wonder that 'Arry's known for buying huge numbers of pointless players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

What did george graham get for bungs? Was it a ban or just fine?

a ban from football.

I don't think the same would happen with 'Arry over this court case tho if he's found guilty. GG was taking 'bungs' out of sight of his employers (theft!), while 'Arry has been taking contractal payments that are 100% above-board in all football senses.

'Arry's 'theft' (if found guilty) would be from the taxman, not from football. I don't think it's something that would lead to sanctions from the FA.

About the only way that the FA might get involved I reckon would be in deciding that 'Arry couldn't be England manager if he's convicted.

But even that would depend on the uproar around his conviction I reckon - after all, the dodgy dealings of Venables didn't exclude him from the England job.

Whatever happened to Venables? :blink: .... I've not heard anything about him for years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What gets me most about this case tho is how relatively small the sum involved is. It only makes me think that for such a highly paid manager to be doing dodgy dealings over avoiding tax on £200k then it's got to be habitual and there's a hell of a lot more that's not yet been discovered.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a ban from football.

I don't think the same would happen with 'Arry over this court case tho if he's found guilty. GG was taking 'bungs' out of sight of his employers (theft!), while 'Arry has been taking contractal payments that are 100% above-board in all football senses.

'Arry's 'theft' (if found guilty) would be from the taxman, not from football. I don't think it's something that would lead to sanctions from the FA.

About the only way that the FA might get involved I reckon would be in deciding that 'Arry couldn't be England manager if he's convicted.

But even that would depend on the uproar around his conviction I reckon - after all, the dodgy dealings of Venables didn't exclude him from the England job.

Whatever happened to Venables? :blink: .... I've not heard anything about him for years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect when / if 'Arry goes down there'll be an awful lot of managers (of lesser profile) and agents suddenly remembering bank accounts / payments they'd conveniently forgotten about.

I read ages ago, but can't recall where, that the case is as much about sending a warning to the rest of the football world in general as it is about punishing 'Arry specifically for such a relatively small amount.

See also, HMRC vs the "football creditors' rule".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:( + :)

Bummer. That's a Europa League place gone. Either Liverpool or Cardiff get one. Got to hope the FA cup finalists are between either big 6 teams or us now. That or hope to pip Arsenal to 5th.... Cracking game though.

On the plus side, Ba back and Cisse available for our next Prem game on Wednesday! Huge shock in the ACON for Senegal to be the first team knocked out, but I'm delighted we'll get strikers available again. Watching the highlights now, and while disappointing neither have scored in the tournament yet, they've played some nice touches. Great spin from Cisse to get a shot away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • UK to strip back procurement rules to focus on job creation, says Louise Haigh https://www.ft.com/content/9878a2e4-3ac5-43b0-b2c9-b1fe1a4b65e7?syn-25a6b1a6=1   Burnham is not serious about tackling climate change. Having conditions on govt contractors is one of the easiest ways to drive standards and behaviour.
    • Basement Jaxx 110 (-10) Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • What is too old for Leeds Fest now ?  I'm going to the Fontaines Saturday in a few weeks at 54 !!!  I may be the oldest there 🙂    Wythenshawe may be an option for WA.
    • Pretty much all festivals lose out on major artists because of production limitations though. Glastonbury is no different to most other festivals.  Lots of acts can/will adapt their tour production to suit festival stages if they want to play them, but some acts with stage designs and routines just don't want to adapt, and would rather just stick with a rigid, well-rehearsed production and take the money for their own gigs, whether that's a lot more than playing Glastonbury, or slightly less than playing some other festivals (but with added complications). Trying to adapt the stage, layout, access to b-stages etc to accommodate a single headliner on a Friday and then having to change it all around for a Saturday headliner isn't really a goer when most headliners can just easily adapt their show to stay on a main stage, if they're so inclined. They have a year to figure out how to perform a song on a main stage and ditch a few dance routines out on a b-stage if they really put their mind to it. It's not that difficult......
    • I would be all over Wolf Alice but may have outgrown this venue.    Also have to consider the schedule they have been on this year so may be on a break.  This last 10 days alone they did Tramlines, New York, Chicago and Kendal Calling.  Although make hay while the sun shines may come into play.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...