Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

They’ll actually process the claims for a start and either migrants will be allowed in or returned. They won’t waste the money on the Rwanda scheme which will only deport about 100 anyway. 

returning is often difficult cos they hide where they come from and some countries demand absolute proof to accept  a return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

They’ll actually process the claims for a start and either migrants will be allowed in or returned. They won’t waste the money on the Rwanda scheme which will only deport about 100 anyway. 

currently most are allowed in after processing, labour won't be popular with the anti-immigrant types if continuing with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neil said:

currently most are allowed in after processing, labour won't be popular with the anti-immigrant types if continuing with that.

I mean it is disputable if Rwanda thingy would have much of an impact anyway, if just sending hundreds over. Maybe it will deter some, don't know. This needs an international resolution, in end might need european countries taking a quota, maybe Starmer will work more closely with France/EU in finding a resolution. If could do that so that those whose asylum is accepted here get safe passage and at same time work with other countries to try and stop the boat gangs, then this could make issue less visible here. Sunak took a big risk with that stop the boats thing, if he'd said he'd reduce by a 3rd per year he'd be onto a winner, but I guess he wanted to keep Braverman and co happy.

With legal migration it is forecast to come down to about net 300/400k anyway, but will always be too high for some. In end need to make a choice, fewer immigrants and we will probably have to be like Japan and work longer and have less growth, or have more migrants working here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

I mean it is disputable if Rwanda thingy would have much of an impact anyway, if just sending hundreds over. Maybe it will deter some, don't know. This needs an international resolution, in end might need european countries taking a quota, maybe Starmer will work more closely with France/EU in finding a resolution. If could do that so that those whose asylum is accepted here get safe passage and at same time work with other countries to try and stop the boat gangs, then this could make issue less visible here. Sunak took a big risk with that stop the boats thing, if he'd said he'd reduce by a 3rd per year he'd be onto a winner, but I guess he wanted to keep Braverman and co happy.

With legal migration it is forecast to come down to about net 300/400k anyway, but will always be too high for some. In end need to make a choice, fewer immigrants and we will probably have to be like Japan and work longer and have less growth, or have more migrants working here.

Its not really about the numbers more about doing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Neil said:

Its not really about the numbers more about doing something.

Labour have a plan to do something about it, it certainly can’t be worse than the Tories whose plan is essentially do nothing and bring in gimmick plans that won’t work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

Both him and Sturgeon behaved awfully during Covid and played political games with peoples lives.  The Welsh people I know will be very much glad to see the back of him.  And the 20mph speed limit thing is ridiculous as well.

i think drakeford was the best of a bad bunch during covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

All my Welsh friends thought he was awesome.

etc.

He seems like a really nice guy from the TV. He also worked in his shed during the pandemic so he could try to avoid is wife getting covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I’ve said it elsewhere too but Emily Eavis said a 2028 headliner was booked, to me that’s only going to be someone the size of Oasis or Taylor Swift
    • Christ didn't even see that! 
    • It does feel very bland. It would certainly spell another year (my third, I think) away from Pyramid headliners for me. That doesn't mean they aren't worthy, though. I don't follow what any of them are up to, as it isn't my thing. Good luck to them.   You would think coming off a fallow year, they would want one big hitter. 'Big hitter' is obviously open to debate, but that was/is Madonna. Let's have it right. The eggs have gone in that basket, and it seems (as far the rumours go) that it's blown up. So now you're left with another plan B/replacement headliner.   I'm still of the opinion that Oasis will do it, before the Oasis thing is all said and done. Probably 2028, if they can come to an agreement. It may transpire that 2027 is bland (or at least to some of us), and 2028 is a bit... wild.   Again, though, none of us categorically know ANY of the headliners, as it stands.
    • Second go.....    Still f**king fantastic - Well done WIlliam Orbit -  Bugman & Trimm Trabb mega tracks - No Distance Left To Run hauntingly Beautiful  
    • Just realised it was 13 he produced not this one DOH!!!!   
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...