Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

As above, can't see it being last ever :P and reports of them not being stunning live any more, Its more than likely I would, just to say I've seen but i do think is that a good enough reason? I guess for me it would depend on how they are in the run up to glasto!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

Seriously though, presume if this is all true it'll be well out before October.

i'm not entirely sure about that.

If the stones work things in their normal way, it'll be the case that they won't 100% confirm to Glasto that they're playing or not until late December / early January.

I'm pretty sure that the stones have been pencilled in by Glasto as one of their headliners at least once in recent years but it came to nothing because the band pulled back on plans to tour. It's certainly the case that for the last two festivals the fest has had to change their headliner plans quite late on (tho for last year it seems pretty clear that the 'lost' headliner was Prince rather than the Stones).

If that's really happened then it's been successfully kept under wraps before and the same might happen this time too - it's not like the rumour hasn't been going around in other years as well. But this time, I guess, more people are more likely to think there's something to it because of the 50 years things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Is this your own info or you think it's likely?

I have no solid info about the stones for next year, or for previous years. They're notoriously difficult for anyone to get good info about, and while some stuff does slip out it's generally the case that it's only after an official announcement that anyone is sure that someone was talking the truth of things.

But .... there are things I've been told over recent years which has me believing that Glastonbury has been trying hard to get them. If they are ever going to get them then it's looking like it's next year or never.

From the Stones side of things, Glasto is probably the perfect way to bow out (even if it's not quite their very final show), because it will be a fantastic way to promote their back catalogue - there probably isn't anything else which would do that as well as Glasto would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could they not just have Englebert Humperdink, Gareth Gates and Black Lace headlining? I'm not too fussed about seeing huge acts play and it would make tickets alot easier to aquire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm not entirely sure about that.

If the stones work things in their normal way, it'll be the case that they won't 100% confirm to Glasto that they're playing or not until late December / early January.

I'm pretty sure that the stones have been pencilled in by Glasto as one of their headliners at least once in recent years but it came to nothing because the band pulled back on plans to tour. It's certainly the case that for the last two festivals the fest has had to change their headliner plans quite late on (tho for last year it seems pretty clear that the 'lost' headliner was Prince rather than the Stones).

If that's really happened then it's been successfully kept under wraps before and the same might happen this time too - it's not like the rumour hasn't been going around in other years as well. But this time, I guess, more people are more likely to think there's something to it because of the 50 years things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they've denied it. On twitter and on the guardian site they've said both the stones camp and Glasto camp have denied it...

...which can only mean its true and they didn't want it to be released so early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Did ME not say he already had his 2013 headliners booked? If that's true I reckon it points to Radiohead being one of the nights.

he has, but he's also said something since which pretty much proves he doesn't have them (all?) booked after all - which is pretty standard going to Michael. :lol:

Radiohead would defo be within the possibilities, but I also think it's a bit obvious - so perhaps not what will happen in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • yet in Brazil they spent the money to give her the staging so her show could be done just like in the arena. And Madonna does not compromise on that sort of thing. So money was def secondary if they got into the last phase of finalizing the booking and it fell apart when it came to production. Which is t that far fetched with her anyway.   When she did the Super Bowl, just a couple days beforehand she had the idea of wanting to rappel down from the top of the stadium to start the performance and they had to tell her there was no way it could be pulled off cause nobody makes a change like that so last minute. 
    • :  Laughs in American again :    its $200 usd here for standing. Not even counting the $500 premium seats they sold yesterday.  Upper levels are $100 usd for the cheapest on average.
    • It's funny that Burnham says all this stupid corbynite or blue labour or blairite or whatever sh*t but still everyone wants him because he's a proper northern lad who wears t-shirts and there's no way can have Streeting because he's apparently a massive transphobic zionist in the payroll of private health companies and palantir even if he is maybe actually offering what many liberal lefties would prefer but he can't be trusted, I mean..look at him.
    • Burnham has hinted he supports compensation for waspi women...err...so that's nice.....
    • Chelsea, 10 years of cheating, dodgy agent payments, breaking financial rules, etc: £10m deferred fine, no points reduction   Everton, 1 year of narrowly breaking financial rules: £40m payment, due immediately, having already been docked 10 points (reduced on appeal).
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...