Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

"we're all in this together"


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

I watched a local programme the other week (or was it national??).

Anyway.. this f**kin tribe from up here... right bad eggs the family were... terrorised the street they lived in--nickin lead from the roofs (inc their own) ASBOs the lot.

Anyway, as much as they were reported by loads of punters for benefit fraud.. nothing could be found.

So, a huge operation was launched... 24hrs surveilannce,full team of officers trawling through years and years of benefit claims--the lot--eggs beans and chips.

The woman was eventually caught on the grounds of claiming child benefit for her sisters kids.. who lived in South Africa for 12yrs!!!

A total of 93k

She was caught red handed at the Post Office where CCTV had been set up to catch her.

She was jailed --- 2 yrs she got I think.

The but to it is this... it cost £500 000 to catch her.

Now, of course--the principal is wholly correct isn`t it.. but the maths aren`t.

I`m not 100% sure what I feel about it.

When it started and you heard what she`d been doing--- yer blood started to boil... but at the end... I started to wonder if it was worth it.

Did it send a message? Was it a deterrent?

No is my feeling.

The local paper does carry a report of every benefit fraudster who is caught.... but I`m not sure it stops anybody doing it.

den

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 633
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I watched a local programme the other week (or was it national??).

Anyway.. this f**kin tribe from up here... right bad eggs the family were... terrorised the street they lived in--nickin lead from the roofs (inc their own) ASBOs the lot.

Anyway, as much as they were reported by loads of punters for benefit fraud.. nothing could be found.

So, a huge operation was launched... 24hrs surveilannce,full team of officers trawling through years and years of benefit claims--the lot--eggs beans and chips.

The woman was eventually caught on the grounds of claiming child benefit for her sisters kids.. who lived in South Africa for 12yrs!!!

A total of 93k

She was caught red handed at the Post Office where CCTV had been set up to catch her.

She was jailed --- 2 yrs she got I think.

The but to it is this... it cost £500 000 to catch her.

Now, of course--the principal is wholly correct isn`t it.. but the maths aren`t.

I`m not 100% sure what I feel about it.

When it started and you heard what she`d been doing--- yer blood started to boil... but at the end... I started to wonder if it was worth it.

Did it send a message? Was it a deterrent?

No is my feeling.

The local paper does carry a report of every benefit fraudster who is caught.... but I`m not sure it stops anybody doing it.

den

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many people in the 40% tax band file a tax return and pay 40% on the interest on their savings / current account? I've always filed one but from what I gather a lot of people on PAYE don't and its not something which seems to be chased??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many people in the 40% tax band file a tax return and pay 40% on the interest on their savings / current account? I've always filed one but from what I gather a lot of people on PAYE don't and its not something which seems to be chased??

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are alot of higher rate tax payers on PAYE that don't realize that they should be paying 40% on their savings and I maybe out of touch here but the IR when I switched from contracting to permie they told me I didn't have to file a return anymore?? as I said its not something I think they chase probably for the same reasons that it would cost more than they'd get back in taxes?? just thinking out load..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problem is yes the cost to deal with them costs a lot-but if we just leave it, well more and more would commit benefit fraud..and to a greater levels

but 2 years for 93k is a joke

they wont be forced to pay it back, squandered it all no doubt-and we cant take their house..as when she's out in 2 years the council will simply rehouse her in a new house at our cost?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I`m not sure how long she should have got tbh. She didnt kill anybody...and people get less for that eh.

They have removed the family from the house...but as you say, they have been rehomed somewhere else.

She does have to pay it back...£5 a week from her benefits she will get on release!!!! :O

Yes, The Journal is great for stabbins and killins and people with one leg who`ve climbed Killimanjaro and of course Benefit Fraudsters!

Crime... I remember going applin when I was a kid... me heart was pounding as we climbed the fence and into the orchard in JamPot Wood... up the tree and stuffin apples into me jumper. Then I head the dreaded cry... "The blokes comin! Gerrout! The blokes comin!!!"

In the blink of an eye, he was there as i got down from the tree.. and I felt his dogs teeth sink into me leg....

Point is... I didnt think for one second about what i was doing before I climbed the fence... it was only when I got caught that I began to think... Oh shit!

(of course, being the charming lad i was/am...I talked me way out of it by telling hime i was put up to it by the bigger lads...and gave him false names and addresses ;) )

Look...me. I`m on £50 a week... could i be "blamed" if for whatever reason... another £20 started getting paid to me for whatever reason.

Takes a very high-moralled perrson to say "Err excuse me... I know I cant afford more than 2 bars on the fire for 15minutes a day... but you are paying me more money than I think I`m entitled"

I think its quite different if you deliberately go and claim stuff like that woman did.

I think a lot of the "fraud" they talk about is like I`ve mentioned before... people who are pulling the wool re their health..y`know the sort... claiming incapacity benefits and then off golfing and dancing etc etc.

I agree. And y`know why... cos people hate it when they see their neighbours getting away with stuff. Esp if they dont like em.

