Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

  • Admin

No guarantees of that though.

Budget wise, I wouldn't say it wasn't an option. The loan was the year we signed Nani, Anderson and Hargreaves and we did spend £30m the following year for Berba. Could probably have eaten into next summers transfer budget if wanted (and so no Berba), or signed Tevez over one of the other incoming players that year.

Thing is questionable what price Kia would've looked for at the time to relinquish his asset that early (perhaps Kia only made him available on loan at the time?), and unlikely that we'd sell a contracted player to City so would be looking elsewhere for someone to stump up the cash if looking to move him on. Would've been a big risk paying c.£30m for him just based on 1 season in Europe (where only really played for half of that season). The loan mitigated that.

If at his current level with City at his age when he with us then we'd probably have no problems finding a suitor, but no guarantees we'd recoup that amount if looked to move him on after his second season with us where he wasn't at his best. His form in that season didn't really justify him being a £30m forward to anyone other than City, who needed a profile signing to increase attractiveness to their project.

They'd have been a better guarantee than there was with pissing £10M up the wall, as happened.

But I wasn't suggesting that Utd couldn't afford to buy Tevez, I was saying that the option to buy simply wasn't there at that point. That option only became available after The Prem changed the rules about 3rd party ownership, which made no-money-Kia realise that selling was the only option if Tevez was staying in the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why's it ridiculous? :blink:

Eto'o scored around 35 goals last year. Know he's 30 whereas Tevez is 27, but not like going to be much long-term security with Tevez when he wants to f**k off again after 2 years.

Can't really see Barca offloading Villa either. I take the "we only have £45m" talk with a huge pinch of salt though. Unwise to come out and say we have 100 trillion dollars!!!! They'll get both Fabregas and Sanchez, which is a pretty frightening prospect for their squad depth.

Tevez is an excellent player but massive risk in terms of what kind of return you'll get for the outlay. No-one wants to pay £35m + huge wages for a player that a year down the line is going to start kicking up a fuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he may of scored around 35 goals last year, but he's two old for the premiership. we might of got one or two good seasons out of him at the most, city would need allot more than that if they were giving away one of the top strikers in the world.

going back to him scoring around 35 goals, he scored them in serie A a league that is well known for leaking goals because of poor defences. and allot of the teams he would of played against would of been the equivalent to some of our championship sides.

if he came to England aged 30 and scored over 20 goals that would surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for your point on Wenger, i'm still firmly on his side. The lack of spending has been driven by the board and not him. Yes he has been stubborn, but in the most place, he's fronted for the board when tyhe blame doesn't lye with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he may of scored around 35 goals last year, but he's two old for the premiership. we might of got one or two good seasons out of him at the most, city would need allot more than that if they were giving away one of the top strikers in the world.

going back to him scoring around 35 goals, he scored them in serie A a league that is well known for leaking goals because of poor defences. and allot of the teams he would of played against would of been the equivalent to some of our championship sides.

if he came to England aged 30 and scored over 20 goals that would surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stepping outside the top flight for a moment... it's all happening in League 2. Newly promoted Crawley town have been splashing the cash about, and have signed up just about everyone. They've got so many quality strikers it's unreal. They really are the Man City of League 2.

Having said my team (Gillingham) have been busy in the market. Announced the signing of 7 players in the last week... a couple of non-leaguer's coming up, and some quality players from other leagues coming in. For the first time in a long time I'm confident of a good season with the players we have, and can't wait for it to start. So glad I renewed my season ticket.

I swear... lower league football is where the real game is. None of these flouncy over-earning over-spending premiership players... cold wintery trips to macclesfield and morcamber are where it's at!

Edited by Halcyon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stepping outside the top flight for a moment... it's all happening in League 2. Newly promoted Crawley town have been splashing the cash about, and have signed up just about everyone. They've got so many quality strikers it's unreal. They really are the Man City of League 2.

Having said my team (Gillingham) have been busy in the market. Announced the signing of 7 players in the last week... a couple of non-leaguer's coming up, and some quality players from other leagues coming in. For the first time in a long time I'm confident of a good season with the players we have, and can't wait for it to start. So glad I renewed my season ticket.

I swear... lower league football is where the real game is. None of these flouncy over-earning over-spending premiership players... cold wintery trips to macclesfield and morcamber are where it's at!

Edited by ralph250
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Stepping outside the top flight for a moment... it's all happening in League 2. Newly promoted Crawley town have been splashing the cash about, and have signed up just about everyone. They've got so many quality strikers it's unreal. They really are the Man City of League 2.

Having said my team (Gillingham) have been busy in the market. Announced the signing of 7 players in the last week... a couple of non-leaguer's coming up, and some quality players from other leagues coming in. For the first time in a long time I'm confident of a good season with the players we have, and can't wait for it to start. So glad I renewed my season ticket.

