Neil Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 13 minutes ago, steviewevie said: Wragg has resigned. Almost feel sorry for him. Was so much easier being a gay tory mp when all you had to worry about was indiscrete rent boys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 6 point narrowing.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 I blame Angela Rayner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 (edited) 4 minutes ago, steviewevie said: 6 point narrowing.. Outlier of course. Opros always overestimate the Tories vote. It will reverse next time. Edited April 9 by Ommadawn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 1 hour ago, steviewevie said: 6 point narrowing.. Savanta generally showed smaller leads for Labour, the last few polls for them showed quite Labour leads so this is probably reverting back. I would imagine it would move back slightly next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 the corbyn fan club are trying to f**k things up for labour. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/09/we-cant-tolerate-this-sunak-condemns-protest-outside-starmers-house Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 3 minutes ago, Neil said: the corbyn fan club are trying to f**k things up for labour. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/09/we-cant-tolerate-this-sunak-condemns-protest-outside-starmers-house thats the sort of ugly politics from the left in the 70s that gave thatcher her foothold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 12 hours ago, Neil said: thats the sort of ugly politics from the left in the 70s that gave thatcher her foothold. I don't know...think it was more the state of the economy and strikes and stuff that helped Thatcher. These sort of protests targeting politicians homes seems to be a more modern thing, clips for social media etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 5 minutes ago, steviewevie said: I don't know...think it was more the state of the economy and strikes and stuff that helped Thatcher. These sort of protests targeting politicians homes seems to be a more modern thing, clips for social media etc. The strikes were part of the ugly politics of the 70s. confrontations, like the attempt at a confrontation with starmer by protesting at his home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 30 minutes ago, Neil said: The strikes were part of the ugly politics of the 70s. confrontations, like the attempt at a confrontation with starmer by protesting at his home. I mean...some might argue that strikes are a legitimate and perfectly legal method used by trade unions. Whether protesting outside Starmer's home is legitimate (or legal) is another matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarkete Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 13 hours ago, Neil said: thats the sort of ugly politics from the left in the 70s that gave thatcher her foothold. gave Thatcher her foothold... So that she could demonise unions and vastly diminish the right to strike. Let's not carry on harping on like a mail front page about unions when their powers were very much curtailed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 1 hour ago, clarkete said: gave Thatcher her foothold... So that she could demonise unions and vastly diminish the right to strike. Let's not carry on harping on like a mail front page about unions when their powers were very much curtailed. im just pointing out that actions can have equal and opposite reactions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 2 hours ago, steviewevie said: I mean...some might argue that strikes are a legitimate and perfectly legal method used by trade unions. Whether protesting outside Starmer's home is legitimate (or legal) is another matter. strikes are a legitimate action, the way they were done in the 70s was often mob-rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarkete Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 28 minutes ago, Neil said: strikes are a legitimate action, the way they were done in the 70s was often mob-rule. As were some of the responses https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/18/scandal-of-orgreave-miners-strike-hillsborough-theresa-may Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 10 minutes ago, clarkete said: As were some of the responses https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/18/scandal-of-orgreave-miners-strike-hillsborough-theresa-may yep, and the public found both sides repellent which is how come thatcher was able to weaponize it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarkete Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Neil said: yep, and the public found both sides repellent which is how come thatcher was able to weaponize it. Nah, the majority of the public knew much less about violence against the unions, as in most cases it takes years for that information to get out..whereas they still push info against unions on front pages very regularly. Edited April 10 by clarkete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 it was like a civil war...and the unions lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 1 minute ago, steviewevie said: it was like a civil war...and the unions lost. true, because 'the left' are crap leaders with crap strategies, and no ability to learn better for next time. the miners strike could have gone much better if not for Scargill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 17 minutes ago, clarkete said: Nah, the majority of the public knew much less about violence against the unions, as in most cases it takes years for that information to get out..whereas they still push info against unions on front pages very regularly. because unions are still f**king with people's lives, and the people don't like to be f**ked with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 3 minutes ago, Neil said: true, because 'the left' are crap leaders with crap strategies, and no ability to learn better for next time. the miners strike could have gone much better if not for Scargill. because they took on the state led by a government which wanted an ideological battle to break the unions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarkete Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 5 minutes ago, Neil said: because unions are still f**king with people's lives, and the people don't like to be f**ked with. Yes, of course they have dear 😂 But they did get us equal pay, equal opportunities, protection from being sacked when being sick or on maternity, maternity pay, 2 day weekends, minimum wage and the living wage. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 8 minutes ago, steviewevie said: because they took on the state led by a government which wanted an ideological battle to break the unions. worse than that; scargill wouldn't allow a free vote on having a strike, but then expected the labour party to support a strike the miners hadn't voted for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 Just now, clarkete said: Yes, of course they have dear 😂 But they did get us equal pay, equal opportunities, protection from being sacked when being sick or on maternity, maternity pay, 2 day weekends, minimum wage and the living wage. yes, i was simply stating how come there's still often anti-union stuff in the papers. better strategies needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewevie Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 22 minutes ago, Neil said: worse than that; scargill wouldn't allow a free vote on having a strike, but then expected the labour party to support a strike the miners hadn't voted for. well yeah, he should have allowed a vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.