Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

A reasonable newspaper article


Sawdusty surfer

Recommended Posts

Nobody would tolerate being thoroughly searched, corralled, having non-dangerous possessions such as sandwiches confiscated etc. at a normal gig, or most other events. Why should we accept it at festivals?

Not been to many gigs/events then have they? Almost routine!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody would tolerate being thoroughly searched, corralled, having non-dangerous possessions such as sandwiches confiscated etc. at a normal gig, or most other events. Why should we accept it at festivals?

Not been to many gigs/events then have they? Almost routine!

Dont know what youre talking about, I always take some ham sandwiches to gigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"With over one million different IP addresses attempting to access an ailing website"

Er, no. There are over a million people registered, that's a totally different thing to a million people trying to get tickets.

Isn't that 3 million registered? So could well be 1 Mill trying for tickets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Yes, Id definitely pay another tenner on the ticket price"

It must be nice to have a disposable income where trifling tenners can be thrown around like confetti.

I think his point is that a tenner off the ticket price because it's subsidized by a big beer sponsor would be a false economy as taking your own drink would save a lot more that a tenner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to pick an argument with you Sawdusty but I do get a bit hacked off by people making trite remarks like 'most media items are generally a bit rubbish'.

As someone who had a 30 year plus career in journalism, I'd say most media articles are pretty good. The main difference between newspapers is not so much the actual content of stories as the ones they choose to publish.

We are incredibly lucky in Britain to have a choice of around a dozen national newspapers to choose from. In most countries papers are largely regional and at best you'll have a choice of one or two.

Journalists don't set out to mis-report and mislead the public. They do their best against constraints of time, ever more demanding deadlines - particularly since the advent of 'rolling news' - to give as honest and accurate an account of what has happened based on the available information.

I could make similarly sweeping generalisations about other occupations - most carpenters/builders/accountants/nurses/doctors etc are rubbish. But I'm charitable enough to think that most people attempt to do a decent job.

Sorry - end of rant.

And, yes, it was an interesting article and thanks for drawing our attention to it.

Like so much of life, to make sense of things you follow the money. A lot of festivals are in hoc to their sponsors, who are often brewery groups. If I was running a brewery and contributing a lot to a festival financially, I'd want the best return and would expect to see my booze mainly being on sale.

Glastonbury is very lucky that it has reached the critical mass where I doesn't have to go cap in hand to the beer makers.

Maybe festivals need to look to other ways of meeting costs or other sponsors to cut the reliance on the booze boys.

Edited by grumpyhack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • You cant see everything unfortunately, it would be Halsey there for me 100%, the last 20/25 of Gorillaz. Halsey would be my non negotiable act on that day myself. Oddly Bleech 9:3 would actually give me an option I wouldn't mind between 3:15pm and Halsey. Dogstar would only likely be a 10 minutes thing of I've seen Keanu lol.
    • I think the tent was just right for Feeder, on that day anyway.   If you had a Biffy-esque day again, or someone of that ilk (maybe Pearl Jam for example), whack them on that main stage. 100%.    As it is, I think feeder will be back and probably high up the second stage or main stage next year or 2028. 
    • I think we still have 2 acts to announce each day, maybe one more big name to complete the lineup?   Perhaps the big name is Turnstile on Thursday, which isn't sold out yet. And some other names that could be added like Iceage, Band of Horses or Tomora.
    • Saw David Gray 8 times between 2000 and 2025 (including one solo acoustic performance in Wexford, IE, 2017) and he always delivered. I enjoyed every show, never felt bland or let down an iota. To each their own. Yeah, it’s just that he’s not your cup of tea I’m afraid.   Agree that David is a bad dancer though lol.
    • Its massively bonkers the cost now amd it means missing out on some gigs but buying into only promotes it. Im more annoyed at gigs that are cheap that I have to resist as I'm far too tired after work.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...