Where I`m from--- yer dont grass...simple as that. It would have to be something "proper" for me to grass... I would never grass on somebody who i knew who was doing fiddle for instance.

I might be wrong... but thats how i am.

What would you do if you seen somebody swiping from Tescos? Would you grass?

I wouldn`t.

I`ve been in a position (once--a long time ago).. where I went stealing food to feed the family. I dont mind admitting it. Felt i had nowhere else to turn.. so I went into the supermarket and swiped some stuff so we could eat... and I`d do it tommorow if I had to.

I`d excuse anyone theiving so that they could eat.

Swiping and Xbox is a completely different matter though...

den

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a figure either earlier this year or end of last about the value of a tax inspector - they brought in x amount (I think it might have been 4 times) more than the cost of their operation. I'll see if I can find a link, but when making efficiency cuts, it was the kind of maths only a politician could come up with to justify getting rid of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I`m not sure how long she should have got tbh. She didnt kill anybody...and people get less for that eh.

They have removed the family from the house...but as you say, they have been rehomed somewhere else.

She does have to pay it back...£5 a week from her benefits she will get on release!!!! :O

Yes, The Journal is great for stabbins and killins and people with one leg who`ve climbed Killimanjaro and of course Benefit Fraudsters!

Crime... I remember going applin when I was a kid... me heart was pounding as we climbed the fence and into the orchard in JamPot Wood... up the tree and stuffin apples into me jumper. Then I head the dreaded cry... "The blokes comin! Gerrout! The blokes comin!!!"

In the blink of an eye, he was there as i got down from the tree.. and I felt his dogs teeth sink into me leg....

Point is... I didnt think for one second about what i was doing before I climbed the fence... it was only when I got caught that I began to think... Oh shit!

(of course, being the charming lad i was/am...I talked me way out of it by telling hime i was put up to it by the bigger lads...and gave him false names and addresses ;) )

Look...me. I`m on £50 a week... could i be "blamed" if for whatever reason... another £20 started getting paid to me for whatever reason.

Takes a very high-moralled perrson to say "Err excuse me... I know I cant afford more than 2 bars on the fire for 15minutes a day... but you are paying me more money than I think I`m entitled"

I think its quite different if you deliberately go and claim stuff like that woman did.

I think a lot of the "fraud" they talk about is like I`ve mentioned before... people who are pulling the wool re their health..y`know the sort... claiming incapacity benefits and then off golfing and dancing etc etc.

I agree. And y`know why... cos people hate it when they see their neighbours getting away with stuff. Esp if they dont like em.

Where I`m from--- yer dont grass...simple as that. It would have to be something "proper" for me to grass... I would never grass on somebody who i knew who was doing fiddle for instance.

I might be wrong... but thats how i am.

What would you do if you seen somebody swiping from Tescos? Would you grass?

I wouldn`t.

I`ve been in a position (once--a long time ago).. where I went stealing food to feed the family. I dont mind admitting it. Felt i had nowhere else to turn.. so I went into the supermarket and swiped some stuff so we could eat... and I`d do it tommorow if I had to.

I`d excuse anyone theiving so that they could eat.

Swiping and Xbox is a completely different matter though...

den

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I'm not saying it's OK, whjat I'm saying is that benefit fraudsters are stigmatised in a way that tax evaders are not. And tax evaders cost us a hell of a lot more, yet nobody seems to get anywhere near as riled up about tax fiddlers as they do about dole fiddlers.

Also, the PCS reckon the tax gap is being seriously underestimated, and stands at around £100 billion.

Yet rather than put a bit of effort in to collect that money (it's known that the average cost of getting it is just a sixth of the money it costs to get it!), the govt let Vodaphone off £6Bn in tax the courts had ruled they were legally obliged to pay, and then cuts every service they possibly can.

As I keep saying, the level of cuts we're getting is naff all to do with the deficit, and everything to do with ideology.

The bullshit that the Libs keep spouting to justify their policy u-turns of "the country is bankrupt" is utter bollox. If we cut nothing at all our borrowings would still be more managable over an economic cycle than some other major countries have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I saw a figure either earlier this year or end of last about the value of a tax inspector - they brought in x amount (I think it might have been 4 times) more than the cost of their operation. I'll see if I can find a link, but when making efficiency cuts, it was the kind of maths only a politician could come up with to justify getting rid of them

it's six times, not four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I always wonder how they come up with these numbers...

If they know the f**king numbers surely they know who is taking the piss... So f**king do them! :rolleyes:

Vodaphone gets to show that they have no interest in going for legally recognised tax evaders, only an interest in making the deepest cuts possible.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Probably it costs a lot more money to pay the IR to crack down on tax.

it very definitely doesn't - going after tax evaders brings in 6 times the amount of money than it costs to go after them.

This has been pointed out to Brown for years, after he made drastic cuts to the numbers of inspectors - who has then has spent the following years wondering why tax revenues have fallen off a cliff.

It's f**king insane. I can only conclude that was some sort of deal between Brown and the city, that if he gave them freedom from tax inspections they'd not pull the rug from under nu-Labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...