Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Payment plan


Guest mblackhouse

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I still cannot believe that the sales have been so slow, but I have to say that economic climate or not, it all came down to the lineup for me. 10 years of the monday night scramble came to an end on the day of that poster leak, and yesterday out of curiosity I looked on ebay and watched a pair go for £300, which I feel is a much more reasonable amount!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a fantastic move by ticketline. Although I'm sure it was motivated more by trying to get more tickets sold (and therefore more booking fees in the bank) rather than out of genuine concern for broke festival-goers it's good to see someone using their initiative and doing something that helps people out a bit. I think I'll try and get all my tickets from them in the future, they deserve my booking fee more than see or ticketmaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think it's a good move, £200 in one go is alot of money, especially to skint students etc... Alot of fests are going this way, Glastonbury you pay £50 in October then don't have to pay the rest till April also I'm paying my Rockness early bird ticket up in three installments of £33.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think its a great idea.

also I dont see why people think the festival is slow to sell out, in 2004 tickets were on general sale on all websites up to May, and tickets have been on sale every other year if you want them (You could ring seetickets up to August last year and get tickets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have to pay by installments you seriously need to question whether you can afford the weekend itself.

It's something you plan for surely?

And before you say anything, I am a student myself. Not a well off one either, the nice middle groud where you don't get a huge loan and grant but your parents can't afford to help you out. And job market being what it is.

Anyway, if you can't plan on having the money in your account, how can you plan for having even basic spending money for the weekend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have to pay by installments you seriously need to question whether you can afford the weekend itself.

It's something you plan for surely?

And before you say anything, I am a student myself. Not a well off one either, the nice middle groud where you don't get a huge loan and grant but your parents can't afford to help you out. And job market being what it is.

Anyway, if you can't plan on having the money in your account, how can you plan for having even basic spending money for the weekend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have to pay by installments you seriously need to question whether you can afford the weekend itself.

It's something you plan for surely?

And before you say anything, I am a student myself. Not a well off one either, the nice middle groud where you don't get a huge loan and grant but your parents can't afford to help you out. And job market being what it is.

Anyway, if you can't plan on having the money in your account, how can you plan for having even basic spending money for the weekend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps because you have 3 months between Christmas and tickets going on sale which isn't alot of time to get the money together if you're skint. If you only had to pay 4 installments of £50 it would give you plenty of time to get the money together. As for spending money, you can spend as much or as little as you need. It's quite easy to do the weekend on a bare minimum if you're skint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has it not occured to those of you arrogantly lecturing others about money that this clearly isn't aimed at those who were always planning to go but is designed to bring in new punters who may not have 200 notes just now, but may impulse buy with the added-sweetener of an interest free deposit scheme?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. The festival is too expensive for what it is but in the grand scheme of things £200 is f**k all really. If you're in a full time job, you should definately be able to afford it, if you can't, you need to sort your finances out. Students should be able to use their loan, or their part time job money - let's be real, there's not a student in the land that doesn't go out regularly getting smashed at what, £10 a night minimum?

The only people I could understand who can't afford it are the people with major debt or other financial commitments, the unemployed, or those living on the breadline, and kids whose parents are refusing to subsidise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people who most benefit from this are those who don't have £200 to burn all at once but who can blow £50 on four occasions between now and August and commit to saving up any spending money between now and the festival. I imagine those still at school or University with jobs planned for the Summer who can use that to pay the last instalments and spending money are who this is aimed at mostly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking as someone who works full time and is interested in the deposit scheme for various reasons, could you please advise 1) What puts you in a position to advise people you don't know to 'sort their finances out', and 2) By what criteria £200 is 'f**k all'?

Edited by Mariner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...