Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

One of the biggest games for a few years in the Champions League tonight.

Ill go for Barca. Just. Think Milan could cause them all sorts of problems though. Nesta, Ibra and Robinho need to be playing their very very best for Milan to have a chance.

not sure if I'll watch it, but I watched last week's and I watched both of Arsenal's games against Milan.

I can't see tonight as anything but a comfortable win for Barca on the basis of those three matches (tho of course on the day anything can happen). Milan are not good enough to hold off Barca twice unless they get lucky and only half of the Barca team turn up.

I'm not saying it'll be a big scoreline, but Barca should win quite comfortably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

  • Admin

They've already held them off twice this season and only just lost in the final match of the group stages, when both had already qualified.

yeah, I know. And I thought they were very good last week, tho clearly weaker than Barca. Playing a team with Barca's style seemed to suit them much better than against trying-to-be-barca-but-falling-hugely-short Arsenal too.

But, as I say, they're clearly weaker than Barca. Anything can happen in any individual match so I don't exclude the possibility of a Milan win, but I still say it should be a comfortable Barca win.

Watch it. Should be a cracker!

my only option for watching tonight will be a poor stream online somewhere (the better quality streams keep freezing, which makes them much worse overall), so I'm not sure if I'll bother ....

Plus I think there's a strong chance that Milan will revert to Italian style and try and bore Barca to death. It's probably the best gameplan they could have. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

If you type in the two team names and "stream" in the twitter search you can almost always get a good one. I know Efests has a twitter so just do a search Neil.

finding a stream is no problem. Finding a quality stream is no problem. Finding a quality stream that doesn't keep freezing on me always is.

I've given up trying to find decent ones. It's less frustrating watching a poor quality stream than it is to chase a non-existent good one. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one hope chelsea go out, no time for the club and iniesta knocking them out is one of my favourite champions league memories. I hope for real v Barca final as I think its good to have the best 2 teams in Europe in the showcase final. Probably if you looked through the tournament history it hasn't happened that often. Definitely hasn't been case last 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one hope chelsea go out, no time for the club and iniesta knocking them out is one of my favourite champions league memories. I hope for real v Barca final as I think its good to have the best 2 teams in Europe in the showcase final. Probably if you looked through the tournament history it hasn't happened that often. Definitely hasn't been case last 2 years.

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never agreed with the argument that the team who wins the champions league is the best in europe. What's even sillier is when people claim that a side was the 2nd best in Europe because they lost in the final. As the draw is random after last 16, its completely luck of the draw who plays the eventual winners in what order.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Purely subjectively. If there was a european superleague who would be the top 2 teams. I think there is pretty common consensus its Madrid and Barcelona at present. I don't think anyone believed Liverpool, porto and inter were the best team in europe just because they won the cup.

I have never agreed with the argument that the team who wins the champions league is the best in europe. What's even sillier is when people claim that a side was the 2nd best in Europe because they lost in the final. As the draw is random after last 16, its completely luck of the draw who plays the eventual winners in what order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't. It's that simple because a cup competition doesn't order people and everyone plays in different leagues. But I don't really see the need to define every team in a set order of who's the best anyway. Who the best side is subjective and always will be. All that matters is who wins the trophy. That's what football is about, winning. I'm sure Inter couldn't Barcelona were 'the best' team in Europe in 2009, and nor should they. I certainly didn't care that Traore got a CL medal instead of his vastly superior opposite number Maldini in 2005 :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yeah, I think it's important to differentiate between a stage that's just a platform for the artist to walk on (which can be assembled fairly quickly and without too much difficulty), and the custom staging that you get in big productions where there's a whole world underneath.   Using the Eras tour as an example the stage extending out into the stadium field has all sorts - lifts that go up or down - down most importantly as this allows performers to enter or to leave the stage as needed. There's passageways to get from one part of the stage to another. There's what are effectively dressing rooms set aside for costume changes. There's spare instruments (and techs to look after them) so if something goes wrong above they can be swapped out in the space of seconds. There's even a track and dolly system running the full length of the stage so that Taylor can be moved from one end to the other faster than she'd be able to walk.   I don't know the specifics of the Madonna tour to the same degree but my understanding is that a lot of the same techniques are used.
    • Wow just got myself some Megadeth tickets and not sure I can afford another set of tickets for another gig so soon but we'll see. Fingers crossed
    • Can't speak for Dua Lipa's, but Coldplay's was vastly scaled down compared to their stadium production staging though, and tracks were adapted to reflect that. MOTS tour had a full walkway 30m out to the B-Stage in the middle of the crowd, and two C-Stages. Glastonbury didn't accommodate that at all and just had a very small walkway in front of the Pyramid stage, and (IIRC) a disconnected B-Stage.   Which re-enforces my point. Acts can adapt their stage shows if they really want. Most do, some don't want to. Glastonbury might miss out on the odd act that doesn't want to slightly adapt, but so will most festivals.   
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...