I swear... lower league football is where the real game is. None of these flouncy over-earning over-spending premiership players... cold wintery trips to macclesfield and morcamber are where it's at!

I gotta say, I can't wait for the season to start. :)

Not entirely sure what's happened more recently, but previously for Aldershot all the old players were being signed by Wazzock at Wycombe while Deano was bringing in a rather alarming number of players from the lower leagues .... I'm hoping that he's getting them for their hunger and it doesn't mean a drop back to the conf. But he's potentially the best manager in the league, so I'm keeping my fingers firmly crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corriere dello Sport, who claim that Inter are desperate to sell Wesley Sneijder to Manchester United for £30m because they need the money to pay for Velez Sarsfield midfielder Ricky Alvarez, Santos defender Jonathan and Genoa striker Rodrigo Palacio.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Arsenal, I don't think the board are holding back nor are there are financial problems as pointed out, but there is a wage model in place in order to be self-sustaining.

Thus Wenger can't go out and splash the cash on big names when he isn't allowed to offer high wages that they would desire.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/jul/04/arsenal-cesc-fabregas-samir-nasri?CMP=twt_gu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going back to him scoring around 35 goals, he scored them in serie A a league that is well known for leaking goals because of poor defences. and allot of the teams he would of played against would of been the equivalent to some of our championship sides.

if he came to England aged 30 and scored over 20 goals that would surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Arsenal, I don't think the board are holding back nor are there are financial problems as pointed out, but there is a wage model in place in order to be self-sustaining.

Thus Wenger can't go out and splash the cash on big names when he isn't allowed to offer high wages that they would desire.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/jul/04/arsenal-cesc-fabregas-samir-nasri?CMP=twt_gu

Edited by ralph250
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Wages include all staff).

And regards Wages, discussed before but they have a pretty competitive overall wagebill, but a wage policy different to others, instead weighting high pay towards the youngsters comparative to what other clubs offer.

2009/10

Chelsea £173m

Man City £133m

Man Utd £132m

Liverpool £114m

Arsenal £111

Arsenal's interim results has them at an extra £4.5m in salary increases for the first half year, so at a guestimate £120m for 2010/11.

United's 3rd quarter results had us an increase of 8.1% (or 7.7m over the same period in 2009/10) so guestimate of around £142m ish for our "staff costs" for 2010/11, though would predict a reduction currently as would presume De Gea, Jones, and Young would be on lower wages collectively than VDS, Neville, Scholes and Hargreaves. Would guess that's around c. £250k p/w off the wagebill before the incoming players. Still to see what we do in midfield, though again Brown, O'shea and Gibson look to be off (probs c. 100-120k p/w), and possibly others.

*United's "staff costs" also include player signing on fees spread over the length of their contract. Doesn't say, but presume Arsenal do likewise. No mention I can see regards where bonuses are allocated but possibly within those staff costs too. If so, would affect United's figure more considering higher degrees of success.

As stated before though. Arsenal's policy is to pay top whack for their youngsters and from the AST presumably in high numbers. Pay well, to attract good youngsters when transfer fee is minimal, develop them then presumably sell for profit. Tough with the wage structure weighted that way, to retain the players that develop to an elite standard though. Get a player that becomes one of the top 10 in the world, and they'll look to see there's 50 players worldwide getting paid more and want remuneration commensurate with their perceived worth/ability.

Great for those that work out, but perhaps liable to significant waste aswell, if paying comparitively high wages to a number of youth that don't make it at a high enough level to resell/recoup investment in that player. And to those that do, as before, tough to shift likes of Bendtner and Denilson when they're on reportedly £50k p/w. As I put to Steve aswell, possibly breeds a "I've made it" culture (at least at that particular club), if not much upshot salary wise of improving there. Though some of opined it's a Wenger idea, in that he feels a big disparity in salary can cause fractions. Whether that's true or not I don't know, but conversely I'd guess some players could be dissatisfied if making considerably more impact than someone else yet earning the same (or close to).

What works for them though, and they may feel the benefit of getting players early for lower fees is more beneficial.

The AST has previously raised with the club the suggestion that the club should review its overall playing infrastructure to make sure that it is investing its considerable wage bill as efficiently as possible. We would also welcome more explanation of the costs of running such a large reserve and youth squad and whether this provides added value in the round.

Feb 2011

http://www.arsenaltrust.org/recent-news.php?article=341

Edited by ralph250
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for Crawley, the business model is completely unsustainable and they look like a club prone to explode anytime soon. The whole situation just doesnt make sense, why would investors not from the area suddenly decide to throw money at crawley when there are teams in the league above like bradford with far more potential. They have also got a manager found gulity of tax evasion who was involved in other dodgy activitites. Something just doesnt seem right about the club and I suspect in 5 years time they will have gone bust. However with their history the fans may take a few years of glory and a return to the lower leagues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...