Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

world cup


Guest Kill

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 794
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I actuly think they might scrape throu the group. It's the quarters when their arse implodes. Always good to watch.

I actualy don't mind the players, always good entertainment when I see them. It's the media that does my head in. Thou I can understand the papers building them up, it sells papers. The tv builds them up, it gets viewers. Still no need to get confident thou, they average around tenth in these competitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actuly think they might scrape throu the group. It's the quarters when their arse implodes. Always good to watch.

I actualy don't mind the players, always good entertainment when I see them. It's the media that does my head in. Thou I can understand the papers building them up, it sells papers. The tv builds them up, it gets viewers. Still no need to get confident thou, they average around tenth in these competitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I've been pondering this. If GF/ME says "no. we're not going to show it', how many people, in all honesty would go to the car parks, drive away and go an find somewhere to watch it? Yesterday i said 40,000 but I've been thinking about it, and I reckon it would be much lower than that. Yes people would watch it if it were on, but if they had to trawl back to their car and then try to find somewhere to watch it, I think most people would just think 'f**k it, we're here now'. So I'm going to revise my estimate downwards to about 10,000 people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I've been pondering this. If GF/ME says "no. we're not going to show it', how many people, in all honesty would go to the car parks, drive away and go an find somewhere to watch it? Yesterday i said 40,000 but I've been thinking about it, and I reckon it would be much lower than that. Yes people would watch it if it were on, but if they had to trawl back to their car and then try to find somewhere to watch it, I think most people would just think 'f**k it, we're here now'. So I'm going to revise my estimate downwards to about 10,000 people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just got in guys and read up to about page 21, sorry if this has already been said but the answer is simple.

So we've established the match is going to be on either sunday or saturday

one of these slots will be taken up with the football and the other will need to be filled by a band.

Lets pick Kasabian, for example. If we end up playing on the sunday then Kasabian will play in the slot before the headliner on saturday. If we end up playing on the satrday then kasabian will still play in the slot below the headliner on sunday but all the other acts will have to get shifted down one.

To get round the extra time bit ME could explain his situation to the council and ask for an extension on the cufew. I think the council would go for this as they would prefer the football to be shown so they don't get loads of people leaving the site.

I hope this makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I've been pondering this. If GF/ME says "no. we're not going to show it', how many people, in all honesty would go to the car parks, drive away and go an find somewhere to watch it? Yesterday i said 40,000 but I've been thinking about it, and I reckon it would be much lower than that. Yes people would watch it if it were on, but if they had to trawl back to their car and then try to find somewhere to watch it, I think most people would just think 'f**k it, we're here now'. So I'm going to revise my estimate downwards to about 10,000 people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read all of this so apologies if I repeat anyone.

They will have to show both matches, otherwise the chaos would be ridiculous - and Eavis doesn't like messing with the locals at the best of times let alone letting thousands of people have a mass exodus.

The Wednesday the match will be the only thing on so it will have to be on Pyramid, anywhere else would be too much crush, which Eavis doens't want. So they'll have to set up the screens a day early on the pyramid, I'm sure this can be arranged.

Eavis should assume England will get though their group, any other assumption is ridicuolous. He basically needs a band who are happy and flexible enough to be support for The Stones, or play Sunday Afternoon. My guess would be Manic Street Preachers or Kaiser Chiefs.

The Stones would be unlikely to be affetced by the match, and I personally can't think of many things better than watching England beat Australia or Germany and then watch the Stones.

This is what I'd do if I was young Mr. Eavis, but it his call - I hold no power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is , you can't plan this in advance; World cups have thrown up suprises in the past and the same will happen next time; If England lose a game in group they could be second place therefore

disruption at start of day? Perhaps they should open two fields to show game whatever time it gets called..

old cinema space and williams field (with more stewarding to keep through traffic away?)

Anyhow, England are synonumous with disappointments... England v Germany? Defo will go to penalties then... And then Beckham fluffs his kick when he notices a stray hair..

Anyway whats more important a special anniversary version of glasto that won't happen again for em, another forty years,, or another 4 years of hurt....

I know which one my moneys on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Madonna lived in the UK for absolutely ages and I think is still largely London-based at the moment.  I'm sure she'll be well aware.     But it wouldn't need to be either / or.  Lots of acts do both  - Glastonbury for the hype and BST for the pay.  
    • There is a chance that Norton's reaction was very much like our reaction, because people in this country tend to think 'big = Glastonbury'.   Having said that, though, I'm fairly sure they've gone for her again this time, and it's broken down. Whether it's only just broken down or not, I'm not sure, but I'd air on the side of - they thought they had her, up to a certain point.
    • Yeah, I did wonder if they might be getting too big for Piece Hall now. Wet Leg did Castlefield this year and were subbing them at Tramlines. Wishful thinking! I'd happily see them do another outdoor headline in the north of England, wherever it might be (except R+L, which I'm def too old for now 😂)
    • You've certainly got a bunch of American acts who absolutely adore the festival and are willing to bring peanuts for it. You can never discount The Killers on that basis.
    • Law unto herself, Madge. But I think, for a certain generation, Hyde Park still has a touch of mystery and magic - that and Wembley Stadium.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...