Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

ok, well they were not forced into the 28bn pledge...they themselves came up with it. I guess the argument will be that the situation has changed and they can't guarantee that amount will be spent...which hardly instils confidence they will meet any targets, it's not as if everything has got cheaper.

Is it really the £28b that’s the issue for you? Take that out of the equation and what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Neil said:

impossible to meaningfully commit to without time travel to know the future situation for how much money is available to be spent - tories could poison pill it with the next budget.

Labour don’t even know the state of the government finances so they can’t really fully commit to spending plans. If they ever announced a policy without any plans for how it would be funded then there would be uproar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Is it really the £28b that’s the issue for you? Take that out of the equation and what do you think?

Its the fiscal rules that need to change in particular the rule about debt falling after five years. They can still reduce the deficit on current spending and use the borrow to invest rule for the green plan 

Edited by lazyred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Is it really the £28b that’s the issue for you? Take that out of the equation and what do you think?

I think without it labour would struggle to grow the economy by enough to increase public spending by enough l.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lazyred said:

Its the fiscal rules that need to change in particular the rule about debt falling after 5 five years. They can still reduce the deficit on current spending and use the borrow to invest rule for the green plan 

what are the fiscal rules? 

But yeah, that 5 year rule would be quite the restriction...extend to 10 years (2 terms) and they'd have a lot more room to do stuff.

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lazyred said:

Its the fiscal rules that need to change in particular the rule about debt falling after five years. They can still reduce the deficit on current spending and use the borrow to invest rule for the green plan 

Labour’s fiscal rules will differ from the Tories within a year just like they did last time round. They can amend certain rules so that the policies will be able to fit within the rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

I guess...as Skip says shouldn't worry about counting the pennies...

We haven't got time to count the pennies

Last time I checked you can't eat or drink money, esp when it's 1's and 0's on a server

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

The dream of continual growth on a planet with finite resources and susceptible to collapse due to human greed is what's killing this planet.

As a species we actually deserve what's coming 

it's not even that, although obviously that doesn't help...it's the fact we are burning fossil fuels for energy right now...if we suddenly somehow switch our energy source to something which doesn't pump greenhouse gases into the atmosphere then in theory we can keep on growing without f**king the climate..in theory.  And to switch to these alternative sources is massive, easy to say just stop using gas/oil/coal...easy peasy...but we're so reliant on it in so many ways...heat/transport/steel/cement...it will take a while to switch. I agree we need to cut back on consumption, but surely at moment no.1 priority has to be finding and using greener energy. And I have said this a few times, it is good that UK has ambitious net zero goals, but need China/India/USA to get moving rapidly or we're not going to get anywhere...and need to persuade the developing countries to stop developing and stay poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saying ‘we deserve what’s coming’ probably isn’t the best way of trying to get people on side. That’ll turn people off your cause pretty quickly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skip997 said:

The dream of continual growth on a planet with finite resources and susceptible to collapse due to human greed is what's killing this planet.

As a species we actually deserve what's coming 

growth isn't just growth in stuff - growth in personal services is also growth! can also be growth in prejudice and ignorance and then we do deserve what's coming.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

immigration and spending is about to swing round to focus on labour  again, cos....

Quote

 

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Wasn't just me who thought it was either oversold or inadequately setup for the event then? For Pride, over the weekend, where there's also acts in the large blue marquee that was to the right of the "arena" (for want of a better term), it's probably much better as people are dispersed more. Thought the band were great, as was Nick, though he was clearly struggling with his voice at times.
    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...