Who on here doesn't go to festivals?

[eFestivals]

Oh for god's sake you two. I'm not sure whether to bang your f**king heads together or make you go & sit in opposite corners of the room.

:angry:

I'm no less angry at his bollox, particularly as he's suggesting all this stuff he's accusing me of must be being hidden from you, the other users. Yet I've not bothered to hide his accusations of it (as you can clearly see), and I'd think any smart minds would realise if I've not bothered to hide the accusations then I'd have probably not hidden those things if they'd happened.

It's precisely for these reasons why I choose to have any spats like this out in the open - then hopefully people come to realise that nothing is being hidden.

But very obviously there's a limit to how much of this sort of bollocks I'll allow. He's clearly trying to damage this site by making these false accusations, and I'm not so stupid as to give him a continual platform to do that.

[ampersand]

But very obviously there's a limit to how much of this sort of bollocks I'll allow. He's clearly trying to damage this site by making these false accusations, and I'm not so stupid as to give him a continual platform to do that.

[rachbon]

i don't know who's worse. i think they both just like arguing. worm keeps coming back and neil keeps letting him come back when they both know what the outcome will be - arguments.

Edited October 14, 2010 by _rachelbon

[The Nal]

Errrr......so does Worm go to festivals then?

[rabid]

Errrr......so does Worm go to festivals then?

[eFestivals]

so why not just ban him altogether? rather than having delayed posts through moderation, and then arguements?

i don't know who's worse. i think they both just like arguing. worm keeps coming back and neil keeps letting him come back when they both know what the outcome will be - arguments.

Because if I did ban him I'd then have morons like you telling me continually how out of order I've been by banning him.

If you both mean what you say, and post back here you're happy for him to be banned, I'll ban him.

If you won't post back here to say ban him, then I'll take that as your acceptance of what his presence here causes, and you can shut the f**k up about it from here onwards.

So give me your choices.

Edited October 14, 2010 by eFestivals

[philipsteak]

i usually try and get to atleast 2 fests a year, but im going on exchange to new zealand in january till late september so its looking like im going to miss out on pretty much every festival this year which is really depressing!!

any festivals in new zealand between january and september? lol

[ampersand]

i just don't see the point in moderation. you post and you have to wait for yourself to give it the green light. when in that time there may be 4 or 5 posts made onto another page and no-one sees your post. or he may want to post from 7pm onwards when you don't tend to be on which is pointless.

so yeah, ban or nothing at all i'd say. and see as you don't want the latter, then ban.

[rachbon]

Because if I did ban him I'd then have morons like you telling me continually how out of order I've been by banning him.

If you both mean what you say, and post back here you're happy for him to be banned, I'll ban him.

If you won't post back here to say ban him, then I'll take that as your acceptance of what his presence here causes, and you can shut the f**k up about it from here onwards.

So give me your choices.

[Paul ™]

I don't think banning anyone should happen unless they are bringing the forum into disrepute or damaging the business.

Banning someone just for debating/arguing is just censorship

[eFestivals]

I don't think banning anyone should happen unless they are bringing the forum into disrepute or damaging the business.

the thing is, there is that aspect.

Banning someone just for debating/arguing is just censorship

correct, and not something I do.

[eFestivals]

it doesn't make much difference to me whether you ban him or not. i quite like his posts but i do tend to avoid threads where you two are arguing because it can get a bit boring and it moves too quickly to keep up with anyway.

you're the one who said that his false accusations can damage this site, if you really do believe that i don't know why you haven't banned him (maybe because you enjoy the arguments?)

Fine. Your last comment on the matter.

[eFestivals]

i just don't see the point in moderation. you post and you have to wait for yourself to give it the green light. when in that time there may be 4 or 5 posts made onto another page and no-one sees your post. or he may want to post from 7pm onwards when you don't tend to be on which is pointless.

so yeah, ban or nothing at all i'd say. and see as you don't want the latter, then ban.

Thanks. I'd have acted if both you and rachelbon had said the same.

[Pogues Mcgogues]

So basically this forum runs now on having two people reaching a consensus and the result will be done by the owner?

Can you make Ampersand have -1000 rep please? Anyone else want to second this and we can have this done?

[Pogues Mcgogues]

Neil, the Jobby Fish coalition has spoken!

[saratink]

I go to festivals Try to do at least one a year, but then, i feel gutted at only having done one!