Football 2010-2011

[eFestivals]

no less than berbatovs? yet you still give excuses. a dive is a dive is a dive. why try to say, well it didn't change the outcome of the game. that's irelevant. walcott dived to try and change the outcome. bottom line. he's no better than berbatov. but seen as it's cuddly theo, you try to make it seem less severe.

your blinkers are the biggest on this site. at least admit it. nothing wrong with blinkers, it's the denial that's the problem.

Care to point out where I've said that what Walcott did is less of a dive than what berba did? So I've said 'a dive is a dive is a dive'.

I stated the fact that it didn't change the outcome of the game. Because it didn't. And I stated that only only because someone said "where's your sympathy for Leeds?" - pointing that out as there was no need for any sympathy for them.

So - just for a change - the whole basis of everything you're saying is utter bollocks.

[The Nal]

Care to point out where I've said that what Walcott did is less of a dive than what berba did? So I've said 'a dive is a dive is a dive'.

I stated the fact that it didn't change the outcome of the game. Because it didn't. And I stated that only only because someone said "where's your sympathy for Leeds?" - pointing that out as there was no need for any sympathy for them.

So - just for a change - the whole basis of everything you're saying is utter bollocks.

Edited January 11, 2011 by The Nal

[ampersand]

Care to point out where I've said that what Walcott did is less of a dive than what berba did? So I've said 'a dive is a dive is a dive'.

I stated the fact that it didn't change the outcome of the game. Because it didn't. And I stated that only only because someone said "where's your sympathy for Leeds?" - pointing that out as there was no need for any sympathy for them.

So - just for a change - the whole basis of everything you're saying is utter bollocks.

[The Nal]

Anyway, see Blackburn didn’t get Ronaldinho?! What a surprise!!

Hes f**ked off back to Brazil where theres cheap booze and women. Poor f**ker must be broke at this stage with all the boozing and partying hes been doing.

[TheGayTent]

And as a Nottingham man I can honestly say I'm glad.

[TheGayTent]

The North East is a hot bed of football.

Sunderland 1 2 Notts County

Att: 17,582

[eFestivals]

Didn’t you quote me (out of context too) saying “it doesn’t matter anyway” as it didn’t effect the outcome of the game on that occasion, and using that as an accusation of me saying Utd diving was ok (which isn’t true), and now you’ve gone and done the same thing with Walcott? Its ok now because it didnt effect the result now its not Utd or a Utd fan is it? f**ks sake!

No, nothing like you're fantasing.

[eFestivals]

slate walcott like you did berbatov! or is that not possible for you?

say he's a diver and leave it there. you always have to give a reason or an excuse for arsenal. but it's always an attack or a smart arse comment when it's a man utd player doing it. despite both being the exact same.

I've heard that Walcott said he dived, but I've not heard what moment he was referring to. It can't be the moment he won the penalty tho, as he was defo dragged back and he stayed on his feet.

That was no more right. I'm not the one trying to use it as any justification for wrongdoing by others.

[ampersand]

wow, 2 paragraphs out of the 30 odd you've written on it. that proves me wrong!

Edited January 11, 2011 by ampersand

[eFestivals]

wow, 2 paragraphs out of the 30 odd you've written on it. that proves me wrong!

I said the exact thing that you'd claimed I hadn't.

The proves you wrong on every basis.

Get over it.

[ampersand]

I said the exact thing that you'd claimed I hadn't.

The proves you wrong on every basis.

Get over it.

[eFestivals]

if you hadn't given reasons why it wasn't as bad before and/or after that, then yes. it would have proven me wrong.

Which part of "That was no more right" are you failing to grasp?

At no point have I said it wasn't as bad, or implied such a thing. But go on, use your super-special skill at calling me out 5to prove your take right, by quoting in it's full context me saying what you're claiming.

f**k me, you're a single-celled twat.

[Benj]

If Walcott state's that he's not that type of player (to dive), yet he's still dived, does that suggest that Arsenal are sent out to cheat by their manager?

