Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, charlierc said:

 

I mean, pretty much - rebuilding Burnley after their 2022 relegation and getting promoted was good work by Kompany. But that's not normally the prelude to being thrown straight in at Bayern Munich.

 

Perhaps the only parallel I can think of was Frank Lampard's first Chelsea appointment on the back of Derby County getting into the play-offs, although even then, that probably owed a lot to other circumstances such as Lampard's acclaimed stint as a player there.

what's fat frank doing now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/27/2024 at 9:49 AM, pink_triangle said:

Martin seems to be a complete idealist  in terms of style so I think the lack of pragmatism may be found out in the premiership. Interesting only 5 northern teams left which apparently lowest in the premiership era.

as a southerner, its nice to see more southern teams doing well at the moment.in the past it tended to be just soton. now there's Brighton & b'mouth too. and no sign of Pompey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, charlierc said:

 

I mean, pretty much - rebuilding Burnley after their 2022 relegation and getting promoted was good work by Kompany. But that's not normally the prelude to being thrown straight in at Bayern Munich.

 

Perhaps the only parallel I can think of was Frank Lampard's first Chelsea appointment on the back of Derby County getting into the play-offs, although even then, that probably owed a lot to other circumstances such as Lampard's acclaimed stint as a player there.

There's been a few successes of ex players doing well. Most notably daglish, pep, souness and zidane, even di matteo won the champions league. It's nothing new, even going back to wilf mcguinness. But they all had strong links to previous clubs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Neil said:

as a southerner, its nice to see more southern teams doing well at the moment.in the past it tended to be just soton. now there's Brighton & b'mouth too. and no sign of Pompey.

I mean, the Premier League has barely any northerners for next season. Just the two Manchester clubs, two Merseysiders and Newcastle, with nothing from Lancashire and Yorkshire. Will be a very lop-sided look next year.

 

And indeed for Newcastle fans, a lot of time spent on trains and buses to go to any away game. But then that seems to be the case more often than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, thetime said:

There's been a few successes of ex players doing well. Most notably daglish, pep, souness and zidane, even di matteo won the champions league. It's nothing new, even going back to wilf mcguinness. But they all had strong links to previous clubs. 

Sure. I know not every situation is one where a great manager is a failed or frustrated player, as were Wenger, Mourinho, Klopp, etc.

 

But it is also a point that usually if a big club is chucking in an ex-player, it tends to be the actual club's greats, as we had even with why Lampard got the leg-up into Chelsea. 

 

Certainly it will be intriguing next season to see if Bayern Munich haven't just bet the farm on a weird hunch. And indeed how Kompany adapts to working for FC Hollywood with all their behind-the-scenes politicking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, charlierc said:

Sure. I know not every situation is one where a great manager is a failed or frustrated player, as were Wenger, Mourinho, Klopp, etc.

 

But it is also a point that usually if a big club is chucking in an ex-player, it tends to be the actual club's greats, as we had even with why Lampard got the leg-up into Chelsea. 

wasn't he roman's favourite?

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, charlierc said:

Sure. I know not every situation is one where a great manager is a failed or frustrated player, as were Wenger, Mourinho, Klopp, etc.

 

But it is also a point that usually if a big club is chucking in an ex-player, it tends to be the actual club's greats, as we had even with why Lampard got the leg-up into Chelsea. 

 

Certainly it will be intriguing next season to see if Bayern Munich haven't just bet the farm on a weird hunch. And indeed how Kompany adapts to working for FC Hollywood with all their behind-the-scenes politicking.

 

To be fair to Chelsea they give English managers a chance, not many of the top sides do. 

 

Utd not appointed one since 1981.

Arsenal not had one since the mid 80s.

Liverpool only a couple since joe Fagans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Neil said:

wasn't he roman's favourite?

I think that was part of the reason why, yes.

 

Tbf in his first season, finishing 4th in the Premier League despite a transfer embargo was not a bad way to go about it. Everything after however... yeesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were so many Real Madrid fans on the Strand in London yesterday ahead of their trip up to Wembley. Can only assume that they are rather delighted with how things panned out with winning title 15 of a competition their chairman wants to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2024 at 9:40 AM, charlierc said:

There were so many Real Madrid fans on the Strand in London yesterday ahead of their trip up to Wembley. Can only assume that they are rather delighted with how things panned out with winning title 15 of a competition their chairman wants to replace.

Imagine winning the champions league on the saturday, your fifteenth in total, and then signing one of the best players in the world on a free a couple of days later. 

FFS, spoilt bastards need a bit of down to make all this upside a bit more appreciated! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, balti-pie said:

Imagine winning the champions league on the saturday, your fifteenth in total, and then signing one of the best players in the world on a free a couple of days later. 

FFS, spoilt bastards need a bit of down to make all this upside a bit more appreciated! 

They've won more champions leagues in the last 10 years than league titles. 

 

Which is a bit crazy. Although perhaps not so crazy. When you think Spain and England have had a stranglehold on the champions league in the last 14 years, only Bayern breaking that. 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thetime said:

They've won more champions leagues in the last 10 years than league titles. 

 

Which is a bit crazy. Although perhaps not so crazy. When you think Spain and England have had a stranglehold on the champions league in the last 14 years, only Bayern breaking that. 

Also seems to demonstrate that Barcelona aren't all that far behind Real after all despite their financial self-sabotage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, balti-pie said:

Imagine winning the champions league on the saturday, your fifteenth in total, and then signing one of the best players in the world on a free a couple of days later. 

FFS, spoilt bastards need a bit of down to make all this upside a bit more appreciated! 

They just don't do things by halves, clearly.

 

Vinicius Jr is a fantastic player and they're lucky to still have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, balti-pie said:

Imagine winning the champions league on the saturday, your fifteenth in total, and then signing one of the best players in the world on a free a couple of days later. 

FFS, spoilt bastards need a bit of down to make all this upside a bit more appreciated! 

And yup, Mbappe to Real Madrid confirmed.

 

Reportedly taking a pay-cut on his weekly PSG wage, albeit boosted by the fact they're paying a gargantuan golden hello.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thetime said:

Was wondering what this was about given it was broken by The Times, but behind a paywall so unable to read the actual content.

 

Given this was a rule brought in thanks to complaints about the potential for the Saudi PiF to plough money into Newcastle, I can see why the similarly funded Man City would complain. But given a majority of PL clubs voted for it, I'm not sure what they can exactly do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just found out that historically, arsenal played a part in enriching Richard tice ( the guy who was leader of the reform party until a few days ago).

 

maybe without arsenal we would have never left the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thetime said:

Newcastle then.

Screenshot_20240605_192656_X.thumb.jpg.e666b3530dfc7a0ff39b379b17499a6e.jpg

I can see it. The related party sponsorship rules that Man City are protesting was brought in just after the Saudi takeover. Though so far, the reports are that we're more passive than the Sky Blues in going hell for leather with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I can see it. The related party sponsorship rules that Man City are protesting was brought in just after the Saudi takeover. Though so far, the reports are that we're more passive than the Sky Blues in going hell for leather with this.

who'd have thought that the despots would support each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I can see it. The related party sponsorship rules that Man City are protesting was brought in just after the Saudi takeover. Though so far, the reports are that we're more passive than the Sky Blues in going hell for leather with this.

Newcastle would do well to distance themselves from city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

Newcastle would do well to distance themselves from city. 

not going to happen, newc's owners took their lead from city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...