Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

singles thread


Guest outtolunch

Recommended Posts

You don't want to be treated as a sex object, but you want your breasts do receive the recognition that they deserve?

Men just can't win sometimes. Mind sometimes not wining isn't a bad thing.

Out of interest - superior how? Are we talking size, proportions or pertness? What are the characteristics of a superior pair of breasts anyhow?

I'm going to come up with an essay question on the subject ; compare and contrast your own breasts with those of Beeny, and write in no less than five hundred words which you consider superior and why. Feel free to use pictures and/or video footage to explain your work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gawd, why is that when I'm away from my desk that this thread always starts to get interesting!

G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd just have liked him to recognise that just because mine were covered up, doesn't necessarily mean they aren't as good a standard. I didn't say I didn't want to be treated as a sexual object, I said I didn't ONLY want to be treated as one :lol:
Edited by sifimaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't decide..

Big breasty handfuls are of course marvelously wonderful. Grabbing a lovely big handful of boobage is one of the most wonderful things on earth. of course. They also have the added advantage of generally being able to take a darn good chewing and and are what I would describe as in general term more robust.

Then there is NOTHING cuter than a smaller pair of charlies. Flat chested girls sometimes worry about these things, yet, I find them quite adorable, they remain perty for SO much longer, and in my eperience, ladies with smaller jug-a-lugs only have to have them breathed on for her to go bezerk. Which of course is always nice.

Oh, the agony of choice.

Kat, yours being on the more ample side is fine. But as most darts players prove, bigger isn't always better.

I think, upon reflection, I just like dem titties...

...

Thanks for the mammaries, ladies...

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually the seventh here : http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/know
Edited by Goblinz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of us have one bigger than the other.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bunique> Isn't it true that a lot of men like the challenge of trying to seduce a married woman? I know a lot of women wouldn't be put off by a wedding ring............. :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be the "biblical" sense then.

I have the same dillema. Thon only problem with big nawks is that they head south easier. In an ideal world you could have one of each, then you have the choice, depending on what mood your in.

Admittedly I once "knew" a girl who was kind of like that, but she had one big one and one absolutely huge one. Twas a bit weird really.

G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love boobies....mine especially!! :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In 2024, Dua and Coldplay had B stages and they were dismantled and rebuilt overnight to suit both acts. 
    • UK to strip back procurement rules to focus on job creation, says Louise Haigh https://www.ft.com/content/9878a2e4-3ac5-43b0-b2c9-b1fe1a4b65e7?syn-25a6b1a6=1   Burnham is not serious about tackling climate change. Having conditions on govt contractors is one of the easiest ways to drive standards and behaviour.
    • Basement Jaxx 110 (-10) Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • What is too old for Leeds Fest now ?  I'm going to the Fontaines Saturday in a few weeks at 54 !!!  I may be the oldest there 🙂    Wythenshawe may be an option for WA.
    • Pretty much all festivals lose out on major artists because of production limitations though. Glastonbury is no different to most other festivals.  Lots of acts can/will adapt their tour production to suit festival stages if they want to play them, but some acts with stage designs and routines just don't want to adapt, and would rather just stick with a rigid, well-rehearsed production and take the money for their own gigs, whether that's a lot more than playing Glastonbury, or slightly less than playing some other festivals (but with added complications). Trying to adapt the stage, layout, access to b-stages etc to accommodate a single headliner on a Friday and then having to change it all around for a Saturday headliner isn't really a goer when most headliners can just easily adapt their show to stay on a main stage, if they're so inclined. They have a year to figure out how to perform a song on a main stage and ditch a few dance routines out on a b-stage if they really put their mind to it. It's not that difficult......
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...