Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, phimill said:

My proposal on the "windfall tax" would be:

Energy giants have their profits capped at FY21 levels (already inflated due to Covid)

Remaining UK profits held by UK government, these profits can be returned to the company based on a sound investment plan to green energy once the investment has occurred and green efficiencies in place (current profit levels should allow for investments to take place). Any profits not planned to be re-invested into the green energy are used to offset the borrowing used to implement the new cap

Like it, but too rational for our right wing ideologues.

Although I'm not sure it would generate enough money to cover the cap even at the eye watering £2.5k level...people on here have already pointed out that we can only cap their profits based on what they're making in our territories, which I seem to remember labour suggesting would be £8bn, nice, but far short of what is needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

Like it, but too rational for our right wing ideologues.

Although I'm not sure it would generate enough money to cover the cap even at the eye watering £2.5k level...people on here have already pointed out that we can only cap their profits based on what they're making in our territories, which I seem to remember labour suggesting would be £8bn, nice, but far short of what is needed.

If we can only cap on profits in our territoires, that means that the windfall tax sure can only be on the profits from the same territoires. Thus windfall would max be £8bn - could be a reason why it isn't being taken. Still that £8bn would improve the time to 100% renewables and net zero

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, phimill said:

If we can only cap on profits in our territoires, that means that the windfall tax sure can only be on the profits from the same territoires. Thus windfall would max be £8bn - could be a reason why it isn't being taken. Still that £8bn would improve the time to 100% renewables and net zero

yeah, £8bn is what labour said it would be...their freeze would be paid for by following:

  • Backdating the windfall tax to January and accounting for higher oil and gas prices to raise £8bn
  • Dropping the £400 energy rebate and other pledges made by Tory leadership candidates to raise £14bn
  • By reducing inflation with lower energy bills, leading to a cut in government debt interest payments of £7bn

(from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-62542541)

so, obviously if getting closer to 100bn then windfall tax is a smaller proportion, but it would be popular with public as looks fairer, which is why I don't understand why she just doesn't do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, phimill said:

If we can only cap on profits in our territoires, that means that the windfall tax sure can only be on the profits from the same territoires. Thus windfall would max be £8bn - could be a reason why it isn't being taken. Still that £8bn would improve the time to 100% renewables and net zero

I think the figure that Truss is announcing today is more in the region of £100bn+ over the next couple of years.

However, just on a basic humanitarian level there should be a windfall tax on spectacular 'accidental' profits rather than it be funneled to a discrete bunch of rich shareholders.

The bigger issue that stevie has alluded to is that JRM is now fully opening the doors to energy firms to drill and frack across the country. Whilst we'll get some revenue from licensing now should be the time we go all Norway and nationalise the money grabbing (polluting, exploiting finite resources, lack of serious investment in renewables etc) bastards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, steviewevie said:

bailout.

Just nationalise them.

Its fucking staggering. How much more money do these firms want!?

They are putting up prices, making us pay for it and giving them £40b. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yeah I did spot that AXS had more available for the O2 shows Muse are doing, though I think that comes with the territory of AXS now being the venue's primary ticket selling platform.    My instinct remains they'll probably still play to a big crowd on the night - sales were similarly slow in 2023 but videos of those gigs showed the venue looking pretty much full. Equally it probably would be sold out if the pricing was even just slightly less ridiculous. Shave up to £50 off some of these categories and I think that would've got people to go with it. 
    • Some are definitely already there with that and with another round of inflation looking like it's on the way, it certainly locks that in. And I say that as someone who also isn't willing to break the £100 marker. 
    • A lot of people have said this online but does the Marvel world need new cities to play with? New York seems to be a target of all the villains to the point where you wonder why anyone in that world still lives there. Much as you can accuse me of overthinking it I guess haha.    I do agree that The Void is a compellingly different villain in many respects given the superpower is trapping people in their most traumatic memories. Shame in some respects the film came out in the post-Endgame funk Marvel seems stuck in and a lot of people missed out on it.    Speaking of, I rewatched Infinity War the other day. First time I think I've seen it since seeing it in the cinema on its opening day. Holds up pretty well imo - I have issues sometimes with ensemble casts and jumping between 4/5 storylines but it felt this one got the balance right and also properly explored Thanos. So it was good. 
    • I didn't think I'd ever watched a Coben adaptation or read one of the original books, though turns out I did - I watched one called The Stranger back in 2020. Clearly didn't stick long in my memory as until researching it, I didn't know that was one of his. Queens Gambit or Black Mirror, it was not.    But clearly it's popular tripe in some respect if Netflix is going yes to everything he has to offer and are apparently about to start trying his most popular individual character, as seen below:   https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2026/jul/30/how-harlan-coben-became-the-king-of-potboiler-tv   Plus hey. Sometimes people get a kick from watching something and deriding it as crap. Don't let this internet rando stop you haha 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...