Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Peter Dow


Guest Uncle Liam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 865
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I put it to my friend the other day that bearing in mind the popularity of the royals at the moment, and the unpopularity of politicians, that if there was a referendum on whether to 'repatriate' power back to the Royal family, specifically to William and Kate, that the result might be closer than people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's corny but rings true to a worrying extent when you think of the line ' there's only one person ever enter parliament with honest intentions and that was Guy Fawkes'. I can't abide politicians of any description though, so maybe the loathing is not as universal as I'd like to believe.

I've been listening to some economic forecasts from big players across the pond. If they are right then we haven't even scrapped the barrel of total meltdown. If that happens I don't think any royalty will be sitting that happy knowing their position is safe. I do hope they are wrong for everyone's sake. Sorry to sound doom and glummy it's just that these people kind of have their finger on the pulse. Then again they could be forcing a further down turn in order to benefit from it. Who knows what's going on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sun: Body only yards from Royal Christmas shoot

A WOMAN found murdered on the Queen's Sandringham estate lay yards from where the Royals held their Christmas shoot, it emerged yesterday.

Cops say the young female had been there between one and four months — meaning the hunting party would have unwittingly stood close to her.

The Queen and Prince Philip, still at Sandringham, have asked to be kept updated on the inquiry — as forensic officers combed parts of the 20,000-acre grounds near King's Lynn, Norfolk, yesterday.

Police are awaiting a post-mortem but ruled out a gun or knife attack

A spokesman said: "There is no evidence of accidental injury or damage due to firearms or a bladed weapon."

A dog-walker found the remains in private woods crossed by public paths at 4pm on New Year's Day.

It is close to where the Queen breeds racehorses and yards from a copse where Philip, 90, usually holds festive pheasant shoots — although he missed this year's because of his heart scare.

One local said: "He loves shooting in the field because it's a brilliant spot to bag birds.

"It's incredible to think the Royals were just yards from where this poor woman was lying dead."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My profile video has now reached 10,000 views on YouTube.So to celebrate this milestone, I have produced a new music video as follows.

Scots Wha Hae viewed Peter Dow's profile video

The video used is extracts from my profile video named "Scottish republican socialist Peter Dow, author and protester" and "The Right To Freedom of Assembly" directed by David Graham Scott.

10,000 + views! :boast:

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just watched Peter Dow's 'Scots Wha Hae viewed Peter Dow's profile video' and found it quite interesting. I've not read huge potions of this thread so what follows may be laughable - basically on the strength of the video I found him to be less doolaly than I had anticipated and actually admire the fact that he has the courage of his convictions (even if they are considered skewed by most here).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have 350,000 views of me dancing in my kitchen, i think shall celebrate with 350 music videos of me dancing in my kitchen?

imagine if you used the amount of time and passion you have into sometime beneficial like youth projects for the 25% of Scottish children who live under the poverty line instead of whinging about the queen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Voltaire once said " "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". I think the same applies with Peter Dow. Although he would probably disagree, he's emblematic of a degree of free speech in this country which others can only dream of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello kaosmark2

I did say that I hadn't read much of the thread and nor am I going to (it looks a bit too dull for me). What I was referring to was his right to spout out that he objects to BNP and even wants their free speech taken away. I was not saying that I would defend what he says or even act upon it as a reasoned way of thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Cameron trading with Saudi sponsors of terrorism

BBC: David Cameron in talks with Saudi king

_57874542_jex_1288880_de28-1.jpg

David Cameron has visited Saudi Arabia, for the first time as prime minister.

He met King Abdullah and Crown Prince Nayef in Riyadh for talks which No 10 hopes will "broaden and deepen" the UK-Saudi relationship.

One of the main aims of the trip was to establish a personal relationship between the PM and the Saudi king.

Saudi Arabia is the UK's largest trading partner in the Middle East with annual trade worth £15bn a year. It has £62bn invested in the UK economy.

