Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

RHCP?


Guest x-kitty-x

Recommended Posts

I reckon Bestival might grab them if they do play a UK fest, it's becoming big enough to be seen as a major fest to stroke RHCP's ego and Bestival will be desperate enough to get a huge name even if they are piss poor live as they still don't have the same authority as other big name fests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I reckon Bestival might grab them if they do play a UK fest, it's becoming big enough to be seen as a major fest to stroke RHCP's ego and Bestival will be desperate enough to get a huge name even if they are piss poor live as they still don't have the same authority as other big name fests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was the year before I would agree but with Bestival expanding so much they will want headliners to go with it and they've already booked Cure with their reputation as a poor live band.

I think there is a chance but is more likley they won't be playing over here at all but I'm suspicous as they haven't announced any tour dates so may be playing just festivals to promote the new album so a Euro would be likely.

Yet Muse has a reputation as a good live band and Cure don't. Most people say they were disappointing (which I agree with) and I remembering going to the bar whilst they were playing and there were fans bitching about how awful they are live (which I don't agree with) and their general reputation is poor but nearly as poor as RHCP. And if The Cure as so great live why did they asked to play Glasto and were told no you're shit live a few years ago?

Edited by beau1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're claiming that its a general opinion that The Cure are a poor live band. I've seen non-fans claim the opposite opinion and that they are a fantastic live band and subsequently got into the band due to seeing them live. One or two people claiming something, does not make it a fact and it does not mean they arn't a good live band. I have never seen this 'general opinion' that The Cure arn't a good live band, outside of these boards and thats what I am disputing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets get our facts straight here - the red hot chili peppers are a f**king huge draw (one of the very biggest in fact) and festivals clamber over each other to get them. So stop talking as if they're some washed up tribute band (e.g. guns n roses) who can't get a gig.

They have a damn good reputation as one of the best loved bands among the general public, don't let internet forum snobbery fool you otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets get our facts straight here - the red hot chili peppers are a f**king huge draw (one of the very biggest in fact) and festivals clamber over each other to get them. So stop talking as if they're some washed up tribute band (e.g. guns n roses) who can't get a gig.

They have a damn good reputation as one of the best loved bands among the general public, don't let internet forum snobbery fool you otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets get our facts straight here - the red hot chili peppers are a f**king huge draw (one of the very biggest in fact) and festivals clamber over each other to get them. So stop talking as if they're some washed up tribute band (e.g. guns n roses) who can't get a gig.

They have a damn good reputation as one of the best loved bands among the general public, don't let internet forum snobbery fool you otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was the year before I would agree but with Bestival expanding so much they will want headliners to go with it and they've already booked Cure with their reputation as a poor live band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets get our facts straight here - the red hot chili peppers are a f**king huge draw (one of the very biggest in fact) and festivals clamber over each other to get them. So stop talking as if they're some washed up tribute band (e.g. guns n roses) who can't get a gig.

They have a damn good reputation as one of the best loved bands among the general public, don't let internet forum snobbery fool you otherwise.

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't internet forum snobbery. Most people are basing there opinion on what they have seem especially the disgraceful headlining set they did at Leeds a couple of years ago.

I am a fan of RHCP, saw them in Barcelona a few years ago and it was an amazing show I love their older stuff and dare I saw it, some of their newer songs as well. BUT nothing can excuse their last performance at Leeds. Yes they may still be a draw for organisers but if they do headline anywhere they will need to really impress or the damage will be irreparable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of interest - for people saying The Cure are poor now live, who has seen them since 2006 when they started playing well with a new lineup?

The Cure now compared with the Cure before 2004 are like two different bands to be honest.

On-Topic: I wasn't there but the RHCP Reading/Leeds performances don't seem too bad. There was a lot of w*nkery and improvisation but the songs themselves didn't seem too badly performed. I'd see them at Bestival if they played anyways.

Edited by beau1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I missed Reading that year, but to me they didn't seem too bad at all. But so many people on here have said they were shit that I'm prepared to believe them. I wouldn't actually mind them at all next year, I've never seen them before, and I think they've got the potential to be very good. Think it's unlikely they'll play though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...