Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

  • Admin

I would be happy with a more competitive league in Scotland (watching it is hard work at the best of times) but it's just not going to happen because of the size of Rangers and Celtic compared to all the other clubs. It's just unfair how a team can win the SPL and have to go through 2 qualifying rounds whereas a team that finished 4th in the Premier League only has to go through one!

Nope, it's fair because it's based on success - you know, the same thing that gives Rangers that guarantee of Chumps league qualies every year. ;)

If you don't want it to be based on previous success in the Chumps, then surely who gets into the Chumps shouldn't be based on their success in their national league either, and they should just draw lots for who gets there.

I'm a Rangers supporter.

Which says it all. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Fergies not complained yet at the injury I see, Shows Whinger how he should act.. And Get well soon Valencia

I just watched the vid on youtube - wasnt even a bad tackle. In fact it didnt even look like a foul. Guy is just unlucky but hope he has a speedy recovery.

In spawn's word 2+2 must equal 5. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, it's fair because it's based on success - you know, the same thing that gives Rangers that guarantee of Chumps league qualies every year. ;)

If you don't want it to be based on previous success in the Chumps, then surely who gets into the Chumps shouldn't be based on their success in their national league either, and they should just draw lots for who gets there.

Which says it all. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I'm not biased atall towards Rangers, I'm arguing this on a whole Scottish football level. The reason why Scotland has went from one automatic qualification is because of the restructure Platini brought in which clearly favours the bigger teams. The coefficent is over 5 years which includes Rangers getting to the Uefa Cup final and both Rangers and Celtic reaching the knockout stages....

No, which clearly favours the more *successful* teams. Which is exactly the situation that Rangers benefits from in Scotland, and from which they end up in the Chumps every year.

If it shouldn't be a competition that favours success, then it follows that the teams that get into it shouldn't be necessarily successful either.

As things stand Rangers have all the chance they need to get as far as they want, each and every year - regardless of whether they're successful in Scotland or not. Which is better for them than them only getting in every other year on average if they first had to be successful at home. ;)

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

how so?

By being in the qualies.

If they ain't good enough to beat the Lithuanian champions or whichever minnows they get put up against in those qualies, then it's just the same as Rangers are considering Kilmarock or whoever else are the SPL's bottom also-rans who don't get to make worthwhile progress in that league.

If winning is what makes Rangers SPL champions and they think that's fair - and they do!!, then they can't really complain when others win to Rangers detriment can they? To complain would be ridiculous. So Rangers are ridiculous by complaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that makes no sense whatsoever.

rangers are complaining about the financial gap which doesn't allow them to compete properly with the big boys. they would rather teams weren't allowed to get so far ahead of them financially as this is what is causing the gulf.

why would they complain about the gap in scotland? even if it was more even, celtic and rangers would still come top. end of the day, the best players want to play for celtic and rangers. always has been that way, always will be. if the finances are the same, can you really see robbie keane or whoever choosing to play for hibs if celtic or rangers came in for them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

that makes no sense whatsoever.

rangers are complaining about the financial gap which doesn't allow them to compete properly with the big boys. they would rather teams weren't allowed to get so far ahead of them financially as this is what is causing the gulf.

And they have the same feelings about their position in Scotland do they? :lol::lol:

I must have missed them passing their excess money to all the minor teams in the SPL. :lol:

Did they even do anything to help Gretna when they were in the shit? Or did they happily sit back and watch them go under?

(and quite possibly see if there was any way they could profit from that demise ;))

why would they complain about the gap in scotland? even if it was more even, celtic and rangers would still come top. end of the day, the best players want to play for celtic and rangers. always has been that way, always will be. if the finances are the same, can you really see robbie keane or whoever choosing to play for hibs if celtic or rangers came in for them?

Unless it happens, how can you ever know? :rolleyes:

The simple fact is that Rangers are the beneficiaries of an unfair competition, so it takes the biscuit for them to complain that the bye they get for eternity into the Chumps qualies as a result of that unfairness is itself unfair.

f**k me it's not hard to grasp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rangers win the league, they get into the champions league. how is that a bye? sorry, did celtic not challenge them or something? if they did come second, they still would have had to get past two qualifying rounds, the second being against a very decent team. so where is this bye you speak of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should go back to the Champions League being just that, the Champions of every league in Europe and nobody else. Revamp the Europa League to accommodate all the other teams. The void between the big leagues and the small leagues is growing exponentially due to the Champions League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should go back to the Champions League being just that, the Champions of every league in Europe and nobody else. Revamp the Europa League to accommodate all the other teams. The void between the big leagues and the small leagues is growing exponentially due to the Champions League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

celtic get knocked out by braga.

arsenal currently 3-0 up against braga and it's not even half time.

THAT tells me there's a huge gulf in class between english and scottish football!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? The format is fine, just dont bother with English teams in the earlier rounds, well - Arsenal, Man U and Chelsea this season. Some much more interesting games out there to watch at various stages that give you an idea of other footballing nations - I watched AC Milan v Auxerre tonight, Pato looked shite. If I didn't have money going on AC I'd have watched Madrid - Ajax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? The format is fine, just dont bother with English teams in the earlier rounds, well - Arsenal, Man U and Chelsea this season. Some much more interesting games out there to watch at various stages that give you an idea of other footballing nations - I watched AC Milan v Auxerre tonight, Pato looked shite. If I didn't have money going on AC I'd have watched Madrid - Ajax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Same’s happened at MSG recently with Rush and Phish alternating nights. I guess each band has its own unique production so their riggers will be kept busy
    • The rumour was uk arena tour late this year.  Same as Charli xcx cant be announced until Reading headline is done.   
    • Latest from the sun at least is that harry is still headlining but Olivia has turned down a spot next year to work on new music and hope for 2028.   So they can't have Fender, Fontaines, Harry, Olivia and Madonna. 
    • I mean I don't think EC and FFDP are borderline sub, they wouldn't be any lower now.   2025 is about as strong as Bloodstock gets yet this year only one headline would sub and the others would play 3rd down or lower.    Machine Head wouldn't sub at Download regardless of rarity, they don't sell enough tickets and I'm not sure Gojira would sub either. Their last UK tour was a mix of smaller arenas and academy dates. Ally Pally being the only London date, not even Wembley Arena. 
    • live music / main stage will generally end around 11pm but theres dj’s and late goings on right till 4am if you are so inclined.   Drinks are about £7.50 a pint probably and yes theres lots of mixed drinks / spirits / cocktails available to buy   wonderful festival, back for my third year in a row and 4th overall
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...