Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Andy Copping Talks acts for 2012


Guest luckysalt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

no windup dude,i was looking at all the years and was on the website where itshows you a list of download 07/08/09 etc and 2003 is the 1st one that actually said download festival. or am i getting ozzfest 2002 confused? was that the 1st year of it but called that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2012 is the 10th Download:

1. 2003

2. 2004

3. 2005

4. 2006

5. 2007

6. 2008

7. 2009

8. 2010

9. 2011

10.2012

Whether it's the 10th anniversary or not probably depends on your application of the English language and whether you're the type of person who thought that the new Millennium began at the start of 2000 or the start of 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2012 is the 10th Download:

1. 2003

2. 2004

3. 2005

4. 2006

5. 2007

6. 2008

7. 2009

8. 2010

9. 2011

10.2012

Whether it's the 10th anniversary or not probably depends on your application of the English language and whether you're the type of person who thought that the new Millennium began at the start of 2000 or the start of 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably because of Pendulum whoring themselves out to all the festivals and getting well received and Chase & Status seem to be going the same route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't tell you a Chase and Status song to be honest, probably heard some, but if it was on in a pub I wouldn't know it was them. But I know they are popular, I know a few people who are download goers who like them.

I think they're going down the same route as Pendulum playing many different fests and just getting bigger and bigger.

Anyway, interestingly today Andy said to me on twitter he doesn't see Paramore as main stage headliner material by next summer, at the moment yes, but next summer he thinks they will have dipped in popularity, he said to someone else maybe second stage headliners.

He's also bigging up Iron Maiden and hinted they could be headlining next year.

EDIT - forgot to say that one minute he says he doesn't want to book the acts that play Sonisphere so one year they're headlining Soni and then the next at Download, but then the next he's saying he's open to booking Rammstein and Iron Maiden, Sonisphere headliners from 2010.

Edited by luckysalt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't tell you a Chase and Status song to be honest, probably heard some, but if it was on in a pub I wouldn't know it was them. But I know they are popular, I know a few people who are download goers who like them.

I think they're going down the same route as Pendulum playing many different fests and just getting bigger and bigger.

Anyway, interestingly today Andy said to me on twitter he doesn't see Paramore as main stage headliner material by next summer, at the moment yes, but next summer he thinks they will have dipped in popularity, he said to someone else maybe second stage headliners.

He's also bigging up Iron Maiden and hinted they could be headlining next year.

EDIT - forgot to say that one minute he says he doesn't want to book the acts that play Sonisphere so one year they're headlining Soni and then the next at Download, but then the next he's saying he's open to booking Rammstein and Iron Maiden, Sonisphere headliners from 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'm right in saying that Iron Maiden were headlining Sonispheres in Europe this summer - Spain, for example? Not my thing, really, but I agree they'd probably sell a lot of tickets (and we'd probably go watch them for the crack, if there was nothing better on .... ;) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tweeted AC about the possibility of A7X headlining 2012 but he replied saying "Not in 2012, but possibly in the future"

I knew it was always unlikely as it hardly happens to play second and then headline the next year but as they're my favourite band id give it a go.

My personal prediction is... Metallica, Rammstein and Paramore to headline with Machine Head, Evanescence and Pendulum or Limp Bizkit supporting. (not many big bands who could support Paramore in similar music)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was only citing Machine Head as they were one of the handful of bands that Mr Copping listed as future mainstage headliners (that hadn't headlined before), the list IIRC was MH, Paramore, Pendulum, BFMV, A7X & ADTR (although he said ADTR were a couple of years away).

Paramore look good on paper but I'm unsure how they'd fare with the Download crowd, especially as it's a much older general demographic that at R&L? I've only ever seen Paramore the once, at Leeds last year. They were OK but for me didn't have the 'wow' factor I was expecting. I've read that the audience at their own shows is considerably younger, is this fitting with the average 'Downloader'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding QotSA and the possibility of them headlining...

People seem to keep mentioning whether they are big enough to do this - in 2005 the Friday night headliner was Feeder! If Feeder can headline surely QotSa can.

And whoever discounted them because of the lineup changes they've had over the years/lack of playing arenas - would you say NIN (if they were still going) wouldn't be good enough to headline? Because, in terms of lineups, they're kind of the same (NIN are Trent plus whoever he recruits at the time), and the only time they ever played arenas in this country was on their goodbye tour in 2009 (when they played the MEN and the O2 - before that I think the biggest venue here they headlined was Brixton Academy), however I'm sure they could have easily headlined Download before then...

Saying that I'm hoping the headliners next year will be Rammstein (they're doing their "best of" tour next year and AC has been after them for years), Tool (because they're fricking awesome!), and Pearl Jam (because they are are not only fricking awesome but could probably just about fit in to the list of bands that could be acceptable for the Sunday classic rock thing that AC seemsto like - maybe make it a bit of grungey classic rock next year and have Soundgarden as main support (Matt Cameron will just have to have a busy day :) with Alice in Chains below them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding QotSA and the possibility of them headlining...

People seem to keep mentioning whether they are big enough to do this - in 2005 the Friday night headliner was Feeder! If Feeder can headline surely QotSa can.

And whoever discounted them because of the lineup changes they've had over the years/lack of playing arenas - would you say NIN (if they were still going) wouldn't be good enough to headline? Because, in terms of lineups, they're kind of the same (NIN are Trent plus whoever he recruits at the time), and the only time they ever played arenas in this country was on their goodbye tour in 2009 (when they played the MEN and the O2 - before that I think the biggest venue here they headlined was Brixton Academy), however I'm sure they could have easily headlined Download before then...

Saying that I'm hoping the headliners next year will be Rammstein (they're doing their "best of" tour next year and AC has been after them for years), Tool (because they're fricking awesome!), and Pearl Jam (because they are are not only fricking awesome but could probably just about fit in to the list of bands that could be acceptable for the Sunday classic rock thing that AC seemsto like - maybe make it a bit of grungey classic rock next year and have Soundgarden as main support (Matt Cameron will just have to have a busy day :) with Alice in Chains below them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I asked him about the likelihood of A7X/Bullet playing again next year and he replied by asking me "Who would you like to see?"

So I told him A7X/Bullet/Nickelback, any one of those andd he came back saying "I better get busy then!"

Not sure what I'm supposed to take that to mean but hey!

And yes I know it's unlikely Bullet or Avenged will play next year as both played this year, but a girl can dream! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay then, didn't think it would be likely...

TBH i don't think Paramore should headline Download as i believe it should be a metal/heavy rock festival and leave R & L for the Alt/Punk/Indie stuff. But then MCR, Lost Prophets, Offspring, Feeder have all headlined so its looks likely.

Cost a lot but can you imagine the buzz for Metallica, Iron Maiden and Rammstein to headline???

KISS are the outside bets for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I always wanted to go to Download, because I THOUGHT it was supposed to be a metal/heavy rock festival, and when I started hearing about Paramore headlining it kinda ruined my romantic idea of what Download should be, and as next year will be my first time to Download (first festival ever actually) I think I'd be pretty disappointed if Paramore headlined. If Metallica and Remmstein headlined I think I'd cry with happiness lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be a metal/heavy rock festival. I think Green Day would be an incredible booking though IMHO.

I think Paramore should headline R&L before they get a chance at Download, less feisty crowd and be a decent chance to see how they headline.

Rammstein look to be a good bet i think... Metallica may take a break for a year or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has to be some level of diversity or range, the more you pigeonhole the festival the more you restrict both the choice of bands (leading to lots of repeats) and the potential market for ticket sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...