Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

Really surprised how much I enjoyed PMQs today. It was a breath of fresh air after all that Johnson frat boy shite. I may fundamentally disagree with Truss, but if today was anything to go by then at least she is willing to engage and answer questions and not resort to name calling or answer by crowing about something utterly unrelated and 'world-beating'.

Her style also helps Starmer as he's got someone to actually debate with which means we get a much better sense of where the dividing lines are. His getting her to reject any windfall tax on principle worked well in positioning labour's concern about not burdening future tax payers with enormous bills.

There was also a good range of questions which showed that unlike Johnson she actually reads stuff and is abreast of what's going on across the different depts.

Yep, definitely refreshing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

Really surprised how much I enjoyed PMQs today. It was a breath of fresh air after all that Johnson frat boy shite. I may fundamentally disagree with Truss, but if today was anything to go by then at least she is willing to engage and answer questions and not resort to name calling or answer by crowing about something utterly unrelated and 'world-beating'.

Her style also helps Starmer as he's got someone to actually debate with which means we get a much better sense of where the dividing lines are. His getting her to reject any windfall tax on principle worked well in positioning labour's concern about not burdening future tax payers with enormous bills.

There was also a good range of questions which showed that unlike Johnson she actually reads stuff and is abreast of what's going on across the different depts.

Yep, definitely refreshing.

didn't watch, but opinion I have read seems to be same as yours, she did pretty well and makes a nice change from Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

Really surprised how much I enjoyed PMQs today. It was a breath of fresh air after all that Johnson frat boy shite. I may fundamentally disagree with Truss, but if today was anything to go by then at least she is willing to engage and answer questions and not resort to name calling or answer by crowing about something utterly unrelated and 'world-beating'.

Her style also helps Starmer as he's got someone to actually debate with which means we get a much better sense of where the dividing lines are. His getting her to reject any windfall tax on principle worked well in positioning labour's concern about not burdening future tax payers with enormous bills.

There was also a good range of questions which showed that unlike Johnson she actually reads stuff and is abreast of what's going on across the different depts.

Yep, definitely refreshing.

There was actually policy discussion! Hurray! You are right it was refreshing to watch. We’ve headed back to the old days of the different ideologies defining these sessions it looks like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we said before though the Tories will still have the easy ride with that. Labour still need to be careful and clearly articulate how they will fund their policy ideas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

As we said before though the Tories will still have the easy ride with that. Labour still need to be careful and clearly articulate how they will fund their policy ideas. 

sure...but labour have pledged to spend billions on green stuff, right? and they're going to be asked where that money is coming from, and apparently the answer is borrowing...will be easier to say that now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

sure...but labour have pledged to spend billions on green stuff, right? and they're going to be asked where that money is coming from, and apparently the answer is borrowing...will be easier to say that now.

They said that the money would be coming from closing tax loopholes for certain businesses and relieving private schools of their charitable status. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

that is separate to how the £28bn/year green investment thing is funded.

I dunno man, I think it's one of the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

 

 

Osborne is a dick, I'll never forgive him for fucking up solar with his budget in 2015 (I think...) at just the time when it was no longer seen as the 'hippy' thing to do and instead the average joe in the street was considering it. Just an atrocious and pathetic ideological decision especially given where we now are 7 years later.

There is an in-tray from hell awaiting Truss, she did okay today but after Johnson the bar was low. Let's not forget she's herding cats in her party and if she manages to deal effectively with each of the major issues facing the country without slipping up or her party imploding then she'll have proved herself a remarkable leader.

There are sooooo many problems that are coming down the track that it seems unlikely she'll be gurning in the HoC for much longer. She did well today, we can give her that, but after tomorrow's energy announcement and all the promises she made today (sorting out ambulance waiting times etc etc) there is plenty that will come home to haunt her pretty sharpish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I don't really worry about headliners (unless there's a real possibility of a once-in-a-lifetime artist landing for it) but I'm starting to feel a bit cold on the names floating around bar Fontaines.  Harry Styles and Sam Fender, I can see the value and commercially speaking, they've earned it.  Sabrina Carpenter is obviously popular enough to do it - but after she's headlined everywhere else and done Coachella earlier this year, is it not just a bit predictable to follow what other festivals have done?
    • Bollocks to “safe” headliners, bollocks to the masses. Get interesting, get risky, challenge people.
    • The Cure would be a dream, I can definitely see them doing a second run of festivals they may have missed this year and they seem the definitive Latitude act  If they do festivals next year maybe The Strokes could be a shout? Im stunned either them or Kings of Leon haven't played yet This is a great shout for names, youre right that CMAT is taking a year out though - we're like to know more in the autumn when festivals start making announcements  The only other act I'd really love to see is Idles headline the tent 
    • Very sad for Greazy Alice
    • Nino 3.4 anomaly already in 'very strong' (>2.0C) territory.  That's very impressive for July which is still early days for El Nino development.    
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...