Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Jackson Browne


Guest judyblue110

Recommended Posts

but not headline?

strange, but great news if true, stevie and ray on the same day.

good times!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I presumed that if Ray Davies was playing the Acoustic he'd be headliner. But I don't know for sure that he's even playing the Acoustic, only that he's playing on the Sunday.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

from what I've been told it doesn't sound like he'll be there either (tho in a less certain way than I am about the Pyramid).

From what I was told it seems most likely that he's playing the Acoustic Tent, but I can't be sure that's right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
its very wierd. i dont doubt you at all that he's playing.

but if he's not on the pyramid/jazz then in my mind, there isnt a slot big enough for him anywhere else where he isnt headling.

I pretty much agree with that - but of course how correct that turns out being is dependent on what other acts there are on other stages at the same time that he plays.

Because......

if the other rumours are true there will be big splits in the crowd sunday

... this is PRECISELY how they try to do things - the very point of the bookings around the various stages is to ensure that the crowd IS split. They can't risk pretty much everyone all trying to be at the same stage at the same time, for the obvious safety issues it would cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes sense I suppose.

Well I hope the Orbital/Stevie clash is enough for them then so Ray isn't on last whatever stage he's playing at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw him on the main stage at Glstonbury in '82 and he was very well received. Part of his set was shown on tv - even better that year was Randy California (out of Spirit young 'uns) playing at his psychedelic best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously Danbailey80 misread your post, but i would like to hear you expand on why u think what you state, since you normally espouse wise suggestions.

are you saying that they're perfectly suited for the acoustic tent as they (ray and jackson) wouldn't necessarily draw a massive crowd just by themselves at an open air stage? or are u saying that the acoustic tent won't be rammed down the hill if these two were back--to-back on sunday night? if it's the first one i agree with you, but not the second. i think the idea of Ray Davies in the penultimate slot on pyramid (as somone suggested on here i think ... if the stellas haven't hit me already) is far-fetched...

i just thought (or hoped) that if ME is really a massive fan of Jackson browne, and if he hasn't played since '82, that he'd put him in a slot where he'd get to see him (like he did with Fogerty) which i guess he could do if he intends on missing Stevie Wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, pretty much I agree with you. I'm saying that they're not big enough for late Pyramid slots really, I'd say that they're probably the sorts of acts who would draw a big crowd at a tent (say the acoustic), and create a great atmosphere, but I don't really see them as anything larger than mid afternoon Pyramid acts. Personally, i think, particularly with Jackson Brown, it needs an more intimate atmosphere, and he'd just get lost in the Pyramid field, whereas he good be devastatingly good on a smaller stage.

I think we're all guilty of thinking our favourite acts will be more popular than they really are, especially at Glastonbury when a) there's loads going on and :P quite a few people just park themselves in front of the Pyramid all day, regardless of who's on (especially on the Sunday). If you put Ray Davies and Jackson Browne in the acoustic tent, yes, you'll get a lot of people, but not a *ridiculous* number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, pretty much I agree with you. I'm saying that they're not big enough for late Pyramid slots really, I'd say that they're probably the sorts of acts who would draw a big crowd at a tent (say the acoustic), and create a great atmosphere, but I don't really see them as anything larger than mid afternoon Pyramid acts. Personally, i think, particularly with Jackson Brown, it needs an more intimate atmosphere, and he'd just get lost in the Pyramid field, whereas he good be devastatingly good on a smaller stage.

I think we're all guilty of thinking our favourite acts will be more popular than they really are, especially at Glastonbury when a) there's loads going on and :P quite a few people just park themselves in front of the Pyramid all day, regardless of who's on (especially on the Sunday). If you put Ray Davies and Jackson Browne in the acoustic tent, yes, you'll get a lot of people, but not a *ridiculous* number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

From the eFestivals article, Michael Eavis said:

"Jackson Browne is a real hero of mine from all those Eagles songs he wrote. Jackson wrote all the best ones of his songs I reckon. "

Did he really say that? Can't say I have a huge amount of respect for Eavis if he did.

1) He didn't write that many with The Eagles. He co-wrote 3 or 4, and only wrote 1 on his own I think.

2) The reason Jackson is his hero is because of The Eagles?! Whaddadick! Jackson Browne > The Eagles in every respect.

3) The last sentence makes no sense... Of course he wrote the best ones of his songs... because... HE wrote them....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the eFestivals article, Michael Eavis said:

"Jackson Browne is a real hero of mine from all those Eagles songs he wrote. Jackson wrote all the best ones of his songs I reckon. "

Did he really say that? Can't say I have a huge amount of respect for Eavis if he did.

1) He didn't write that many with The Eagles. He co-wrote 3 or 4, and only wrote 1 on his own I think.

2) The reason Jackson is his hero is because of The Eagles?! Whaddadick! Jackson Browne > The Eagles in every respect.

3) The last sentence makes no sense... Of course he wrote the best ones of his songs... because... HE wrote them....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...