Mr Cameron is travelling without UK reporters - which is unusual on a foreign trip - but Foreign Secretary William Hague insisted the visit was "not furtive".

Arms sales

Both the UK and Saudi Arabia are hoping to forge a new strategic partnership in energy, business and security.

A Saudi official told the BBC the leaders would discuss sales of the latest technology and weaponry, and making Britain a major part of a massive Saudi military expansion.

On Thursday, MPs on the committee on arms export controls published questions it had submitted to the government about British arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

The committee asked why, when there was unrest in the country in 2011, licences for a range of equipment had not been revoked.

"Why does the UK believe that the assurances relating to end-use will not be breached?," the committee asked.

Speaking to the BBC, Labour MP Katy Clark, a member of the committee, said Saudi Arabia had an "appalling human rights record" which the prime minister could not ignore.

"I think we need to ask some serious questions of David Cameron about what he is doing in our name in Saudi Arabia," she said.

"Is he raising issues about individual abuses of human rights or is he promoting the sale of arms? And if it's arms, what kind of arms and what are they going to be used for?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Cameron trading with Saudi sponsors of terrorism

I would say maximum publicity is appropriate for Cameron's backstabbing of British soldiers by dealing with those who sponsor the Taliban terrorist enemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John McDonnell wrong. Police ARE to blame for weak economy

BBC: Unions criticise Ed Balls's pay freeze comments

I don't have an exact quote of what he said but the Labour MP John McDonnell was speaking on BBC News today in response to what Ed Balls was saying about he could not guarantee to reverse cuts in pay when and if he was Chancellor in a UK Labour government or something.

John McDonnell was complaining that ordinary people who were not responsible were being asked to pay a price for an economic failure they did not cause.

I agreed with some of what John McDonnell was saying but when he was listing innocent ordinary workers he included in his list of innocents "the police"! :P

Sorry but the police are never innocent and they have to take a share of the blame for economic failure in my opinion.

I think John McDonnell is wrong to list the police as somehow innocent in terms of economic failure of the country, whether that country be Britain or Scotland.

I would say the police must take a large share of the blame because as the enforcers for the state they maintain the status quo, the mismanagement of the key economic institutions, such as universities.

So for example, if one of the Queen's stupid judges orders a talented scientist banned from a university or gagged from criticising a university (and such an order is highly likely to damage the economy) the police are the ones who are standing by to enforce that ban by locking up any person who defies a judge's court order.

So the police by assisting the judge to destroy academic freedom and civil liberties are assisting the judge to mismanage the economy are so the police as well as the judges are very much to blame.

The police and the courts are the major cause of a weaker Scottish and British economy than we otherwise could have.

I think paying the current police and judges who are allowed by the head of the state, the Queen, to do just about anything, no matter how foolish, no matter how much that wrecks the economy, paying them at all, for all the damage they do to people's lives and to the economy, is foolish. They should not be paid at all. They should be paying us back for all the damage they have cost.

We need huge change of the police and the courts which only a republican revolution and a good elected president could bring about before we could have police and courts that should be paid anything at all.

John McDonnell doesn't seem to have any idea how to strengthen the overall economy. He seems content with a weak economy and he just wants all workers, those doing a good job and those doing a bad job, paid more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the police must take a large share of the blame because as the enforcers for the state they maintain the status quo, the mismanagement of the key economic institutions, such as universities.

So for example, if one of the Queen's stupid judges orders a talented scientist banned from a university or gagged from criticising a university (and such an order is highly likely to damage the economy) the police are the ones who are standing by to enforce that ban by locking up any person who defies a judge's court order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satirical take on the desperate efforts of United Kingdom supporters proposing an devolution-maximum or devolution-plus alternative to the SNP's preferred option for a Scottish parliament approved referendum of the people of Scotland in support of an independent Queen's state of Scotland.

Either way the referendum will be rigged to keep the Queen and deny real Scottish national independence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...