Hmmmm, other evidence would also suggest that this may be so but oh no, it can't be, it can only be Utd who do this, despite having far less fouls given against them each year

[ampersand]

Which part of "That was no more right" are you failing to grasp?

At no point have I said it wasn't as bad, or implied such a thing. But go on, use your super-special skill at calling me out 5to prove your take right, by quoting in it's full context me saying what you're claiming.

f**k me, you're a single-celled twat.

[eFestivals]

so you didn't give 2 lines to explain the reasoning behing walcotts dive? i think you did. so you're just contradicting yourself. you say it's as bad but you just can't leave it there. you have to make it seem less severe as if 'it didn't change the outcome of the game' or 'he was honest about it', makes it any better. the bottom line is that walcott and berbatov both dived to try and decieve the ref. it ends there for me. and most others. but not neil, cos arsenal can't possibly be seen in the same light as man utd.

How many times do I need to say it? I only said "it didn't change the outcome of the game" in response to someone asking where my sympathy for Leeds was for the dive: as Walcott's dive changed nothing about the game for Leeds, there is nothing for them to have any sympathy about - Walcott's dive changed zero about that game.

(Note for Nal: Valencia's dive DID change last season's Utd/LFC game).

And it's true, Walcott WAS honest about diving. That changes nothing about how wrong the dive was, but it makes him less of an arse on a personal basis because he's not pretending it was something it wasn't, berba styleeeee.

My opinion on the dives themselves - by berba, or Walcott - is 100% equal. They were equally as bad and as wrong as each other.

You just can't help yourself, can you? Making it up out of nothing but your fantasies again and again and again. You really are pathetic.

[llcoolphil]

If Walcott state's that he's not that type of player (to dive), yet he's still dived, does that suggest that Arsenal are sent out to cheat by their manager?

Hmmmm, other evidence would also suggest that this may be so but oh no, it can't be, it can only be Utd who do this, despite having far less fouls given against them each year

[ampersand]

they aren't just my fantasies. they're the fantasies of all of us on here.

[eFestivals]

they aren't just my fantasies. they're the fantasies of all of us on here.

you might like to believe that everyone else here is as thick as you, but very luckily for the world they're not.

[worm]

Hmmmm, other evidence would also suggest that this may be so but oh no, it can't be, it can only be Utd who do this, despite having far less fouls given against them each year

[worm]

The North East is a hot bed of football.

[TheGayTent]

Yes.

[beLIEveR]

I know all clubs have people who pick and choose their games, particularly cup games. I'd say we're fairly middle of the road: 9 or 10,000 against the likes of Hartlepool and Sc**thorpe in the FA Cup, reckon we'll get 11,000 against Brighton, and it was 17,000 last time we hosted Chelsea.

But no-one does fickle like Luton. 2,029 for their first home match in the Paint Pot. Six months later they were seething with rage and calling for people to be burnt at the stake because they were "only" given an allocation of 40,000 tickets. They then go on to spend the next two years whining about the fact that Crawley and Stevenage didn't have supporters until they started winning things

[ampersand]

you might like to believe that everyone else here is as thick as you, but very luckily for the world they're not.

[eFestivals]

this doesn't state that berbatov (man utd) was worse than walcott (arsenal) in any shape or form? course not!

if you were capable of reading rather than only looking at the pictures you'd know that it's not.

yes you've said neither are acceptable but you hint that one is less acceptable than the others.

No, I state that it's something different to habitual diving. Because it is.

but no doubt that is my mind reading skills and not something that you blatantly hinted at.

to have mind reading skills you'd first need to have a mind and not emptiness.

[ampersand]

habitual diving from berbatov and opertunist diving from walcott. yes i get that, hence my point. you'll get it if i keep saying it in different ways. seen as i can't be arsed though, i'll leave you beliving that you're impartial and judge man utd and arsenal on an equal basis.