Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, thetime said:

De Zerbi leaving Brighton. 

 

 

Depending on who you believe, he's either joining Bayern Munich or already turned them down. Though that may say more about Bayern, given they've been turned down by their first 7 or 8 choices to succeed Thomas Tuchel. And that includes Tuchel himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

Depending on who you believe, he's either joining Bayern Munich or already turned them down. Though that may say more about Bayern, given they've been turned down by their first 7 or 8 choices to succeed Thomas Tuchel. And that includes Tuchel himself.

dunno how much he's a part of Brighton's success, but I've been impressed with how Brighton are building on their prem league position (rather than fading away again, like most promoted clubs do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Neil said:

dunno how much he's a part of Brighton's success, but I've been impressed with how Brighton are building on their prem league position (rather than fading away again, like most promoted clubs do).

Perhaps that's the reason he is leaving. 6th last season and could be down to 13th at end of play today. 

 

Difficult for any side like Brighton to consistently get top 6 or 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

Perhaps that's the reason he is leaving. 6th last season and could be down to 13th at end of play today. 

 

Difficult for any side like Brighton to consistently get top 6 or 7.

Everything set to succeed. historical debt shaken off. shiny new stadium. stable ownership. improving the players who go Through the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thetime said:

Perhaps that's the reason he is leaving. 6th last season and could be down to 13th at end of play today. 

 

Difficult for any side like Brighton to consistently get top 6 or 7.

Came P11 in the end. Though from what I could tell as an outsider, they just seemed to run out of players after an injury crisis and they seemed to be something of a funk after getting knocked out of the Europa League. One win in their last 10 kinda hinted that they'd come off the rails.

 

Even then, I actually thought he'd stick around. But those in the know hint there was discontent at transfer policy in January and I suspect the fact he seemed to be touting himself for other jobs probably rankled a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7th place for Newcastle then after beating Brentford in spite of ourselves. I'm ok with that tbf - thought we'd finish about there in pre-season. Even if we have to wait for the FA Cup final next week to see if Man City get us that coveted Europa Conference League place.

 

Bit of an odd season really. I genuinely think our high-end moments were good enough to get 4th again, given we beat Villa home & away plus home wins over Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea and Man Utd, but equally, the injury crisis, our awful away form and failing to win home or away against Luton, Bournemouth and Everton and losing at home to Forest all went a bit of a way to explain why we weren't good enough for more. Ho hum.

 

I'd say roll on next season but first, roll on having to schlep to Melbourne for two post-season friendlies that I truly don't understand the merit of beyond the payday.

 

Oh and Man City won the league after 90 seconds. Good for them I guess.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, charlierc said:

Came P11 in the end. Though from what I could tell as an outsider, they just seemed to run out of players after an injury crisis and they seemed to be something of a funk after getting knocked out of the Europa League. One win in their last 10 kinda hinted that they'd come off the rails.

 

Even then, I actually thought he'd stick around. But those in the know hint there was discontent at transfer policy in January and I suspect the fact he seemed to be touting himself for other jobs probably rankled a bit.

I think they need to be careful, selling all the time and not reinvesting is going to bite. Last 4 season there net spend is in the region of minus £150 million. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, charlierc said:

7th place for Newcastle then after beating Brentford in spite of ourselves. I'm ok with that tbf - thought we'd finish about there in pre-season. Even if we have to wait for the FA Cup final next week to see if Man City get us that coveted Europa Conference League place.

 

Bit of an odd season really. I genuinely think our high-end moments were good enough to get 4th again, given we beat Villa home & away plus home wins over Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea and Man Utd, but equally, the injury crisis, our awful away form and failing to win home or away against Luton, Bournemouth and Everton and losing at home to Forest all went a bit of a way to explain why we weren't good enough for more. Ho hum.

 

I'd say roll on next season but first, roll on having to schlep to Melbourne for two post-season friendlies that I truly don't understand the merit of beyond the payday.

 

Oh and Man City won the league after 90 seconds. Good for them I guess.

 

It's quite the same as last season. 

 

Last season united and Newcastle got into top 4 because of the failure of Liverpool and chelsea. This year Liverpool and Villa got top 4, due to the failure of utd and chelsea. 

 

And City win the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, thetime said:

I think they need to be careful, selling all the time and not reinvesting is going to bite. Last 4 season there net spend is in the region of minus £150 million. 

Well we saw that with Southampton years ago, who made a virtue for a while of being able to challenge high while banking big fees for their player pool, but ended up slipping down the PL rankings year upon year until last season, they stunk up the joint and finished last. Ironically doing so in a season where they did spend a lot of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, thetime said:

 

It's quite the same as last season. 

