Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Fleet Foxes


Guest cowmadiddy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So let me understand.

Some people like them. Some people don't like them. Some people feel its ok to say 'i dont like fleet foxes' on the internet. Some people don't think it's ok to say 'i don't like fleet foxes' on the internet.

Am I up to speed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep me. i forced myself to listen to their album yesterday and wasn't at all impressed. quite annoyed that i wasted all that time actually, but impressed that i didn't switch it off earlier. shame, i've heard such good things about them.

another one of those "one decent song" bands.

Edited by niceandfriendly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all, just not a scenster with the opinion that a band is crap when it becomes popular and a band that the broadsheets champion and sell very little units are amazing. Not knocking anyones musical taste, just gets a bit annoying when living in the North and you hear posh Southern ever so green students banging on about how much Fleet Foxes, Bon Iver and Regina Spector are tooootalllly changing the world when they could barely name a Hendrix, Stone Roses or Doors song.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me understand.

Some people like them. Some people don't like them. Some people feel its ok to say 'i dont like fleet foxes' on the internet. Some people don't think it's ok to say 'i don't like fleet foxes' on the internet.

Am I up to speed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like them but do feel they are on the wrong stage - would come over better in say the Acoustic tent or one of the other smaller stages.

Personally I like threads that get people discussing what they do/don't like and why - makes life a little more interesting! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f**k! I must be a real anamoly! I'm a northerner who likes Fleet Foxes, Bon Iver, Hendrix, The Roses and the Stones!

There'll be cultural anthropologists the world over queueing up to analyse me.

(I'm not keen on Regina Spector though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I really like them.

But do continue to spend your time articulating how you don't like a band. I mean it's not like you're wasting time that could be spent on, oh, say, finding stuff you do like.

There's so much amazing music in the world, why waste your energy talking about the stuff you don't like? Unless you're directly asked of course, would probably be rude not to say it then.

Don't like? Just file under "don't like" in brain and then move on :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like this thread.

So please do continue to spend your time articulating how you don't like people articulating how they don't like a band. I mean, it's not like you're wasting time that could be spent on, oh, say starting or contributing to more meaningful threads

Don't like reading people's opinions of bands? Just file under don't like in brain and then move on

:lol::):D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all, just not a scenster with the opinion that a band is crap when it becomes popular and a band that the broadsheets champion and sell very little units are amazing. Not knocking anyones musical taste, just gets a bit annoying when living in the North and you hear posh Southern ever so green students banging on about how much Fleet Foxes, Bon Iver and Regina Spector are tooootalllly changing the world when they could barely name a Hendrix, Stone Roses or Doors song.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like this thread.

So please do continue to spend your time articulating how you don't like people articulating how they don't like a band. I mean, it's not like you're wasting time that could be spent on, oh, say starting or contributing to more meaningful threads

Don't like reading people's opinions of bands? Just file under don't like in brain and then move on

:D:lol::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fleet Foxes have written one of the best albums of the decade, great harmonies, lyrics, melodies, mood, just coz its not blurring "thats not my name" in your face or some such shit with some gay beat. Come on man these are seriously good and its blatant to see.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they're ace. The album is something a bit different, that has managed to make a slight breakthrough into the mainstream, which is no bad thing. Good sunny tunes for a similarly sunny afternoon/evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this the thread where all the forum retards congregate or have standards just slipped on here lately?

Obviously you're not a retard just because you don't enjoy the music of Fleet Foxes, but some of the things said here are laughable. "Ridiculous Pyramid slot" - what, because the Pyramid gets exclusively great bands? "They sound like Goldfrapp" - get some ears. And the IRISHMANC bloke...well I think the fact you feel the need to have your username in capital letters probably identifies you as a bit of a knuckle dragger.

I love the Stone Roses and Fleet Foxes. The Doors are f**king rubbish though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...