Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Peter Dow


Guest Uncle Liam

Recommended Posts

You need to remember that Condi met Gaddafi only a few years before he was overthrown and killed and so in principle Condi meeting the Queen could be no more a statement of American intent than Condi meeting Gaddafi.

I am just speculating you understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 865
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

PETER DOW IS A LEGEND.........................................................................FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK ON HERE PD, IT SURE BRINGS A SMILE TO MY FACE.

Edited by swede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second paragraph defining key traits of fascism from wikipedia:

"Fascism promotes political violence and war as actions that create national regeneration, spirit and vitality.[4][8] It views conflict as a fact of life that is responsible for all human progress.[9] It exalts militarism as providing positive transformation in society and providing spiritual renovation, education, instilling of a will to dominate in people's character and creating national comradeship through military service.[10] Fascists commonly utilize paramilitary organizations for violent attacks on opponents or to overthrow a political system."

Apart from the military service, that sounds pretty much like what you've been preaching.

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Yes and my opposition has been forbidden and suppressed by the Queen's royalist fascist government, courts, police, prisons etc.

yeah, that's why you're able to freely post what you want here and other places. :lol:

So according to you suppressing or banning a fascist political party would itself be "fascist"?

we have law that is able to ban 'real' fascist parties.

The BNP is fascist-lite, and not able to be banned by that law, because it is not (openly, at least) actually a fascist party, instead just a party with a strong liking for fascism.

So what you would be banning is a democratic party, in the name of democracy. Iyt's laughable.

And you keep on saying that democracy is govt by all of the people. Tho in your version, the "all" isn't really all is it? Because you exclude those you don't agree with, only because you feel unable to defeat them with democracy.

you must be prepared to take action to suppress and ban fascist political organisations and certainly keep them well away from public political platforms.

that wouldn't be because some of the public - part of "all of the people" - might support them, by any chance? :lol:

So it is not a question of banning fascist individuals from having their private "viewpoint" (which would be an assault on the dignity of the person, characteristic of psychiatry which as a quack profession revels in denying people their private viewpoint, but I do not, I respect the integrity of a person's brain).

unless they want to vote BNP of course. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you want to ban the BNP. Isn't that a case of a minority being treated undemocratically by the majority?

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After not working for twenty years, he's essentially unemployable in anything but more menial work and should accept such a job and for once give something back instead of everyone paying for the roof over his head and the food in ample belly.

Edited by Peter Dow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I am not a parasite. My needs which are taken care of by the welfare state are modest. I consume far less than most, yet my productive worth, in terms of what I produce - my political writing, websites, posts like this here in efestivals, to the people, for all mankind is far more than most.

Some re-evaluation isa neededf here. :lol:

Peter, if these are so productive, how big is the group of people that you lead? 1, 2 or 3 people?

And if you're so appreciated for your writings, why won't your supporters financially support you?

I hear the sound of cuckoos eating fruitcake.

If Britain was run as a republic, we'd all be 33% richer on average.

In your fantasy republic you're going to have to get someone other than you to run the economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if a majority don't want to ban the BNP, the BNP should be banned anyway. The BNP should be banned for what they are, not depending on who votes to ban them or who votes to tolerate them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...