 

Last season united and Newcastle got into top 4 because of the failure of Liverpool and chelsea. This year Liverpool and Villa got top 4, due to the failure of utd and chelsea. 

 

And City win the league. 

Chelsea have been a surprise imo, if only because they spent the first 50-60% of the season looking nailed on for midtable yet have ended up in 6th thanks to a decent late charge.

 

Back-to-back top 7 finishes for Villa & Newcastle is still something though. Yes, others have had their failures in the last two seasons, but you have to be in the right place at the right time to take advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bye-bye klopp i'll always remember that goal from the corner against barca in that tie where Liverpool needed a big result. 🙂

 

he gave us some beautiful football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Neil said:

bye-bye klopp i'll always remember that goal from the corner against barca in that tie where Liverpool needed a big result. 🙂

 

he gave us some beautiful football. 

 

And a load of postiive football and vibes tbf.

 

But this golden period of domination thing is a bit mad.

 

1 league, 1 FA Cup and 2 pisspots in 9 seasons. Finished 8th, 4th, 4th, 2nd, 1st, 3rd, 2nd, 5th, 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, The Nal said:

 

And a load of postiive football and vibes tbf.

 

But this golden period of domination thing is a bit mad.

 

1 league, 1 FA Cup and 2 pisspots in 9 seasons. Finished 8th, 4th, 4th, 2nd, 1st, 3rd, 2nd, 5th, 3rd.

you're missing out a champions league

 

also he inherited a bit of a mess, here is the team from his first game in charge:

 

image.png.6815263af096a77b3764e6965c3d9e72.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

you're missing out a champions league

 

also he inherited a bit of a mess, here is the team from his first game in charge:

 

image.png.6815263af096a77b3764e6965c3d9e72.png

 

 

He did great things dont get me wrong. But seeing words like "domination" and "conquering" is a bit much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

you're missing out a champions league

and several other euro finals; he didn't win those, but you have to be in it to win it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Neil said:

and several other euro finals; he didn't win those, but you have to be in it to win it.

Yeah he finished runners up a few times in Europe and to pep in the Premier League. If there was a dominance trophy for finishing 2nd, klopp is your man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Nal said:

 

And a load of postiive football and vibes tbf.

 

But this golden period of domination thing is a bit mad.

 

1 league, 1 FA Cup and 2 pisspots in 9 seasons. Finished 8th, 4th, 4th, 2nd, 1st, 3rd, 2nd, 5th, 3rd.

 

1 league title *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, thetime said:

 

1 league title *

a beautiful game, poetry in motion, something not achieved by pep or fergie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, The Nal said:

 

He did great things dont get me wrong. But seeing words like "domination" and "conquering" is a bit much. 

Yeah the only team that has dominated english football for the last decade is City, but Klopp did amazing up against that and his tenure was impressive. A golden period for Liverpool I guess, compared to what came before just before it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

Yeah the only team that has dominated english football for the last decade is City, but Klopp did amazing up against that and his tenure was impressive. A golden period for Liverpool I guess, compared to what came before just before it.

 

Well they nearly won the league in 2014. And went close in 2009.

 

Anyway nowhere as consistent obviously as under Klopp. now the worry is a Dutch manager taking over......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

Yeah the only team that has dominated english football for the last decade is City, but Klopp did amazing up against that and his tenure was impressive. A golden period for Liverpool I guess, compared to what came before just before it.

 

Not of this romantic nonsense for wenger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Nal said:

 

Well they nearly won the league in 2014. And went close in 2009.

 

Anyway nowhere as consistent obviously as under Klopp. now the worry is a Dutch manager taking over......

Yeah I know (well actually I forgot about 09 lol) and they won the champions league too in 05 or whatever. But yeah Klopp still won a good amount and also made them a force again who can attract big names- he leaves them in a better place than he took over by far.

 

1 hour ago, thetime said:

 

Not of this romantic nonsense for wenger. 

Wenger at arsenal was totally different. He stayed too long and left a team on the decline from amazing successes. He overstayed his welcome and was clearly passed his best. Klopp on the other hand leaves Liverpool in good nick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

 

 

Wenger at arsenal was totally different. He stayed too long and left a team on the decline from amazing successes. He overstayed his welcome and was clearly passed his best. Klopp on the other hand leaves Liverpool in good nick.

Time will tell, but last 2 league finishes were 5th and 3rd with a league cup won.

 

The 2 main players will be 32 and 33 come start of the season. 

 

Hardly good nick. 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...