Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Blur


Guest badger10

Recommended Posts

Hoping Kasabian headline the Channel 4 same time as Blur are on, don't think I could suffer 90 minutes of that smug c**t Albarn. The thought of a field full of people singing 'Country House' or 'Parklife' makes me sick in my own mouth.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

neil, if you read this, have you added blur as a strong rumour because of the circumstances discussed so far on this forum and that they seem to be doing the festivals this summer or have you recieved some more information to suggest they will be playing v?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is, doing a reunion tour for the cash doesn't really bother me. I was super excited to see RATM at Leeds last year despite knowing the set list in advance & it being an obvious money spinner. Rage however had a huge impact both musically & politically & were/are recognised as an important band, plus it's alwayas a pleasure seeing Tom Morello doing crazy shit. Blur however, IMO, had a couple of decent songs when they first came out, did some pseudo comedy shit,made one horribly obvious song to try & crack the USA (Song 2) & failed before disappearing up their own arses. Maybe it's because I let the whole Britpop thing pass me by?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes but Blur have a lot more difference in their music, they did try and have a different sound with each album and I respect that, so what if they're back together for the money, everyone else does it why shouldn't they?

I've been saying since they announced the Hyde park shows, Blur would headline V this year

Just wait until The Libertines are reunited to headline Reading and Leeds, a spot they would never get if they had never split up, a lot of acts now they split up and get back together years later and get a headline slot, Rage got headline slots everywhere because of this but when they last played Reading and Leeds when they were last going they played 4th down

At least you can say Blur have always been a huge group and they deserve the headline spot [im not saying rage aren't good enough to headline, but would they have if they had never split up?]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Rage wouldn't have headlined if they hadn't split but they were such an iconic band that they had alot of new, younger fans (much like kids now listening to Nirvana) who would never have had a chance to see them when they were active. Do Blur have the same appeal? Maybe there are indie kids now who have discovered Blur in their absence who will relish the chance to see them but it appears to be more of a nostalgia trip than the Rage reunion IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just noticed blur have been relegated to just a rumour now, down from strong rumour.

got a feeling that guy who said its definitely oasis and the killers as headliners could be right you know....

would fit in with kasabian TBC as well as they would play under oasis.

Edited by mercury
Link to comment
Share on other sites

also the potentially good thing about oasis being there is that it increases the chances of a weezer appearence i reckon. i recall reading an interview with rivers not so long ago saying they were playing on doing some dates with oasis this year, and they are big fans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty disappointed, Ive never seen Blur, and Ive seen Oais twice at V2005 and TITP 2002 and both times they were just average

hmm oh well it could be worse, but I could see a lot of the fanbase of V going to those Oasis shows anyway, just thought they would try something a bit different, oh well, if it is Oasis it's still a big name which V deserves, If Blur don't play V, I can see Reading and Leeds trying to get them seen as they seem to be having a headliner crisis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...